Surgical treatment of deep endometriosis: Impact on spontaneous conception

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Georgios Grigoriadis , Angelos Daniilidis , Benjamin Merlot , Konstantinos Stratakis , Thomas Dennis , Adrien Crestani , Isabella Chanavaz-Lacheray , Horace Roman
{"title":"Surgical treatment of deep endometriosis: Impact on spontaneous conception","authors":"Georgios Grigoriadis ,&nbsp;Angelos Daniilidis ,&nbsp;Benjamin Merlot ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Stratakis ,&nbsp;Thomas Dennis ,&nbsp;Adrien Crestani ,&nbsp;Isabella Chanavaz-Lacheray ,&nbsp;Horace Roman","doi":"10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Deep endometriosis (DE) is the most severe form of endometriosis and is commonly associated with infertility. Surgical treatment of DE appears to increase chances of spontaneous conception in appropriately selected patients wishing to conceive. Identifying, however, the exact impact of DE, and its surgical removal, on natural conception is highly challenging. The surgical approach should be favoured in symptomatic patients with pregnancy intention. Limited data from infertile patients suggest that outcomes may not differ from patients without known infertility. Complex DE surgery carries a risk of serious complications, therefore, it should be performed in centers of expertise. Such complications may, however, not have a significant negative impact on fertility outcomes, according to limited available data. Data on </span>obstetric<span> outcomes of spontaneous conceptions after DE surgery are too scarce. In asymptomatic, infertile patients the debate between primary surgery or Artifial Reproductive Technology is ongoing, until randomized studies report their results.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50732,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 102455"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521693424000014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep endometriosis (DE) is the most severe form of endometriosis and is commonly associated with infertility. Surgical treatment of DE appears to increase chances of spontaneous conception in appropriately selected patients wishing to conceive. Identifying, however, the exact impact of DE, and its surgical removal, on natural conception is highly challenging. The surgical approach should be favoured in symptomatic patients with pregnancy intention. Limited data from infertile patients suggest that outcomes may not differ from patients without known infertility. Complex DE surgery carries a risk of serious complications, therefore, it should be performed in centers of expertise. Such complications may, however, not have a significant negative impact on fertility outcomes, according to limited available data. Data on obstetric outcomes of spontaneous conceptions after DE surgery are too scarce. In asymptomatic, infertile patients the debate between primary surgery or Artifial Reproductive Technology is ongoing, until randomized studies report their results.

深部子宫内膜异位症的手术治疗:对自然受孕的影响
深部子宫内膜异位症(DE)是最严重的子宫内膜异位症,通常与不孕症有关。对深部子宫内膜异位症进行手术治疗似乎可以增加经过适当选择的希望受孕的患者自然受孕的机会。然而,确定 DE 及其手术切除对自然受孕的确切影响极具挑战性。对于有怀孕意愿的无症状患者,应首选手术方法。来自不孕患者的有限数据表明,其结果可能与已知不孕患者无异。复杂的卵巢切除手术存在严重并发症的风险,因此应在专业中心进行。不过,根据现有的有限数据,此类并发症可能不会对生育结果产生重大负面影响。有关自然受孕的产科结果的数据太少。对于无症状的不孕患者,在随机研究报告结果出来之前,是选择初级手术还是人工生殖技术的争论仍在继续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
113
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: In practical paperback format, each 200 page topic-based issue of Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology will provide a comprehensive review of current clinical practice and thinking within the specialties of obstetrics and gynaecology. All chapters take the form of practical, evidence-based reviews that seek to address key clinical issues of diagnosis, treatment and patient management. Each issue follows a problem-orientated approach that focuses on the key questions to be addressed, clearly defining what is known and not known. Management will be described in practical terms so that it can be applied to the individual patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信