Comparison of solid-phase red cell adherence and microcolumn agglutination technology using untreated and enzyme-treated red blood cells.

Q4 Medicine
Immunohematology Pub Date : 2023-12-29 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.2478/immunohematology-2023-024
D R Sanders
{"title":"Comparison of solid-phase red cell adherence and microcolumn agglutination technology using untreated and enzyme-treated red blood cells.","authors":"D R Sanders","doi":"10.2478/immunohematology-2023-024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Screening for clinically significant antibodies is crucial in transfusion medicine and is a routine part of pre-transfusion testing. The indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) is the most reliable and effective test for detecting clinically significant alloantibodies reacting at the antihuman globulin phase. Two of the main methods used for antibody detection and identification are solid-phase red cell adherence (SPRCA) and microcolumn agglutination technology (CAT), with or without enzyme-treated red blood cells (RBCs). This study was undertaken to detect and identify alloantibodies by performing antibody screen (ABS) and antibody identification (ABID) testing using SPRCA and CAT, with and without ficin-treated RBCs. Residual patient samples collected between 1 December 2020 and 19 May 2021 were saved, de-identified, and frozen at ≤-30°C before testing for alloantibodies. Seventy antibodies were detected in 53 samples among the 203 samples that underwent an ABS. Of those samples, 150 (73.0%) were nonreactive, 47 (23.1%) yielded positive results with both CAT and SPRCA, and six (3.0%) yielded positive ABS results with SPRCA only. Fifty-three samples that underwent ABID by both methods yielded eight samples with antibodies identified by SPRCA only. Additional enhancement of the CAT method by the use of ficin-treated RBCs was required to detect seven of the eight SPRCA-only antibodies; one sample remained nonreactive regardless. SPRCA testing detected clinically significant antibodies without the addition of enzyme-treated RBCs that was necessary in the CAT testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":13357,"journal":{"name":"Immunohematology","volume":"39 4","pages":"166-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunohematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/immunohematology-2023-024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Screening for clinically significant antibodies is crucial in transfusion medicine and is a routine part of pre-transfusion testing. The indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) is the most reliable and effective test for detecting clinically significant alloantibodies reacting at the antihuman globulin phase. Two of the main methods used for antibody detection and identification are solid-phase red cell adherence (SPRCA) and microcolumn agglutination technology (CAT), with or without enzyme-treated red blood cells (RBCs). This study was undertaken to detect and identify alloantibodies by performing antibody screen (ABS) and antibody identification (ABID) testing using SPRCA and CAT, with and without ficin-treated RBCs. Residual patient samples collected between 1 December 2020 and 19 May 2021 were saved, de-identified, and frozen at ≤-30°C before testing for alloantibodies. Seventy antibodies were detected in 53 samples among the 203 samples that underwent an ABS. Of those samples, 150 (73.0%) were nonreactive, 47 (23.1%) yielded positive results with both CAT and SPRCA, and six (3.0%) yielded positive ABS results with SPRCA only. Fifty-three samples that underwent ABID by both methods yielded eight samples with antibodies identified by SPRCA only. Additional enhancement of the CAT method by the use of ficin-treated RBCs was required to detect seven of the eight SPRCA-only antibodies; one sample remained nonreactive regardless. SPRCA testing detected clinically significant antibodies without the addition of enzyme-treated RBCs that was necessary in the CAT testing.

使用未经处理和酶处理的红细胞比较固相红细胞粘附和微柱凝集技术。
筛查具有临床意义的抗体是输血医学的关键,也是输血前检测的常规部分。间接抗球蛋白试验(IAT)是检测具有临床意义的抗人球蛋白抗体的最可靠、最有效的试验。抗体检测和鉴定的两种主要方法是固相红细胞粘附(SPRCA)和微柱凝集技术(CAT),可使用或不使用酶处理红细胞(RBC)。本研究采用 SPRCA 和 CAT,在使用或不使用菲辛处理过的红细胞的情况下,进行抗体筛选 (ABS) 和抗体鉴定 (ABID) 测试,以检测和鉴定异体抗体。对 2020 年 12 月 1 日至 2021 年 5 月 19 日期间采集的患者残留样本进行保存、去标识,并在≤-30°C 下冷冻,然后进行同种抗体检测。在 203 份进行 ABS 检测的样本中,有 53 份样本检测出 70 种抗体。其中 150 份样本(73.0%)无反应,47 份样本(23.1%)CAT 和 SPRCA 检测结果均为阳性,6 份样本(3.0%)仅 SPRCA 检测结果为阳性。53 份同时用两种方法进行 ABID 检测的样本中,有 8 份样本仅用 SPRCA 检测出了抗体。使用飞蓟素处理过的红细胞对 CAT 方法进行额外增强后,才能检测出 8 个仅 SPRCA 检测出的抗体中的 7 个;1 个样本无论如何都没有反应。SPRCA 检测无需像 CAT 检测那样添加酶处理过的红细胞就能检测出具有临床意义的抗体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunohematology
Immunohematology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信