Maureen Boudrot, Philippe François, Sarah Abdel-Gawad, Jean-Pierre Attal, Claire-Adeline Dantagnan
{"title":"Shear bond strength of a RMGIC for orthodontic bracket bonding to enamel.","authors":"Maureen Boudrot, Philippe François, Sarah Abdel-Gawad, Jean-Pierre Attal, Claire-Adeline Dantagnan","doi":"10.1038/s41405-023-00181-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of a restorative resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) for orthodontic bracket bonding.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred twenty-one human teeth were randomly divided into 11 groups (n = 11) according to the surface treatment applied (H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> ± Transbond Plus (TSEP) or Scotchbond Universal (SU)), and the adhesive used (Riva LC HV (RIVA), Fuji Ortho (FUJI), and Transbond XT (TXT)). For each sample, a metal button was bonded. SBS tests were performed at 1 week and debonded specimens were observed for failure modes determination. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used to compare SBS differences and Fisher's exact test to analyze the failure modes (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TSEP + FUJI and H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> + SU + TXT showed the highest SBS values while H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> + TSEP + RIVA showed the lowest value. Cohesive failure and mixed failure were found in the groups with SU and TXT and adhesive failure in the other groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusions: </strong>The bonding of orthodontic attachments to enamel could be performed with any of the three materials studied. The use of a universal adhesive in the bonding protocol could optimize the adhesion values. Clinical studies would be needed to confirm the results obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10762087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-023-00181-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of a restorative resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) for orthodontic bracket bonding.
Materials and methods: One hundred twenty-one human teeth were randomly divided into 11 groups (n = 11) according to the surface treatment applied (H3PO4 ± Transbond Plus (TSEP) or Scotchbond Universal (SU)), and the adhesive used (Riva LC HV (RIVA), Fuji Ortho (FUJI), and Transbond XT (TXT)). For each sample, a metal button was bonded. SBS tests were performed at 1 week and debonded specimens were observed for failure modes determination. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used to compare SBS differences and Fisher's exact test to analyze the failure modes (p < 0.05).
Results: TSEP + FUJI and H3PO4 + SU + TXT showed the highest SBS values while H3PO4 + TSEP + RIVA showed the lowest value. Cohesive failure and mixed failure were found in the groups with SU and TXT and adhesive failure in the other groups.
Discussion/conclusions: The bonding of orthodontic attachments to enamel could be performed with any of the three materials studied. The use of a universal adhesive in the bonding protocol could optimize the adhesion values. Clinical studies would be needed to confirm the results obtained.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
