Evaluating Social Validity to Inform Intervention Development: Qualitative Analysis of Caregiver Interviews

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Kendra E. Guinness, Ryan S. Atkinson, Edward G. Feil
{"title":"Evaluating Social Validity to Inform Intervention Development: Qualitative Analysis of Caregiver Interviews","authors":"Kendra E. Guinness, Ryan S. Atkinson, Edward G. Feil","doi":"10.1007/s40617-023-00899-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evaluating social validity of interventions is paramount to the applied dimension of applied behavior analysis, but in research contexts, social validity is frequently assessed only after an intervention has concluded. The present study sought to evaluate the social validity of a proposed intervention prior to intervention development through qualitative analysis of interviews with stakeholders. We interviewed ten caregivers of children with autism about their experiences and challenges engaging in play with their children. We also solicited their opinions on the proposed components of the intervention, including (1) video models; (2) smart speaker prompts; and (3) feedback and coaching via video chat. Qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts revealed several domains related to caregivers’ experiences, including challenges with social communication, openness to learning skills, and desires to build connections with one’s child. Opinions about the proposed intervention components were largely positive, citing the convenience of using technology to access the mostly asynchronous intervention. Some participants expressed hesitation or discomfort surrounding feedback and coaching via video chat. Participants made several helpful suggestions regarding the content and features of the intervention. We discuss our findings in the context of an interactive social validation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":47310,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00899-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating social validity of interventions is paramount to the applied dimension of applied behavior analysis, but in research contexts, social validity is frequently assessed only after an intervention has concluded. The present study sought to evaluate the social validity of a proposed intervention prior to intervention development through qualitative analysis of interviews with stakeholders. We interviewed ten caregivers of children with autism about their experiences and challenges engaging in play with their children. We also solicited their opinions on the proposed components of the intervention, including (1) video models; (2) smart speaker prompts; and (3) feedback and coaching via video chat. Qualitative analysis of the interview transcripts revealed several domains related to caregivers’ experiences, including challenges with social communication, openness to learning skills, and desires to build connections with one’s child. Opinions about the proposed intervention components were largely positive, citing the convenience of using technology to access the mostly asynchronous intervention. Some participants expressed hesitation or discomfort surrounding feedback and coaching via video chat. Participants made several helpful suggestions regarding the content and features of the intervention. We discuss our findings in the context of an interactive social validation process.

评估社会有效性,为干预措施的开发提供依据:护理人员访谈的定性分析
评估干预措施的社会有效性对于应用行为分析的应用层面至关重要,但在研究背景下,社会有效性往往在干预措施结束后才进行评估。本研究试图通过对利益相关者的访谈进行定性分析,在干预措施开发之前评估拟议干预措施的社会有效性。我们采访了十位自闭症儿童的照顾者,了解他们与孩子一起游戏的经历和挑战。我们还征求了他们对干预措施建议内容的意见,包括(1)视频模型;(2)智能扬声器提示;以及(3)通过视频聊天进行反馈和指导。对访谈记录的定性分析揭示了与照顾者的经验有关的几个领域,包括社会交流方面的挑战、学习技能的开放性以及与孩子建立联系的愿望。对所建议的干预内容的看法大多是积极的,认为使用技术来进行大部分是异步的干预很方便。一些参与者对通过视频聊天获得反馈和指导表示犹豫或不适应。参与者就干预的内容和特点提出了一些有益的建议。我们将在互动社会验证过程的背景下讨论我们的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Behavior Analysis in Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
自引率
18.20%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Behavior Analysis in Practice, an official journal of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, is a peer-reviewed translational publication designed to provide science-based, best-practice information relevant to service delivery in behavior analysis. The target audience includes front-line service workers and their supervisors, scientist-practitioners, and school personnel. The mission of Behavior Analysis in Practice is to promote empirically validated best practices in an accessible format that describes not only what works, but also the challenges of implementation in practical settings. Types of articles and topics published  include empirical reports describing the application and evaluation of behavior-analytic procedures and programs; discussion papers on professional and practice issues; technical articles on methods, data analysis, or instrumentation in the practice of behavior analysis; tutorials on terms, procedures, and theories relevant to best practices in behavior analysis; and critical reviews of books and products that are aimed at practitioners or consumers of behavior analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信