Genetic ancestry and diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in a diverse population.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Yusuph Mavura, Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil, Ugur Hodoglugil, Mark Kvale, Pierre-Marie Martin, Jessica Van Ziffle, W Patrick Devine, Sara L Ackerman, Barbara A Koenig, Pui-Yan Kwok, Mary E Norton, Anne Slavotinek, Neil Risch
{"title":"Genetic ancestry and diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in a diverse population.","authors":"Yusuph Mavura, Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil, Ugur Hodoglugil, Mark Kvale, Pierre-Marie Martin, Jessica Van Ziffle, W Patrick Devine, Sara L Ackerman, Barbara A Koenig, Pui-Yan Kwok, Mary E Norton, Anne Slavotinek, Neil Risch","doi":"10.1038/s41525-023-00385-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been suggested that diagnostic yield (DY) from Exome Sequencing (ES) may be lower among patients with non-European ancestries than those with European ancestry. We examined the association of DY with estimated continental/subcontinental genetic ancestry in a racially/ethnically diverse pediatric and prenatal clinical cohort. Cases (N = 845) with suspected genetic disorders underwent ES for diagnosis. Continental/subcontinental genetic ancestry proportions were estimated from the ES data. We compared the distribution of genetic ancestries in positive, negative, and inconclusive cases by Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and linear associations of ancestry with DY by Cochran-Armitage trend tests. We observed no reduction in overall DY associated with any genetic ancestry (African, Native American, East Asian, European, Middle Eastern, South Asian). However, we observed a relative increase in proportion of autosomal recessive homozygous inheritance versus other inheritance patterns associated with Middle Eastern and South Asian ancestry, due to consanguinity. In this empirical study of ES for undiagnosed pediatric and prenatal genetic conditions, genetic ancestry was not associated with the likelihood of a positive diagnosis, supporting the equitable use of ES in diagnosis of previously undiagnosed but potentially Mendelian disorders across all ancestral populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19273,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Genomic Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Genomic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-023-00385-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has been suggested that diagnostic yield (DY) from Exome Sequencing (ES) may be lower among patients with non-European ancestries than those with European ancestry. We examined the association of DY with estimated continental/subcontinental genetic ancestry in a racially/ethnically diverse pediatric and prenatal clinical cohort. Cases (N = 845) with suspected genetic disorders underwent ES for diagnosis. Continental/subcontinental genetic ancestry proportions were estimated from the ES data. We compared the distribution of genetic ancestries in positive, negative, and inconclusive cases by Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and linear associations of ancestry with DY by Cochran-Armitage trend tests. We observed no reduction in overall DY associated with any genetic ancestry (African, Native American, East Asian, European, Middle Eastern, South Asian). However, we observed a relative increase in proportion of autosomal recessive homozygous inheritance versus other inheritance patterns associated with Middle Eastern and South Asian ancestry, due to consanguinity. In this empirical study of ES for undiagnosed pediatric and prenatal genetic conditions, genetic ancestry was not associated with the likelihood of a positive diagnosis, supporting the equitable use of ES in diagnosis of previously undiagnosed but potentially Mendelian disorders across all ancestral populations.

Abstract Image

不同人群的遗传祖先和外显子组测序的诊断率。
有人认为,外显子组测序(ES)的诊断率(DY)在非欧洲血统患者中可能低于欧洲血统患者。我们在一个种族/民族多元化的儿科和产前临床队列中研究了DY与估计的大陆/次大陆遗传血统的关联。疑似遗传性疾病的病例(N = 845)接受了 ES 诊断。根据 ES 数据估算出大陆/次大陆遗传血统比例。我们通过 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验比较了阳性、阴性和不确定病例的遗传血统分布,并通过 Cochran-Armitage 趋势检验比较了遗传血统与 DY 的线性关系。我们没有观察到任何遗传血统(非洲人、美洲原住民、东亚人、欧洲人、中东人、南亚人)导致的总体 DY 减少。不过,我们观察到,由于近亲结婚,常染色体隐性同基因遗传的比例相对于其他与中东和南亚血统相关的遗传模式有所增加。在这项针对未确诊儿科和产前遗传病的 ES 实证研究中,遗传血统与获得阳性诊断的可能性无关,这支持了在所有祖先人群中公平使用 ES 诊断先前未确诊但可能是孟德尔疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Genomic Medicine
NPJ Genomic Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
67
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Genomic Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing the most important scientific advances in all aspects of genomics and its application in the practice of medicine. The journal defines genomic medicine as "diagnosis, prognosis, prevention and/or treatment of disease and disorders of the mind and body, using approaches informed or enabled by knowledge of the genome and the molecules it encodes." Relevant and high-impact papers that encompass studies of individuals, families, or populations are considered for publication. An emphasis will include coupling detailed phenotype and genome sequencing information, both enabled by new technologies and informatics, to delineate the underlying aetiology of disease. Clinical recommendations and/or guidelines of how that data should be used in the clinical management of those patients in the study, and others, are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信