[Opportunities and risks of advance directives : An appraisal of the practice in Germany after legal regulation in 2009].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Schmerz Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1007/s00482-023-00771-0
Christoph G Dietrich, Konrad Schoppmeyer
{"title":"[Opportunities and risks of advance directives : An appraisal of the practice in Germany after legal regulation in 2009].","authors":"Christoph G Dietrich, Konrad Schoppmeyer","doi":"10.1007/s00482-023-00771-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Living wills/advance directives (AD) are an important tool for specifying patient wishes regarding medical care in the case of future inability to consent. Since 2009, German legislation defines framework conditions for the creation and validity of such directives in § 1901a BGB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive literature search in an international and a German-language database was conducted to identify, analyze, and evaluate scientific articles on opportunities, risks, and problems in the creation and implementation of living wills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 10 and 40% of patients have an AD. Among the stipulations in the AD, the demand for sufficient pain therapy is very important. However, numerous problems in the preparation and implementation of ADs reduce their value in everyday clinical practice. In particular, unclear conditions of validity, unspecific instructions for action, and lack of availability of the directives prevent practitioners from determining the patient's will. Other fundamental problems include frequent patient ambivalence and clinical ethical dissent. In addition, the framework condition of unlimited coverage set by the law carries the risk that changes of opinion in the course of life or disease are not taken into account.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preparing an AD requires a high level of information, consultation, and time, as well as regular review or adjustment of its content. These factors are often not considered, thus complicating implementation and reducing the value of living wills. Possible solutions to these problems or alternative concepts for different patient settings are discussed in this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":21572,"journal":{"name":"Schmerz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schmerz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-023-00771-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Living wills/advance directives (AD) are an important tool for specifying patient wishes regarding medical care in the case of future inability to consent. Since 2009, German legislation defines framework conditions for the creation and validity of such directives in § 1901a BGB.

Methods: An extensive literature search in an international and a German-language database was conducted to identify, analyze, and evaluate scientific articles on opportunities, risks, and problems in the creation and implementation of living wills.

Results: Between 10 and 40% of patients have an AD. Among the stipulations in the AD, the demand for sufficient pain therapy is very important. However, numerous problems in the preparation and implementation of ADs reduce their value in everyday clinical practice. In particular, unclear conditions of validity, unspecific instructions for action, and lack of availability of the directives prevent practitioners from determining the patient's will. Other fundamental problems include frequent patient ambivalence and clinical ethical dissent. In addition, the framework condition of unlimited coverage set by the law carries the risk that changes of opinion in the course of life or disease are not taken into account.

Conclusion: Preparing an AD requires a high level of information, consultation, and time, as well as regular review or adjustment of its content. These factors are often not considered, thus complicating implementation and reducing the value of living wills. Possible solutions to these problems or alternative concepts for different patient settings are discussed in this review.

Abstract Image

[预先指示的机遇与风险:2009 年德国法律规范后的实践评估]。
背景:生前预嘱(Advance Directives,AD)是一种重要的工具,可在患者未来无法表示同意的情况下明确其对医疗护理的意愿。自 2009 年起,德国立法在《德国民法典》第 1901a 条中规定了创建此类指令及其有效性的框架条件:在一个国际数据库和一个德语数据库中进行了广泛的文献检索,以确定、分析和评估有关生前预嘱的创建和实施中的机遇、风险和问题的科学文章:10%至 40% 的患者有生前预嘱。在《生前预嘱》的规定中,充分的疼痛治疗要求非常重要。然而,生前预嘱的准备和实施过程中存在的诸多问题降低了其在日常临床实践中的价值。特别是,有效性条件不明确、行动指示不具体以及无法获得指令等问题阻碍了医生确定患者的意愿。其他基本问题还包括患者经常出现的矛盾心理和临床伦理异议。此外,法律规定的无限制覆盖范围的框架条件也有可能使生命或疾病过程中的意见变化得不到考虑:编写 AD 需要大量的信息、咨询和时间,还需要定期审查或调整其内容。这些因素往往没有得到考虑,从而使生前预嘱的执行变得复杂,降低了生前预嘱的价值。本综述讨论了解决这些问题的可能方案或适用于不同患者环境的替代概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schmerz
Schmerz 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Schmerz is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all scientists, practitioners and psychologists, dealing with the treatment of pain patients or working in pain research. The aim of the journal is to enhance the treatment of pain patients in the long run. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of pain research, pain management and pain symptom management. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信