Drawing as an efficient encoding tool in younger but not always older adults: The case of associative memory.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Memory & Cognition Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-04 DOI:10.3758/s13421-023-01503-6
Rebecca Ovalle-Fresa, Corinna S Martarelli
{"title":"Drawing as an efficient encoding tool in younger but not always older adults: The case of associative memory.","authors":"Rebecca Ovalle-Fresa, Corinna S Martarelli","doi":"10.3758/s13421-023-01503-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Episodic memory strongly declines in healthy aging, at least partly because of reduced abilities to create and remember associations (associative memory) and to use efficient memory strategies. Several studies have shown that drawing the to-be-remembered material is a reliable encoding tool to enhance memory of individual items (item memory) because it simultaneously integrates elaborative, pictorial, and motoric processes. These processes in isolation can enhance associative memory in older adults. Nevertheless, their simultaneous impact on associative memory has never been investigated in drawing as an encoding tool. We aimed to investigate whether drawing as an encoding tool not only enhances item memory, but whether its benefit extends to associative memory in younger and older adults. Therefore, we tested 101 older and 100 younger participants in two online experiments and one in-person experiment. Using a memory task for unrelated word-pairs, we compared relational drawing and repeatedly writing (non-relational) as encoding tools and assessed immediate recognition memory of items and associations. In Experiment 2, we additionally assessed recognition memory after 1 week. The findings were consistent across the three experiments: while younger participants benefited from drawing over writing in item and associative memory, older participants benefited in item but not in associative memory. The observed effects remained after 1 week. Thus, we could extend the benefit of drawing to relational drawing in associative memory in younger adults. The lack of benefit in older adults' associative memory might be explained by age-related difficulties in benefiting from memory strategies, and in creating and retrieving associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48398,"journal":{"name":"Memory & Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"299-324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-023-01503-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Episodic memory strongly declines in healthy aging, at least partly because of reduced abilities to create and remember associations (associative memory) and to use efficient memory strategies. Several studies have shown that drawing the to-be-remembered material is a reliable encoding tool to enhance memory of individual items (item memory) because it simultaneously integrates elaborative, pictorial, and motoric processes. These processes in isolation can enhance associative memory in older adults. Nevertheless, their simultaneous impact on associative memory has never been investigated in drawing as an encoding tool. We aimed to investigate whether drawing as an encoding tool not only enhances item memory, but whether its benefit extends to associative memory in younger and older adults. Therefore, we tested 101 older and 100 younger participants in two online experiments and one in-person experiment. Using a memory task for unrelated word-pairs, we compared relational drawing and repeatedly writing (non-relational) as encoding tools and assessed immediate recognition memory of items and associations. In Experiment 2, we additionally assessed recognition memory after 1 week. The findings were consistent across the three experiments: while younger participants benefited from drawing over writing in item and associative memory, older participants benefited in item but not in associative memory. The observed effects remained after 1 week. Thus, we could extend the benefit of drawing to relational drawing in associative memory in younger adults. The lack of benefit in older adults' associative memory might be explained by age-related difficulties in benefiting from memory strategies, and in creating and retrieving associations.

Abstract Image

绘画是年轻人的高效编码工具,但不一定是老年人的高效编码工具:联想记忆的案例。
外显记忆在健康老龄化过程中会严重衰退,至少部分原因是创造和记忆联想(联想记忆)以及使用高效记忆策略的能力下降。多项研究表明,绘制待记忆材料是一种可靠的编码工具,可以增强对单个项目的记忆(项目记忆),因为它同时整合了阐述、图像和运动过程。这些单独的过程可以增强老年人的联想记忆。然而,在将绘画作为编码工具的过程中,还从未研究过它们同时对联想记忆产生的影响。我们的目的是研究绘画作为一种编码工具是否不仅能增强项目记忆,而且还能增强年轻人和老年人的联想记忆。因此,我们在两个在线实验和一个现场实验中分别对 101 名老年人和 100 名年轻人进行了测试。我们使用无关词对的记忆任务,比较了作为编码工具的关系图画和重复书写(非关系),并评估了项目和联想的即时识别记忆。在实验 2 中,我们还评估了一周后的识别记忆。三个实验的结果是一致的:在项目记忆和联想记忆中,年龄较小的参与者从绘画中获益多于书写,而年龄较大的参与者在项目记忆中获益多于书写,但在联想记忆中却没有获益。观察到的效果在一周后依然存在。因此,我们可以将绘画的益处扩展到年轻成人联想记忆中的关系绘画。老年人在联想记忆中没有获益的原因可能与年龄有关,他们难以从记忆策略中获益,也难以建立和检索联想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory & Cognition
Memory & Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Memory & Cognition covers human memory and learning, conceptual processes, psycholinguistics, problem solving, thinking, decision making, and skilled performance, including relevant work in the areas of computer simulation, information processing, mathematical psychology, developmental psychology, and experimental social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信