Prolonged Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Thrombohemorrhagic Risk in Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera Patients Treated with Long-Term Aspirin: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1159/000535078
Ivan Krečak, Ljerka Pivac, Hrvoje Holik, Martina Morić Perić, Ivan Zekanović, Eva Čubrić, Marko Skelin, Marko Lucijanić
{"title":"Prolonged Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Thrombohemorrhagic Risk in Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera Patients Treated with Long-Term Aspirin: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Ivan Krečak, Ljerka Pivac, Hrvoje Holik, Martina Morić Perić, Ivan Zekanović, Eva Čubrić, Marko Skelin, Marko Lucijanić","doi":"10.1159/000535078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to decrease the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential pharmacodynamic interactions of PPIs and antiplatelet drugs with respect to cardiovascular risk. Patients with BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and polycythemia vera (PV) often suffer from peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and frequently receive low-dose aspirin due to an intrinsically high thrombotic risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective multicenter study from a community setting investigated whether continuous PPI use may affect thrombohemorrhagic risk in ET and PV patients treated with long-term aspirin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four aspirin-treated MPN patients (ET = 36, PV = 58) were included; median age was 69.5 years (range 21-92) and 40 (42.6%) were males. Nineteen (20.2%) patients continuously received PPIs and pantoprazole (n = 15, 78.9%) was the most frequently received PPI. PV phenotype (p = 0.085), male sex (p = 0.011), and prior thrombosis (p = 0.005) were associated with PPI use, whereas no correlations were found with respect to age, disease risk, splenomegaly, mutational status, constitutional symptoms, cardiovascular risk factors, cytoreductive treatment, or any of the blood cell counts (p &gt; 0.050 for all analyses). The median follow-up time was 55.5 months; 19 (20.2%) thrombotic and 13 (13.8%) bleeding events occurred during this time. The use of PPIs was not associated with an increased risk of thrombosis (p = 0.158) or overall bleeding (p = 0.229) and none of the patients treated with PPIs experienced GI bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering that Helicobacter pylori infection and PUD are quite frequent in ET and PV patients, these preliminary results may provide some reassurance to physicians regarding the absence of thrombohemorrhagic risk associated with prolonged PPI use in MPN patients treated with long-term aspirin. Our observations may be even more important in the light of recent evidence suggesting suboptimal platelet inhibition in ET with once-daily when compared to twice- or triple-daily aspirin which may also cause more abdominal discomfort. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design, limited number of patients included, and the lack of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":20209,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"110-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to decrease the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential pharmacodynamic interactions of PPIs and antiplatelet drugs with respect to cardiovascular risk. Patients with BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and polycythemia vera (PV) often suffer from peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and frequently receive low-dose aspirin due to an intrinsically high thrombotic risk.

Method: This retrospective multicenter study from a community setting investigated whether continuous PPI use may affect thrombohemorrhagic risk in ET and PV patients treated with long-term aspirin.

Results: Ninety-four aspirin-treated MPN patients (ET = 36, PV = 58) were included; median age was 69.5 years (range 21-92) and 40 (42.6%) were males. Nineteen (20.2%) patients continuously received PPIs and pantoprazole (n = 15, 78.9%) was the most frequently received PPI. PV phenotype (p = 0.085), male sex (p = 0.011), and prior thrombosis (p = 0.005) were associated with PPI use, whereas no correlations were found with respect to age, disease risk, splenomegaly, mutational status, constitutional symptoms, cardiovascular risk factors, cytoreductive treatment, or any of the blood cell counts (p > 0.050 for all analyses). The median follow-up time was 55.5 months; 19 (20.2%) thrombotic and 13 (13.8%) bleeding events occurred during this time. The use of PPIs was not associated with an increased risk of thrombosis (p = 0.158) or overall bleeding (p = 0.229) and none of the patients treated with PPIs experienced GI bleeding.

Conclusions: Considering that Helicobacter pylori infection and PUD are quite frequent in ET and PV patients, these preliminary results may provide some reassurance to physicians regarding the absence of thrombohemorrhagic risk associated with prolonged PPI use in MPN patients treated with long-term aspirin. Our observations may be even more important in the light of recent evidence suggesting suboptimal platelet inhibition in ET with once-daily when compared to twice- or triple-daily aspirin which may also cause more abdominal discomfort. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design, limited number of patients included, and the lack of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessments.

长期使用阿司匹林治疗的原发性血小板增多症和多发性红细胞症患者长期使用质子泵抑制剂与血栓性出血风险:一项试点研究。
导言:众所周知,质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)可降低胃肠道(GI)出血的风险。然而,人们对 PPIs 和抗血小板药物在心血管风险方面的潜在药效学相互作用表示担忧。BCR::ABL1阴性骨髓增殖性肿瘤(MPNs)、原发性血小板增多症(ET)和真性红细胞增多症(PV)患者通常患有消化性溃疡病(PUD),由于其本身具有较高的血栓风险,因此经常服用小剂量阿司匹林:这项社区多中心回顾性研究调查了持续服用 PPI 是否会影响长期服用阿司匹林的 ET 和 PV 患者的血栓出血风险:研究纳入了94名接受阿司匹林治疗的MPN患者(ET=36人,PV=58人);中位年龄为69.5岁(21-92岁),男性40人(42.6%)。19例(20.2%)患者持续服用PPIs,泮托拉唑(15例,78.9%)是最常服用的PPI。PV表型(p = 0.085)、男性性别(p = 0.011)和既往血栓形成(p = 0.005)与PPI的使用有关,而与年龄、疾病风险、脾脏肿大、突变状态、体征、心血管风险因素、细胞再生治疗或任何血细胞计数均无相关性(所有分析的p均为0.050)。中位随访时间为 55.5 个月;期间发生了 19 起(20.2%)血栓事件和 13 起(13.8%)出血事件。使用 PPIs 与血栓形成(p = 0.158)或总体出血(p = 0.229)风险的增加无关,使用 PPIs 治疗的患者中没有人发生消化道出血:考虑到幽门螺杆菌感染和 PUD 在 ET 和 PV 患者中十分常见,这些初步结果可以让医生放心,长期服用阿司匹林的 MPN 患者长期服用 PPI 不会导致血栓出血风险。最近有证据表明,与每天服用两次或三次阿司匹林相比,每天服用一次阿司匹林对 ET 的血小板抑制效果欠佳,而每天服用两次或三次阿司匹林可能会引起更多腹部不适,因此我们的观察结果可能更为重要。本研究的局限性在于其回顾性设计、纳入的患者人数有限以及缺乏药效学和药代动力学评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacology
Pharmacology 医学-药学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Pharmacology'' is an international forum to present and discuss current perspectives in drug research. The journal communicates research in basic and clinical pharmacology and related fields. It covers biochemical pharmacology, molecular pharmacology, immunopharmacology, drug metabolism, pharmacogenetics, analytical toxicology, neuropsychopharmacology, pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology. In addition to original papers and short communications of investigative findings and pharmacological profiles the journal contains reviews, comments and perspective notes; research communications of novel therapeutic agents are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信