Filippo Aschieri, Francesca Fantini, Arianna Antonelli, Mark Van Ryzin, Justin D Smith
{"title":"Therapeutic Assessment in a University Counseling Center: A Replicated Single-Case Time-Series Pilot Study.","authors":"Filippo Aschieri, Francesca Fantini, Arianna Antonelli, Mark Van Ryzin, Justin D Smith","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2023.2296065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we pilot tested Therapeutic Assessment (TA) in a university counseling center using a replicated single-case design to generate hypotheses on the effectiveness and applicability for this setting and population. We aimed to see whether TA could be an effective brief intervention to address students' presenting mental health concerns. Further, we explored whether different types of presenting concerns were associated with differential symptomatic improvement during the intervention. An independent clinician interviewed participants before the baseline period to develop individualized rating scales pertaining to their presenting concerns. Eight consecutive students accessing the counseling center enrolled in the study and rated their presenting problems across baseline, intervention, and follow-up periods. The intervention involved five TA sessions. The results suggested that TA is associated with statistically significant reductions in clients' symptoms in the context of a university counseling center. Idiographic trajectory analysis of participant data who experienced significant and insignificant change was used to test whether changes were associated with the onset of TA. The findings suggest TA might be more effective for certain presenting concerns than for others. The implications for the implementation of TA in university counseling centers is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"546-557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2023.2296065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, we pilot tested Therapeutic Assessment (TA) in a university counseling center using a replicated single-case design to generate hypotheses on the effectiveness and applicability for this setting and population. We aimed to see whether TA could be an effective brief intervention to address students' presenting mental health concerns. Further, we explored whether different types of presenting concerns were associated with differential symptomatic improvement during the intervention. An independent clinician interviewed participants before the baseline period to develop individualized rating scales pertaining to their presenting concerns. Eight consecutive students accessing the counseling center enrolled in the study and rated their presenting problems across baseline, intervention, and follow-up periods. The intervention involved five TA sessions. The results suggested that TA is associated with statistically significant reductions in clients' symptoms in the context of a university counseling center. Idiographic trajectory analysis of participant data who experienced significant and insignificant change was used to test whether changes were associated with the onset of TA. The findings suggest TA might be more effective for certain presenting concerns than for others. The implications for the implementation of TA in university counseling centers is discussed.
在本研究中,我们在一所大学的心理咨询中心进行了治疗性评估(TA)的试点测试,采用了重复单例设计的方法,对治疗性评估在该环境和人群中的有效性和适用性进行了假设。我们的目标是了解治疗评估是否能成为一种有效的简短干预措施,以解决学生目前的心理健康问题。此外,我们还探讨了不同类型的问题是否与干预过程中症状改善的差异有关。在基线期之前,一位独立的临床医生对参与者进行了访谈,针对他们目前关注的问题制定了个性化的评分量表。连续八名进入心理咨询中心的学生参加了这项研究,并在基线期、干预期和随访期对他们目前的问题进行了评分。干预包括五次 TA 课程。研究结果表明,在大学心理咨询中心的背景下,TA 能显著减轻求助者的症状。对经历显著和不显著变化的参与者数据进行了等位轨迹分析,以检验变化是否与 TA 的开始有关。研究结果表明,TA 对某些问题可能比对其他问题更有效。本文讨论了在大学心理咨询中心实施TA的意义。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.