{"title":"Is Electroacupuncture Contraindicated for Preventing and Treating Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy?","authors":"John L McDonald, Matthew Bauer","doi":"10.1089/acu.2023.0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side-effect of several drugs used to combat cancer. Thus, researchers have sought better treatments for and prevention of CIPN, such as electroacupuncture (EA). Some trials show EA worsens or prolongs CIPN pain and recommend against further studies on this. This narrative review explores EA for preventing or treating CIPN, comparing positive and negative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were searched for electroacupuncture, CIPN, and peripheral neuropathy. A snowballing method was used to find systematic reviews and studies in systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven English-language trials were found on using EA for preventing or treating CIPN. In 3 prevention studies, 1 had significant benefits, 1 had modest benefits, and 1 had worse pain in an EA group at follow-up, compared to sham controls. In 4 treatment studies, 2 had significant benefits, 1 had no difference from 3 controls, and 1 had sham control was superior to verum EA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most of the studies were limited by small sample sizes, and some studies used EA protocols and treatment doses (frequency and total number of sessions) that were potentially suboptimal. The quantity and quality of the studies are insufficient to draw firm conclusions on effectiveness and safety. More studies must test optimal EA protocols and treatment dosages. It is inappropriate to say that EA is not recommended for CIPN prevention or treatment, because there is no robust evidence to justify this. Generally, research has found benefits and no harms.</p>","PeriodicalId":45511,"journal":{"name":"Medical Acupuncture","volume":"35 6","pages":"290-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10753944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Acupuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2023.0085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side-effect of several drugs used to combat cancer. Thus, researchers have sought better treatments for and prevention of CIPN, such as electroacupuncture (EA). Some trials show EA worsens or prolongs CIPN pain and recommend against further studies on this. This narrative review explores EA for preventing or treating CIPN, comparing positive and negative outcomes.
Methods: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were searched for electroacupuncture, CIPN, and peripheral neuropathy. A snowballing method was used to find systematic reviews and studies in systematic reviews.
Results: Seven English-language trials were found on using EA for preventing or treating CIPN. In 3 prevention studies, 1 had significant benefits, 1 had modest benefits, and 1 had worse pain in an EA group at follow-up, compared to sham controls. In 4 treatment studies, 2 had significant benefits, 1 had no difference from 3 controls, and 1 had sham control was superior to verum EA.
Conclusions: Most of the studies were limited by small sample sizes, and some studies used EA protocols and treatment doses (frequency and total number of sessions) that were potentially suboptimal. The quantity and quality of the studies are insufficient to draw firm conclusions on effectiveness and safety. More studies must test optimal EA protocols and treatment dosages. It is inappropriate to say that EA is not recommended for CIPN prevention or treatment, because there is no robust evidence to justify this. Generally, research has found benefits and no harms.
背景:化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)是多种抗癌药物的常见副作用。因此,研究人员一直在寻找更好的治疗和预防 CIPN 的方法,如电针(EA)。一些试验表明,EA 会加重或延长 CIPN 疼痛,因此建议不要对此进行进一步研究。本叙述性综述探讨了 EA 在预防或治疗 CIPN 方面的作用,并对正反两方面的结果进行了比较:方法:在 PubMed、ScienceDirect 和 Google Scholar 上搜索电针、CIPN 和周围神经病变。采用滚雪球法查找系统综述和系统综述中的研究:结果:发现了七项使用 EA 预防或治疗 CIPN 的英文试验。在 3 项预防研究中,与假对照组相比,1 项研究有显著疗效,1 项研究有轻微疗效,1 项研究的 EA 组在随访时疼痛加剧。在4项治疗研究中,2项有明显疗效,1项与3项对照组无差异,1项假对照组优于EA真药:大多数研究受限于样本量较小,一些研究使用的 EA 方案和治疗剂量(频率和疗程总数)可能不够理想。这些研究的数量和质量都不足以就有效性和安全性得出明确结论。更多的研究必须测试最佳的 EA 方案和治疗剂量。不建议将 EA 用于 CIPN 预防或治疗的说法是不恰当的,因为没有有力的证据证明这种说法是正确的。一般来说,研究发现EA有益无害。