Association between antithrombotic therapy and mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID‑19

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Xing Wang, Wuqian Chen, Jiulin Guo, Xingyu Qiu, Chao You, Lu Ma
{"title":"Association between antithrombotic therapy and mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID‑19","authors":"Xing Wang, Wuqian Chen, Jiulin Guo, Xingyu Qiu, Chao You, Lu Ma","doi":"10.1186/s12959-023-00572-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prothrombotic state is a common abnormality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is controversy over the use of anticoagulants, especially oral anticoagulants (OAC) due to limited studies. We sought to evaluate the association between antithrombotic therapy on mortality and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 through propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. A retrospective cohort study was performed to include adult patients with COVID-19 in a university hospital. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization. PSM was used as a powerful tool for matching patients’ baseline characteristics. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from the models. Of 4,881 COVID-19 patients during the study period, 690 (14.1%) patients received antithrombotic therapy and 4,191 (85.9%) patients were under no antithrombotic therapy. After adjustment with multivariate regression analysis, patients receiving OAC, compared with those who did not receive any antithrombotic therapy, had significantly lower odds for in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.46. 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.87; P= 0.017). PSM analysis observed similar results (aOR: 0.35. 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.61; P< 0.001). Moreover, in critically ill patients who received mechanical ventilation, antithrombotic treatment (aOR: 0.54. 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.89; P= 0.022) was associated with reduced risk of mortality. The application OACs was associated with reduced hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation requirement in COVID-19 patients. Besides, antithrombotic treatment was associated with a reduction in in-hospital mortality among critically ill COVID-19 patients who required mechanical ventilation.","PeriodicalId":22982,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-023-00572-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prothrombotic state is a common abnormality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is controversy over the use of anticoagulants, especially oral anticoagulants (OAC) due to limited studies. We sought to evaluate the association between antithrombotic therapy on mortality and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 through propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. A retrospective cohort study was performed to include adult patients with COVID-19 in a university hospital. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization. PSM was used as a powerful tool for matching patients’ baseline characteristics. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from the models. Of 4,881 COVID-19 patients during the study period, 690 (14.1%) patients received antithrombotic therapy and 4,191 (85.9%) patients were under no antithrombotic therapy. After adjustment with multivariate regression analysis, patients receiving OAC, compared with those who did not receive any antithrombotic therapy, had significantly lower odds for in-hospital mortality (aOR: 0.46. 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.87; P= 0.017). PSM analysis observed similar results (aOR: 0.35. 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.61; P< 0.001). Moreover, in critically ill patients who received mechanical ventilation, antithrombotic treatment (aOR: 0.54. 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.89; P= 0.022) was associated with reduced risk of mortality. The application OACs was associated with reduced hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation requirement in COVID-19 patients. Besides, antithrombotic treatment was associated with a reduction in in-hospital mortality among critically ill COVID-19 patients who required mechanical ventilation.
抗血栓治疗与 COVID-19 住院患者死亡率之间的关系
血栓前状态是2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者常见的异常现象。然而,由于研究有限,对抗凝剂尤其是口服抗凝剂(OAC)的使用存在争议。我们试图通过倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析,评估抗血栓治疗与 COVID-19 住院患者的死亡率和临床结局之间的关系。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了一家大学医院的 COVID-19 成年患者。主要结果是院内死亡率。次要结果包括入住重症监护室(ICU)、机械通气和住院期间急性肾损伤(AKI)。PSM 是匹配患者基线特征的有力工具。根据模型计算出调整后的几率比(aOR)和 95% 的置信区间(CI)。在研究期间的4881名COVID-19患者中,690名(14.1%)患者接受了抗血栓治疗,4191名(85.9%)患者未接受抗血栓治疗。经多变量回归分析调整后,与未接受任何抗血栓治疗的患者相比,接受 OAC 治疗的患者院内死亡几率明显降低(aOR:0.46;95% CI:0.24 至 0.87;P= 0.017)。PSM 分析也观察到类似的结果(aOR:0.35;95% CI:0.19 至 0.61;P< 0.001)。此外,在接受机械通气的重症患者中,抗血栓治疗(aOR:0.54;95% CI:0.32 至 0.89;P= 0.022)与死亡风险降低有关。在 COVID-19 患者中,应用 OACs 与降低住院死亡率和机械通气需求有关。此外,在需要机械通气的 COVID-19 重症患者中,抗血栓治疗与院内死亡率的降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thrombosis Journal
Thrombosis Journal Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
69
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Journal is an open-access journal that publishes original articles on aspects of clinical and basic research, new methodology, case reports and reviews in the areas of thrombosis. Topics of particular interest include the diagnosis of arterial and venous thrombosis, new antithrombotic treatments, new developments in the understanding, diagnosis and treatments of atherosclerotic vessel disease, relations between haemostasis and vascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, immunology and obesity.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信