Emerging Challenges in Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: Insights from Coagulase Typing, Toxin Genes, and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns.

Advances in Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-23 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/7041159
Samira Zamani, Masoud Dadashi, Sara Bahonar, Mehrdad Haghighi, Sareh Kakavandi, Ali Hashemi, Mohammad Javad Nasiri, Bahareh Hajikhani, Mehdi Goudarzi
{"title":"Emerging Challenges in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bloodstream Infections: Insights from Coagulase Typing, Toxin Genes, and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns.","authors":"Samira Zamani, Masoud Dadashi, Sara Bahonar, Mehrdad Haghighi, Sareh Kakavandi, Ali Hashemi, Mohammad Javad Nasiri, Bahareh Hajikhani, Mehdi Goudarzi","doi":"10.1155/2023/7041159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of complications and mortality associated with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>S. aureus</i>) bloodstream infections has been increasing significantly, particularly in developing countries where control strategies against this virulent pathogen and its resistance to antibacterial agents are insufficient. The aim of this study was to investigate coagulase typing, the prevalence of toxin genes, and the antibiotic resistance profile of <i>S. aureus</i> isolated from bloodstream infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates was determined by the disk diffusion method. The prevalence of toxin genes was determined using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Genetic variability of isolates was determined using multiplex PCR based on coagulase gene polymorphism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 120 strains, 55 (46%) were methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> (MRSA) and 65 (54%) were methicillin-sensitive <i>S. aureus</i> (MSSA). All isolates were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin but showed varying levels of resistance to other antibiotics. The highest resistance was observed for ampicillin (92.5%), gentamicin (69.2%), and amikacin (68.3%). Multidrug resistance was observed in all isolates. PCR analysis revealed a higher prevalence of toxin genes in MRSA (<i>tst</i>: 38%, <i>pvl</i>: 29.1%, <i>eta</i>: 10%, and <i>etb</i>: 4.1%) than that in MSSA. According to the <i>coa</i> typing, the most prevalent types were <i>coa</i> III (29.2%), <i>coa</i> II (26.7%), and <i>coa</i> VI (10%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of genetic variability and widespread multidrug resistance in our hospitals emphasizes the circulation of various <i>coa</i> types. Therefore, it is crucial to implement antimicrobial stewardship and infection control measures to prevent and control the spread of these strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":53309,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10757661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7041159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of complications and mortality associated with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bloodstream infections has been increasing significantly, particularly in developing countries where control strategies against this virulent pathogen and its resistance to antibacterial agents are insufficient. The aim of this study was to investigate coagulase typing, the prevalence of toxin genes, and the antibiotic resistance profile of S. aureus isolated from bloodstream infections.

Methods: Antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates was determined by the disk diffusion method. The prevalence of toxin genes was determined using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Genetic variability of isolates was determined using multiplex PCR based on coagulase gene polymorphism.

Results: Out of 120 strains, 55 (46%) were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 65 (54%) were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA). All isolates were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin but showed varying levels of resistance to other antibiotics. The highest resistance was observed for ampicillin (92.5%), gentamicin (69.2%), and amikacin (68.3%). Multidrug resistance was observed in all isolates. PCR analysis revealed a higher prevalence of toxin genes in MRSA (tst: 38%, pvl: 29.1%, eta: 10%, and etb: 4.1%) than that in MSSA. According to the coa typing, the most prevalent types were coa III (29.2%), coa II (26.7%), and coa VI (10%).

Conclusion: The presence of genetic variability and widespread multidrug resistance in our hospitals emphasizes the circulation of various coa types. Therefore, it is crucial to implement antimicrobial stewardship and infection control measures to prevent and control the spread of these strains.

金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的新挑战:凝固酶分型、毒素基因和抗生素耐药性模式的启示。
背景:与金黄色葡萄球菌(S. aureus)血流感染相关的并发症发生率和死亡率正在显著上升,尤其是在发展中国家,这些国家对这种毒性病原体的控制策略及其对抗菌药的耐药性不足。本研究旨在调查从血流感染中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌的凝固酶分型、毒素基因的流行率和抗生素耐药性情况:方法:采用磁盘扩散法测定分离菌的抗生素敏感性。聚合酶链反应(PCR)法测定毒素基因的流行率。利用基于凝固酶基因多态性的多重聚合酶链反应确定分离菌株的基因变异性:在 120 株菌株中,55 株(46%)为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA),65 株(54%)为甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)。所有分离菌株均对利奈唑胺和替考拉宁敏感,但对其他抗生素表现出不同程度的耐药性。耐药性最高的是氨苄西林(92.5%)、庆大霉素(69.2%)和阿米卡星(68.3%)。在所有分离株中都发现了多重耐药性。PCR 分析显示,MRSA 中毒素基因的流行率(tst:38%;pvl:29.1%;eta:10%;etb:4.1%)高于 MSSA。根据 coa 分型,最常见的类型是 coa III(29.2%)、coa II(26.7%)和 coa VI(10%):结论:我国医院中存在的基因变异性和广泛的多重耐药性强调了各种coa类型的流行。因此,采取抗菌药物管理和感染控制措施来预防和控制这些菌株的传播至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信