Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty via a frown incision.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1007/s10384-023-01038-y
Satoru Nakatani, Masahiro Yamaguchi, Satoshi Iwamoto
{"title":"Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty via a frown incision.","authors":"Satoru Nakatani, Masahiro Yamaguchi, Satoshi Iwamoto","doi":"10.1007/s10384-023-01038-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) via a sclerocorneal frown incision.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The outcomes of Descement stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) were retrospectively compared between 36 patients (36 eyes) who underwent surgery via a 3.8-mm frown incision (frown incision group) and 20 patients (20 eyes) who underwent surgery via a 4.6-mm straight incision (straight incision group). In all patients, an NS Endo-Inserter was used as the graft inserter and the incision for a frown incision was via the superior sclerocorneal site and for the straight incision via the temporal cornea. DSAEK was performed by the standard technique, except for the incision. At 1 year after surgery, the two groups were compared with respect to the visual acuity, decrease of corneal endothelial cell density, the severity of corneal astigmatism (diopters), the number of sutures for wound closure, and intraoperative/postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative visual acuity, corneal astigmatism, and intraoperative/postoperative complications one year after surgery. On the other hand, the number of sutures required for wound closure was 1.13 ± 0.42 in the frown incision group, whereas in the straight incision group, it was 3.20 ± 0.40, showing a significant difference (P<0.001). In addition, there was no decreased corneal endothelial cell density associated with the reduction in incision width.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A sclerocorneal frown incision is useful for performing DSAEK with an NS Endo-Inserter as it does not affect endothelial cell loss despite its short incision width.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-023-01038-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) via a sclerocorneal frown incision.

Study design: Retrospective comparative study.

Methods: The outcomes of Descement stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) were retrospectively compared between 36 patients (36 eyes) who underwent surgery via a 3.8-mm frown incision (frown incision group) and 20 patients (20 eyes) who underwent surgery via a 4.6-mm straight incision (straight incision group). In all patients, an NS Endo-Inserter was used as the graft inserter and the incision for a frown incision was via the superior sclerocorneal site and for the straight incision via the temporal cornea. DSAEK was performed by the standard technique, except for the incision. At 1 year after surgery, the two groups were compared with respect to the visual acuity, decrease of corneal endothelial cell density, the severity of corneal astigmatism (diopters), the number of sutures for wound closure, and intraoperative/postoperative complications.

Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative visual acuity, corneal astigmatism, and intraoperative/postoperative complications one year after surgery. On the other hand, the number of sutures required for wound closure was 1.13 ± 0.42 in the frown incision group, whereas in the straight incision group, it was 3.20 ± 0.40, showing a significant difference (P<0.001). In addition, there was no decreased corneal endothelial cell density associated with the reduction in incision width.

Conclusions: A sclerocorneal frown incision is useful for performing DSAEK with an NS Endo-Inserter as it does not affect endothelial cell loss despite its short incision width.

通过皱眉切口进行 Descemet 剥脱自动内皮角膜成形术。
目的:评估通过角膜巩膜皱襞切口进行的Descemet剥脱自动上皮内角膜成形术(DSAEK)的效果:研究设计:回顾性比较研究:回顾性比较了通过 3.8 毫米皱眉切口(皱眉切口组)接受手术的 36 名患者(36 只眼)和通过 4.6 毫米直切口(直切口组)接受手术的 20 名患者(20 只眼)的角膜剥脱内皮角膜成形术(Descement stripping endothelial keratoplasty,DSAEK)疗效。所有患者均使用 NS Endo-Inserter 作为移植物植入器,皱眉切口的切口位于巩膜上部,直切口的切口位于颞角膜。除切口外,DSAEK 均按标准技术进行。术后一年,比较两组患者的视力、角膜内皮细胞密度下降情况、角膜散光严重程度(屈光度)、伤口缝合次数以及术中/术后并发症:结果:两组患者术后一年的视力、角膜散光和术中、术后并发症无明显差异。另一方面,皱眉切口组伤口缝合所需的缝合针数为 1.13 ± 0.42,而直线切口组为 3.20 ± 0.40,两者差异显著(PC 结论:皱眉切口是一种巩膜角膜屈光手术:皱眉切口适用于使用 NS Endo-Inser 进行 DSAEK,因为尽管切口宽度较短,但不会影响内皮细胞的丢失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信