Changes in activities-specific balance confidence of active unilateral transtibial prosthesis users after provision of a self-aligning ankle foot.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Fiona Davie-Smith, Lynne Powell, Nikki Porteous, Bruce Carse
{"title":"Changes in activities-specific balance confidence of active unilateral transtibial prosthesis users after provision of a self-aligning ankle foot.","authors":"Fiona Davie-Smith, Lynne Powell, Nikki Porteous, Bruce Carse","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-aligning ankle feet have an increased range of motion and are marketed to improve compliance over uneven terrain and increase function and balance; however, much of the existing literature focuses on the biomechanical aspect of these prostheses as opposed to patient-reported measures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare activities-specific balance confidence (ABC), health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), perceived mobility, gait speed, and step length before and after provision of a self-aligning ankle foot in the active unilateral transtibial prosthesis user.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient-reported and functional measures were captured for 85 users who were provided with a self-aligning ankle foot. Measures were recorded immediately before self-aligning ankle foot provision and again at 6 months afterward. The primary outcome was the ABC Score, along with the following secondary measures; HR-QoL using EQ-5D-5L Health Index Prosthetic Limb User Survey of Mobility and 10-meter timed walk test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the cohort was 55.2 years old and 71% were males, with the majority having their transtibial amputation due to trauma. There was a statistically significant improvement in ABC from 76 to 86% (p < 0.001) with a medium effect size. There was no statistically significant improvement in HR-QoL (p = 0.051), Prosthetic Limb User Survey of Mobility (p = 0.043), time taken to walk 10 m (p = 0.15) and step length (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self aligning ankle feet increased ABC and step length with no detrimental effect on HR-QoL, perceived mobility or walking speed in those with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-aligning ankle feet have an increased range of motion and are marketed to improve compliance over uneven terrain and increase function and balance; however, much of the existing literature focuses on the biomechanical aspect of these prostheses as opposed to patient-reported measures.

Objective: To compare activities-specific balance confidence (ABC), health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), perceived mobility, gait speed, and step length before and after provision of a self-aligning ankle foot in the active unilateral transtibial prosthesis user.

Study design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

Methods: Patient-reported and functional measures were captured for 85 users who were provided with a self-aligning ankle foot. Measures were recorded immediately before self-aligning ankle foot provision and again at 6 months afterward. The primary outcome was the ABC Score, along with the following secondary measures; HR-QoL using EQ-5D-5L Health Index Prosthetic Limb User Survey of Mobility and 10-meter timed walk test.

Results: The median age of the cohort was 55.2 years old and 71% were males, with the majority having their transtibial amputation due to trauma. There was a statistically significant improvement in ABC from 76 to 86% (p < 0.001) with a medium effect size. There was no statistically significant improvement in HR-QoL (p = 0.051), Prosthetic Limb User Survey of Mobility (p = 0.043), time taken to walk 10 m (p = 0.15) and step length (p = 0.003).

Conclusions: Self aligning ankle feet increased ABC and step length with no detrimental effect on HR-QoL, perceived mobility or walking speed in those with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation.

单侧经胫假肢使用者在安装自动对齐踝足后特定活动平衡信心的变化。
背景:自调式踝足具有更大的活动范围,其市场定位是改善不平坦地形上的顺应性并增强功能和平衡;然而,现有文献大多侧重于这些假肢的生物力学方面,而非患者报告的测量指标:比较单侧经胫假肢使用者在安装自调式踝足前后的特定活动平衡信心(ABC)、健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)、感知活动能力、步速和步长:研究设计:对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析:方法:对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。收集了 85 名安装了自调式踝足的用户的患者报告和功能测量数据。在提供自调式踝足之前和之后的 6 个月内,均记录了测量数据。主要结果是 ABC 评分,以及以下次要测量指标:使用 EQ-5D-5L 健康指数进行的 HR-QoL 人造肢体用户活动能力调查和 10 米定时步行测试:组群的中位年龄为 55.2 岁,71% 为男性,大多数人因外伤导致经胫骨截肢。ABC从76%提高到86%(P<0.001),在统计学上有明显改善,效果中等。HR-QoL(p = 0.051)、假肢使用者活动能力调查(p = 0.043)、步行 10 米所需时间(p = 0.15)和步长(p = 0.003)均无统计学意义上的明显改善:结论:对于单侧经胫骨截肢者而言,自对齐踝足增加了ABC和步长,但对心率-质量-生活水平、感知活动能力或行走速度没有不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信