Green trading and ecological sustainability under macroeconomic policy framework

IF 8.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yue Hu , Binhui Li , Munir Ahmad
{"title":"Green trading and ecological sustainability under macroeconomic policy framework","authors":"Yue Hu ,&nbsp;Binhui Li ,&nbsp;Munir Ahmad","doi":"10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When confronted with ecological challenges, trading ecologically friendly products involving<!--> <!-->renewable technologies, green management practices, and effluent treatment methods could alleviate ecological degradation on a global scale while considering the macroeconomic policy framework. Therefore, this study determines the effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policy instruments in moderating the relationship between green trade openness (i.e., trade in environmentally related products) and ecological sustainability. Applying panel quantile regression on data from 20 OECD members from 2003 to 2016, we found that green trade openness supports ecological sustainability through a gains-from-trade approach. Concerning moderation effects, expenditure-driven fiscal expansion reinforces the favorable influence of green trade openness on ecological sustainability across ecologically less/moderately efficient economies, while it does the reverse for ecologically more efficient members. Taxation-driven fiscal contraction promotes ecological sustainability amelioration impact of green trade openness for economies with below-average ecological quality and remains neutral for those with average/above-average ecological quality. Besides, interest rate-driven monetary contraction proliferates the ecological sustainability enhancement effect of green openness. We suggest that the fiscal and monetary policies demand unambiguous coordination with the OECD’s trade policy structure for optimal environmental outcomes of trading in environmental products. These insights would help OECD’s green trade policies gain momentum to facilitate the attainment of the Climate Action agenda of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12711,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience frontiers","volume":"15 3","pages":"Article 101776"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987123002438/pdfft?md5=f7db1240f90307debee532117f2dd06b&pid=1-s2.0-S1674987123002438-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987123002438","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When confronted with ecological challenges, trading ecologically friendly products involving renewable technologies, green management practices, and effluent treatment methods could alleviate ecological degradation on a global scale while considering the macroeconomic policy framework. Therefore, this study determines the effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policy instruments in moderating the relationship between green trade openness (i.e., trade in environmentally related products) and ecological sustainability. Applying panel quantile regression on data from 20 OECD members from 2003 to 2016, we found that green trade openness supports ecological sustainability through a gains-from-trade approach. Concerning moderation effects, expenditure-driven fiscal expansion reinforces the favorable influence of green trade openness on ecological sustainability across ecologically less/moderately efficient economies, while it does the reverse for ecologically more efficient members. Taxation-driven fiscal contraction promotes ecological sustainability amelioration impact of green trade openness for economies with below-average ecological quality and remains neutral for those with average/above-average ecological quality. Besides, interest rate-driven monetary contraction proliferates the ecological sustainability enhancement effect of green openness. We suggest that the fiscal and monetary policies demand unambiguous coordination with the OECD’s trade policy structure for optimal environmental outcomes of trading in environmental products. These insights would help OECD’s green trade policies gain momentum to facilitate the attainment of the Climate Action agenda of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

宏观经济政策框架下的绿色贸易和生态可持续性
在面临生态挑战时,涉及可再生技术、绿色管理方法和污水处理方法的生态友好型产品贸易可在考虑宏观经济政策框架的同时,缓解全球范围内的生态退化问题。因此,本研究确定了财政和货币政策工具在调节绿色贸易开放度(即环境相关产品贸易)与生态可持续性之间关系的有效性。通过对 20 个经合组织成员国 2003 年至 2016 年的数据进行面板量化回归,我们发现绿色贸易开放通过贸易收益法支持生态可持续性。关于调节效应,在生态效率较低/中等的经济体中,支出驱动的财政扩张加强了绿色贸易开放对生态可持续性的有利影响,而对生态效率较高的成员国则相反。对于生态质量低于平均水平的经济体来说,税收驱动的财政紧缩会促进绿色贸易开放对生态可持续性的改善影响,而对于生态质量处于平均水平/高于平均水平的经济体来说,这种影响保持中立。此外,利率驱动的货币紧缩会扩大绿色开放的生态可持续性增强效应。我们建议,财政和货币政策需要与经合组织的贸易政策结构明确协调,以实现环境产品贸易的最佳环境结果。这些见解将有助于经合组织的绿色贸易政策获得动力,促进联合国可持续发展目标中气候行动议程的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoscience frontiers
Geoscience frontiers Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
17.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
147
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Geoscience Frontiers (GSF) is the Journal of China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. It publishes peer-reviewed research articles and reviews in interdisciplinary fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences. GSF covers various research areas including petrology and geochemistry, lithospheric architecture and mantle dynamics, global tectonics, economic geology and fuel exploration, geophysics, stratigraphy and paleontology, environmental and engineering geology, astrogeology, and the nexus of resources-energy-emissions-climate under Sustainable Development Goals. The journal aims to bridge innovative, provocative, and challenging concepts and models in these fields, providing insights on correlations and evolution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信