Treatment-related beliefs and reactions among trauma-focused therapy completers and discontinuers: A qualitative examination.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychological Services Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1037/ser0000831
Elizabeth Alpert, Alexandra Gowdy-Jaehnig, Tara E Galovski, Laura A Meis, Melissa A Polusny, Princess E Ackland, Michele Spoont, Helen Valenstein-Mah, Robert J Orazem, Paula P Schnurr, Kathleen M Chard, Shannon M Kehle-Forbes
{"title":"Treatment-related beliefs and reactions among trauma-focused therapy completers and discontinuers: A qualitative examination.","authors":"Elizabeth Alpert, Alexandra Gowdy-Jaehnig, Tara E Galovski, Laura A Meis, Melissa A Polusny, Princess E Ackland, Michele Spoont, Helen Valenstein-Mah, Robert J Orazem, Paula P Schnurr, Kathleen M Chard, Shannon M Kehle-Forbes","doi":"10.1037/ser0000831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prolonged exposure (PE) and cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are effective, but some patients do not respond adequately, and dropout rates are high. Patients' beliefs about treatment and perceptions of treatment components influence treatment outcomes and may be amenable to change through intervention. The present study sought to identify beliefs and reactions to PE and CPT that differentiated completers who screened negative for a PTSD diagnosis after treatment (PTSD-), completers who screened positive for a PTSD diagnosis after treatment (PTSD+), and discontinuers who attended six or fewer sessions. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes in qualitative data collected via retrospective semistructured interviews with 51 completers (19 PTSD- after treatment, 32 PTSD+ after treatment) and 66 discontinuers of PE/CPT. Participants were demographically diverse veterans across service eras. Treatment-related beliefs and reactions differentiating these groups included perceived helpfulness of treatment, self-efficacy in engaging in treatment, anticipatory anxiety and concerns, interpretations of ongoing symptoms, and perceived consequences of treatment on functioning. Further, some patterns seemed to differ in early treatment sessions compared to during the active components of treatment. Findings point to potentially malleable targets that could be intervened upon to improve trauma-focused treatment outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"859-870"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11215002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prolonged exposure (PE) and cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are effective, but some patients do not respond adequately, and dropout rates are high. Patients' beliefs about treatment and perceptions of treatment components influence treatment outcomes and may be amenable to change through intervention. The present study sought to identify beliefs and reactions to PE and CPT that differentiated completers who screened negative for a PTSD diagnosis after treatment (PTSD-), completers who screened positive for a PTSD diagnosis after treatment (PTSD+), and discontinuers who attended six or fewer sessions. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes in qualitative data collected via retrospective semistructured interviews with 51 completers (19 PTSD- after treatment, 32 PTSD+ after treatment) and 66 discontinuers of PE/CPT. Participants were demographically diverse veterans across service eras. Treatment-related beliefs and reactions differentiating these groups included perceived helpfulness of treatment, self-efficacy in engaging in treatment, anticipatory anxiety and concerns, interpretations of ongoing symptoms, and perceived consequences of treatment on functioning. Further, some patterns seemed to differ in early treatment sessions compared to during the active components of treatment. Findings point to potentially malleable targets that could be intervened upon to improve trauma-focused treatment outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

创伤焦点疗法完成者和终止者与治疗相关的信念和反应:定性研究。
长期暴露疗法(PE)和认知加工疗法(CPT)对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的治疗是有效的,但有些患者的反应并不充分,而且辍学率很高。患者对治疗的信念和对治疗内容的看法会影响治疗效果,并可能通过干预而改变。本研究试图找出对 PE 和 CPT 的信念和反应,以区分治疗后 PTSD 诊断为阴性的完成者(PTSD-)、治疗后 PTSD 诊断为阳性的完成者(PTSD+)和参加六次或六次以下疗程的中断者。通过对 51 名 PE/CPT 治疗完成者(19 名治疗后创伤后应激障碍诊断阳性者,32 名治疗后创伤后应激障碍诊断阳性者)和 66 名终止治疗者进行回顾性半结构访谈,采用主题分析法确定定性数据中的主题。参与者是不同服役年代的退伍军人。这些群体在治疗相关的信念和反应方面存在差异,包括治疗的帮助感、参与治疗的自我效能感、预期焦虑和担忧、对持续症状的解释以及治疗对功能的影响感。此外,与治疗的积极阶段相比,早期治疗阶段的某些模式似乎有所不同。研究结果表明,可以对潜在的可塑目标进行干预,以改善以创伤为重点的治疗效果。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信