Fine-needle aspiration of amyloidoma: A critical analysis

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Nisha S. Ramani MD, Bhuvaneswari Krishnan MD
{"title":"Fine-needle aspiration of amyloidoma: A critical analysis","authors":"Nisha S. Ramani MD,&nbsp;Bhuvaneswari Krishnan MD","doi":"10.1002/cncy.22784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Amyloid, presenting as a mass, is termed amyloidoma. Among the reported cases, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of amyloid is often misinterpreted as acellular nondiagnostic material.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A computer search of all FNAs was performed and cases diagnosed as amyloidoma were identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 11,956 cases and 20,634 FNAs, there were six cases and 12 FNAs of amyloidoma. One case with mucin/myxoid matrix was misinterpreted as amyloid, which on our review was Congo red negative. All five other cases of amyloidoma were adequate for evaluation. The smears showed most of the aspirated contents in the middle of the slide and it did not spread when smeared. The amyloid was present as large chunks of waxy, smooth, orangophilic/cyanophilic fragments on Papanicolaou stain and as basophilic fragments on Diff-Quik stain in a clean background. In cases with lymphoma/myeloma, there were admixed lymphocytes and/or plasma cells. Unlike fibrous tissue, amyloid aspirates well and provides adequate material for interpretation. The clean background distinguishes it from mucin/myxoid matrix. Congo red stain was positive with apple green birefringence in all five cases. Further subtyping by mass spectrometry showed AL (κ) type in three patients and AIns (insulin) type in one patient. In one patient with lymphoma, the subtyping was not done.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>FNA of amyloidoma is rare (0.04%), but an optimal method for diagnosis and subtyping, avoiding unwanted surgical interventions. Although mistaken for fibrous tissue, which aspirates poorly, abundant acellular orangophilic/cyanophilic material on FNA should raise a suspicion for amyloid. Unlike mucin/myxoid matrix, amyloid does not smear the background.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9410,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncy.22784","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Amyloid, presenting as a mass, is termed amyloidoma. Among the reported cases, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of amyloid is often misinterpreted as acellular nondiagnostic material.

Methods

A computer search of all FNAs was performed and cases diagnosed as amyloidoma were identified.

Results

Among 11,956 cases and 20,634 FNAs, there were six cases and 12 FNAs of amyloidoma. One case with mucin/myxoid matrix was misinterpreted as amyloid, which on our review was Congo red negative. All five other cases of amyloidoma were adequate for evaluation. The smears showed most of the aspirated contents in the middle of the slide and it did not spread when smeared. The amyloid was present as large chunks of waxy, smooth, orangophilic/cyanophilic fragments on Papanicolaou stain and as basophilic fragments on Diff-Quik stain in a clean background. In cases with lymphoma/myeloma, there were admixed lymphocytes and/or plasma cells. Unlike fibrous tissue, amyloid aspirates well and provides adequate material for interpretation. The clean background distinguishes it from mucin/myxoid matrix. Congo red stain was positive with apple green birefringence in all five cases. Further subtyping by mass spectrometry showed AL (κ) type in three patients and AIns (insulin) type in one patient. In one patient with lymphoma, the subtyping was not done.

Conclusion

FNA of amyloidoma is rare (0.04%), but an optimal method for diagnosis and subtyping, avoiding unwanted surgical interventions. Although mistaken for fibrous tissue, which aspirates poorly, abundant acellular orangophilic/cyanophilic material on FNA should raise a suspicion for amyloid. Unlike mucin/myxoid matrix, amyloid does not smear the background.

淀粉样变性瘤的细针穿刺:批判性分析。
背景:表现为肿块的淀粉样蛋白被称为淀粉样变性瘤。在报告的病例中,细针穿刺(FNA)抽取的淀粉样蛋白常被误认为是无细胞的非诊断性物质:方法:对所有 FNA 进行计算机检索,找出诊断为淀粉样变性的病例:结果:在11956个病例和20634个FNA中,有6个病例和12个FNA被诊断为淀粉样变性瘤。其中一例粘蛋白/类粘液基质被误诊为淀粉样变性,经我们复查,该病例为刚果红阴性。其他五例淀粉样变瘤均可进行评估。涂片显示大部分吸出物位于玻片中央,涂抹时不会扩散。在巴氏染色法中,淀粉样蛋白呈大块蜡样、光滑、嗜兰/嗜青碎片;在Diff-Quik染色法中,淀粉样蛋白呈嗜碱性碎片,背景干净。在淋巴瘤/骨髓瘤病例中,会出现混合淋巴细胞和/或浆细胞。与纤维组织不同,淀粉样蛋白能很好地吸出,并提供足够的材料进行解读。干净的背景可将其与粘蛋白/类粘液基质区分开来。在所有五个病例中,刚果红染色均呈阳性,并伴有苹果绿双折射。通过质谱分析进行的进一步亚型鉴定显示,三名患者为 AL(κ)型,一名患者为 AIns(胰岛素)型。一名淋巴瘤患者未进行亚型鉴定:结论:淀粉样变性瘤的 FNA 很罕见(0.04%),但却是诊断和分型的最佳方法,可避免不必要的手术干预。虽然被误认为是纤维组织(吸出效果不佳),但 FNA 上的大量嗜橙皮色/嗜青色物质应引起对淀粉样蛋白的怀疑。与粘蛋白/类粘液基质不同,淀粉样蛋白不会弄脏背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Cytopathology
Cancer Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
17.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Cytopathology provides a unique forum for interaction and dissemination of original research and educational information relevant to the practice of cytopathology and its related oncologic disciplines. The journal strives to have a positive effect on cancer prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and cure by the publication of high-quality content. The mission of Cancer Cytopathology is to present and inform readers of new applications, technological advances, cutting-edge research, novel applications of molecular techniques, and relevant review articles related to cytopathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信