Ralph Michel Trüeb, Ngoc-Nhi Catharina Luu, Hudson Dutra Rezende
{"title":"Comment on Topical Dapsone for Folliculitis Decalvans.","authors":"Ralph Michel Trüeb, Ngoc-Nhi Catharina Luu, Hudson Dutra Rezende","doi":"10.4103/ijt.ijt_39_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Folliculitis decalvans (FD) represents a chronic and recurrent pustulofollicular scalp inflammation resulting in scarring alopecia. The presence of a bacterial bioflilm at the interface of the hair shaft may provide an explanation for the chronicity and high relapse rate of FD, even after prolonged systemic antibiotic treatments. We originally read with enthusiasm Melián-Olivera <i>et al</i>.'s retrospective study of patients with FD treated with topical dapsone published in the <i>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</i>. However, we experienced an unsuccessful trial of 5% dapsone gel in a patient with FD resulting in worsening of the disease with a pustular flareup and questioned why positive study reports with novel therapeutic options in dermatology often fail in practice. The authors admitted the limitations of their study: small sample size, retrospective, uncontrolled nature of the study, and concomitant use of other treatments. Clinical research ultimately aims at improving the patient outcome. For this purpose, trials must evaluate the outcomes that genuinely reflect the clinical utility of drugs. Therefore, we postulate stricter criteria for treatment trials and statistics in dermatology before publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals to avoid frustrations of physicians and patients alike.</p>","PeriodicalId":14417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trichology","volume":"15 3","pages":"88-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10763727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trichology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijt.ijt_39_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Folliculitis decalvans (FD) represents a chronic and recurrent pustulofollicular scalp inflammation resulting in scarring alopecia. The presence of a bacterial bioflilm at the interface of the hair shaft may provide an explanation for the chronicity and high relapse rate of FD, even after prolonged systemic antibiotic treatments. We originally read with enthusiasm Melián-Olivera et al.'s retrospective study of patients with FD treated with topical dapsone published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. However, we experienced an unsuccessful trial of 5% dapsone gel in a patient with FD resulting in worsening of the disease with a pustular flareup and questioned why positive study reports with novel therapeutic options in dermatology often fail in practice. The authors admitted the limitations of their study: small sample size, retrospective, uncontrolled nature of the study, and concomitant use of other treatments. Clinical research ultimately aims at improving the patient outcome. For this purpose, trials must evaluate the outcomes that genuinely reflect the clinical utility of drugs. Therefore, we postulate stricter criteria for treatment trials and statistics in dermatology before publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals to avoid frustrations of physicians and patients alike.
脱发性毛囊炎(FD)是一种慢性、复发性脓疱性头皮炎症,可导致瘢痕性脱发。毛囊炎是一种慢性、复发性脓疱性毛囊头皮炎症,可导致瘢痕性脱发。毛干界面存在细菌生物膜,这可能是毛囊炎慢性化和高复发率的原因之一,即使经过长期的全身抗生素治疗也是如此。我们最初以极大的热情阅读了 Melián-Olivera 等人在《美国皮肤病学会杂志》(Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology)上发表的关于 FD 患者接受外用达泊松治疗的回顾性研究。然而,我们曾在一位FD患者身上试用过5%的达松凝胶,但并不成功,结果导致病情恶化,脓疱复发,我们不禁要问,为什么皮肤科新疗法的积极研究报告往往在实践中失败。作者承认他们的研究存在局限性:样本量小、研究具有回顾性和不可控性,以及同时使用了其他治疗方法。临床研究的最终目的是改善患者的治疗效果。为此,试验必须对真正反映药物临床效用的结果进行评估。因此,我们建议在同行评审的科学杂志上发表皮肤病学治疗试验和统计数据之前,应制定更严格的标准,以避免医生和患者的失望。