Xiaohua Lan, Weiwei Zhu, Junjie Du, Jun Wang, Minghao Yang, Yan Xu, Yanjie Cao
{"title":"High G Tolerance and Cardiopulmonary Reserve Function in Healthy Air Force Aviators.","authors":"Xiaohua Lan, Weiwei Zhu, Junjie Du, Jun Wang, Minghao Yang, Yan Xu, Yanjie Cao","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6297.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> There is no consensus on whether cardiopulmonary reserve affects the risk of gravity-induced loss of consciousness (G-LOC) or almost loss of consciousness (A-LOC). Few previous studies have used cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to assess cardiopulmonary reserve function (CPRF) of fighter aviators. We compared CPET-related parameters in G-LOC/A-LOC and non-G-LOC/A-LOC fighter aviators to explore the effect of cardiopulmonary reserve function on G tolerance.<b>METHODS:</b> A total of 264 male fighter aviators with more than 500 h of flight experience participated in the study, all of whom underwent CPET and human centrifuge testing. We divided the aviators into two groups based on whether they experienced G-LOC/A-LOC during the human centrifuge test and compared the CPET parameters between the two groups.<b>RESULTS:</b> A total of 37 aviators (14%) experienced G-LOC/A-LOC. There were no significant differences in age (26.65 ± 4.30 vs. 26.01 ± 4.95), height (173.68 ± 4.21 vs. 173.55 ± 3.37), weight (69.51 ± 6.22 vs. 69.63 ± 6.01), or body mass index (23.06 ± 2.11 vs. 23.11 ± 1.82) between the two groups. Forced vital capacity (FVC) (4.95 ± 0.87 vs. 4.65 ± 0.79) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) divided by FVC (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC) (79.88 ± 7.24 vs. 83.72 ± 9.24) of pulmonary function of the G-LOC/A-LOC group was significantly lower than that of the non-G-LOC/A-LOC group. There was no significant difference in CPET-related parameters between the two groups.<b>DISCUSSION:</b> In conclusion, FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC may be a factor affecting aviators' G-LOC/A-LOC, meaning aviators with slightly lower ventilation are more likely to experience G-LOC/A-LOC. However, oxygen uptake and exercise blood pressure, oxygen pulse, etc., may not be the main factors influencing G-LOC/A-LOC.<b>Lan X, Zhu W, Du J, Wang J, Yang M, Xu Y, Cao Y. <i>High G tolerance and cardiopulmonary reserve function in healthy air force aviators</i>. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(12):911-916.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"94 12","pages":"911-916"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6297.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on whether cardiopulmonary reserve affects the risk of gravity-induced loss of consciousness (G-LOC) or almost loss of consciousness (A-LOC). Few previous studies have used cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to assess cardiopulmonary reserve function (CPRF) of fighter aviators. We compared CPET-related parameters in G-LOC/A-LOC and non-G-LOC/A-LOC fighter aviators to explore the effect of cardiopulmonary reserve function on G tolerance.METHODS: A total of 264 male fighter aviators with more than 500 h of flight experience participated in the study, all of whom underwent CPET and human centrifuge testing. We divided the aviators into two groups based on whether they experienced G-LOC/A-LOC during the human centrifuge test and compared the CPET parameters between the two groups.RESULTS: A total of 37 aviators (14%) experienced G-LOC/A-LOC. There were no significant differences in age (26.65 ± 4.30 vs. 26.01 ± 4.95), height (173.68 ± 4.21 vs. 173.55 ± 3.37), weight (69.51 ± 6.22 vs. 69.63 ± 6.01), or body mass index (23.06 ± 2.11 vs. 23.11 ± 1.82) between the two groups. Forced vital capacity (FVC) (4.95 ± 0.87 vs. 4.65 ± 0.79) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) divided by FVC (FEV1/FVC) (79.88 ± 7.24 vs. 83.72 ± 9.24) of pulmonary function of the G-LOC/A-LOC group was significantly lower than that of the non-G-LOC/A-LOC group. There was no significant difference in CPET-related parameters between the two groups.DISCUSSION: In conclusion, FEV1/FVC may be a factor affecting aviators' G-LOC/A-LOC, meaning aviators with slightly lower ventilation are more likely to experience G-LOC/A-LOC. However, oxygen uptake and exercise blood pressure, oxygen pulse, etc., may not be the main factors influencing G-LOC/A-LOC.Lan X, Zhu W, Du J, Wang J, Yang M, Xu Y, Cao Y. High G tolerance and cardiopulmonary reserve function in healthy air force aviators. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(12):911-916.
简介:关于心肺储备是否会影响重力所致意识丧失(G-LOC)或几乎丧失意识(A-LOC)的风险,目前还没有达成共识。以前很少有研究使用心肺运动测试(CPET)来评估战斗机飞行员的心肺储备功能(CPRF)。我们比较了 G-LOC/A-LOC 和非 G-LOC/A-LOC 战斗机飞行员的 CPET 相关参数,以探索心肺储备功能对 G 耐受力的影响。方法:共有 264 名飞行经验超过 500 小时的男性战斗机飞行员参与了研究,他们都接受了 CPET 和人体离心机测试。我们根据飞行员在人体离心机测试中是否出现 G-LOC/A-LOC 将其分为两组,并比较了两组的 CPET 参数。结果:共有 37 名飞行员(14%)出现 G-LOC/A-LOC。两组飞行员在年龄(26.65 ± 4.30 vs. 26.01 ± 4.95)、身高(173.68 ± 4.21 vs. 173.55 ± 3.37)、体重(69.51 ± 6.22 vs. 69.63 ± 6.01)或体重指数(23.06 ± 2.11 vs. 23.11 ± 1.82)方面无明显差异。G-LOC/A-LOC组肺活量(FVC)(4.95 ± 0.87 vs. 4.65 ± 0.79)和1秒内用力呼气容积(FEV1)除以FVC(FEV1/FVC)(79.88 ± 7.24 vs. 83.72 ± 9.24)显著低于非G-LOC/A-LOC组。讨论:总之,FEV1/FVC 可能是影响飞行员 G-LOC/A-LOC 的一个因素,这意味着通气量稍低的飞行员更容易出现 G-LOC/A-LOC。Lan X, Zhu W, Du J, Wang J, Yang M, Xu Y, Cao Y. High G tolerance and cardiopulmonary reserve function in healthy air force aviators.Aerosp Med Hum Perform.2023; 94(12):911-916.
期刊介绍:
The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.