Utility of peak inspiratory flow measurement for dry powder inhaler use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-26 DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000001043
Chee Hong Loh, Jill A Ohar
{"title":"Utility of peak inspiratory flow measurement for dry powder inhaler use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","authors":"Chee Hong Loh, Jill A Ohar","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Every type of dry powder inhaler (DPI) device has its own intrinsic resistance. A patient's inspiratory effort produces a pressure drop that determines the inspiratory flow, depending on the inhaler's specific internal resistance. Optimal peak inspiratory flow (PIF) is needed for effective release of dry powder, disaggregation of drug-carrier agglomerates, and optimal deposition of respirable drug particles, particularly generation of a high fine-particle fraction to reach the small airways of the lungs. However, standardized recommendations for PIF measurements are lacking and instructions appeared vague in many instances.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Suboptimal PIFs are common in outpatient chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and during acute exacerbations of COPD, and are associated with increased healthcare resource utilization. There is significant variation in the results of studies which is in part related to different definitions of optimal flow rates, and considerable variation in how PIF is measured in clinical and real-life studies.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Standardization of technique will facilitate comparisons among studies. Specific recommendations for PIF measurement have been proposed to standardize the process and better ensure accurate and reliable PIF values in clinical trials and clinical practice. Clinicians can then select and personalize the most appropriate inhaler for their patients and help them achieve the optimal PIF needed for effective drug dispersion.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Every type of dry powder inhaler (DPI) device has its own intrinsic resistance. A patient's inspiratory effort produces a pressure drop that determines the inspiratory flow, depending on the inhaler's specific internal resistance. Optimal peak inspiratory flow (PIF) is needed for effective release of dry powder, disaggregation of drug-carrier agglomerates, and optimal deposition of respirable drug particles, particularly generation of a high fine-particle fraction to reach the small airways of the lungs. However, standardized recommendations for PIF measurements are lacking and instructions appeared vague in many instances.

Recent findings: Suboptimal PIFs are common in outpatient chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients and during acute exacerbations of COPD, and are associated with increased healthcare resource utilization. There is significant variation in the results of studies which is in part related to different definitions of optimal flow rates, and considerable variation in how PIF is measured in clinical and real-life studies.

Summary: Standardization of technique will facilitate comparisons among studies. Specific recommendations for PIF measurement have been proposed to standardize the process and better ensure accurate and reliable PIF values in clinical trials and clinical practice. Clinicians can then select and personalize the most appropriate inhaler for their patients and help them achieve the optimal PIF needed for effective drug dispersion.

慢性阻塞性肺病患者使用干粉吸入器时吸气流量峰值测量的实用性。
审查目的:每种干粉吸入器(DPI)装置都有自己的内在阻力。患者吸气时产生的压降决定了吸气流量,具体取决于吸入器的特定内阻。干粉的有效释放、药物载体团块的分解和可吸入药物颗粒的最佳沉积,特别是产生高细粒度颗粒以到达肺部小气道,都需要最佳的吸气峰值流量(PIF)。然而,目前还缺乏关于 PIF 测量的标准化建议,而且在许多情况下,说明也显得含糊不清:最近的研究结果:在门诊慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者和慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期,PIF 不达标的情况很常见,并且与医疗资源利用率增加有关。研究结果存在很大差异,部分原因是对最佳流速的定义不同,临床和实际研究中对 PIF 的测量方法也存在很大差异。为了使测量过程标准化,更好地确保临床试验和临床实践中的 PIF 值准确可靠,我们提出了测量 PIF 的具体建议。这样,临床医生就可以为患者选择最合适的吸入器并进行个性化治疗,帮助他们达到有效药物分散所需的最佳 PIF 值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信