Eye Tracking to Assess the Functional Consequences of Vision Impairment: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ward Nieboer, Andrea Ghiani, Ralph de Vries, Eli Brenner, David L Mann
{"title":"Eye Tracking to Assess the Functional Consequences of Vision Impairment: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ward Nieboer, Andrea Ghiani, Ralph de Vries, Eli Brenner, David L Mann","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eye tracking is a promising method for objectively assessing functional visual capabilities, but its suitability remains unclear when assessing the vision of people with vision impairment. In particular, accurate eye tracking typically relies on a stable and reliable image of the pupil and cornea, which may be compromised by abnormalities associated with vision impairment (e.g., nystagmus, aniridia).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to establish the degree to which video-based eye tracking can be used to assess visual function in the presence of vision impairment.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, encompassing literature from inception to July 2022.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions: </strong>Studies included in the review used video-based eye tracking, included individuals with vision impairment, and used screen-based tasks unrelated to practiced skills such as reading or driving.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>The included studies were assessed for quality using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology assessment tool. Data extraction and synthesis were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis revealed that five common tests of visual function were used: (i) fixation stability, (ii) smooth pursuit, (iii) saccades, (iv) free viewing, and (v) visual search. The studies reported considerable success when testing individuals with vision impairment, yielding usable data from 96.5% of participants.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>There was an overrepresentation of conditions affecting the optic nerve or macula and an underrepresentation of conditions affecting the anterior segment or peripheral retina.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications of key findings: </strong>The results offer promise for the use of eye tracking to assess the visual function of a considerable proportion of those with vision impairment. Based on the findings, we outline a framework for how eye tracking can be used to test visual function in the presence of vision impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Eye tracking is a promising method for objectively assessing functional visual capabilities, but its suitability remains unclear when assessing the vision of people with vision impairment. In particular, accurate eye tracking typically relies on a stable and reliable image of the pupil and cornea, which may be compromised by abnormalities associated with vision impairment (e.g., nystagmus, aniridia).

Objectives: This study aimed to establish the degree to which video-based eye tracking can be used to assess visual function in the presence of vision impairment.

Data sources: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, encompassing literature from inception to July 2022.

Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions: Studies included in the review used video-based eye tracking, included individuals with vision impairment, and used screen-based tasks unrelated to practiced skills such as reading or driving.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods: The included studies were assessed for quality using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology assessment tool. Data extraction and synthesis were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results: Our analysis revealed that five common tests of visual function were used: (i) fixation stability, (ii) smooth pursuit, (iii) saccades, (iv) free viewing, and (v) visual search. The studies reported considerable success when testing individuals with vision impairment, yielding usable data from 96.5% of participants.

Limitations: There was an overrepresentation of conditions affecting the optic nerve or macula and an underrepresentation of conditions affecting the anterior segment or peripheral retina.

Conclusions and implications of key findings: The results offer promise for the use of eye tracking to assess the visual function of a considerable proportion of those with vision impairment. Based on the findings, we outline a framework for how eye tracking can be used to test visual function in the presence of vision impairment.

通过眼动追踪评估视力障碍的功能性后果:系统回顾。
背景:眼动仪是一种很有前途的客观评估视觉功能的方法,但在评估视力障碍者的视力时,眼动仪的适用性仍不明确。特别是,准确的眼动跟踪通常依赖于稳定可靠的瞳孔和角膜图像,而与视力障碍相关的异常(如眼球震颤、无视力)可能会影响眼动跟踪的准确性:本研究旨在确定在视力受损的情况下,视频眼动仪可用于评估视觉功能的程度:研究资格标准、参与者和干预措施:综述所纳入的研究使用了基于视频的眼动追踪技术,纳入了视力障碍患者,并使用了与阅读或驾驶等实践技能无关的基于屏幕的任务:采用 "加强流行病学观察性研究报告 "评估工具对纳入的研究进行质量评估。数据提取和综合按照《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南进行:结果:我们的分析表明,使用了五种常见的视觉功能测试:(i)定点稳定性,(ii)平滑追随,(iii)囊状移动,(iv)自由观看和(v)视觉搜索。这些研究报告称,对视力受损者的测试相当成功,96.5%的参与者获得了可用数据:局限性:影响视神经或黄斑的情况过多,而影响前段或周边视网膜的情况过少:研究结果为使用眼动仪评估相当一部分视力受损者的视觉功能带来了希望。根据研究结果,我们概述了如何使用眼动仪测试视力受损者的视觉功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信