Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Aviator Performance During Simulated Flight.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Kathryn A Feltman, Amanda M Kelley
{"title":"Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Aviator Performance During Simulated Flight.","authors":"Kathryn A Feltman, Amanda M Kelley","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6243.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising method for maintaining cognitive performance. Anticipated changes in rotary-wing aircraft are expected to alter aviator performance.<b>METHODS:</b> A single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study evaluated effects of 2-mA anodal tDCS to the right posterior parietal cortex on aviator performance within a Black Hawk simulator. A mixed design with one between-subjects factor was assessed: stimulation prior to flight (20 constant min) and during flight (two timepoints for 10 min each). The within-subjects factor included active vs. sham stimulation. Randomly assigned to each stimulation group were 22 aviators. Aircraft state metrics derived from the simulator were used to evaluate performance. Subjects completed two flights (active stimulation and sham stimulation) with an in-flight emergency introduced at the end to assess whether the timing of tDCS application (prior or during flight) affected the ability to maintain attention and respond to an unexpected event.<b>RESULTS:</b> Results found active stimulation during flight produced statistically significant improvements in performance during the approach following the in-flight emergency. Subjects maintained a more precise approach path with glideslope values closer to zero (M = 0.05) compared to the prior-to-flight group (M = 0.15). The same was found for localizer values (during flight, M = 0.07; prior to flight, M = 0.17). There were no statistically significant differences between groups on secondary outcome measures.<b>DISCUSSION:</b> These findings suggest stimulation during flight may assist in maintaining cognitive resources necessary to respond to an unexpected in-flight emergency. Moreover, blinding efficacy was supported with 32% of subjects correctly guessing when active stimulation was being delivered (52% correctly guessed the sham condition).<b>Feltman KA, Kelley AM. <i>Transcranial direct current stimulation and aviator performance during simulated flight</i>. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(1):5-15.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"95 1","pages":"5-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6243.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising method for maintaining cognitive performance. Anticipated changes in rotary-wing aircraft are expected to alter aviator performance.METHODS: A single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study evaluated effects of 2-mA anodal tDCS to the right posterior parietal cortex on aviator performance within a Black Hawk simulator. A mixed design with one between-subjects factor was assessed: stimulation prior to flight (20 constant min) and during flight (two timepoints for 10 min each). The within-subjects factor included active vs. sham stimulation. Randomly assigned to each stimulation group were 22 aviators. Aircraft state metrics derived from the simulator were used to evaluate performance. Subjects completed two flights (active stimulation and sham stimulation) with an in-flight emergency introduced at the end to assess whether the timing of tDCS application (prior or during flight) affected the ability to maintain attention and respond to an unexpected event.RESULTS: Results found active stimulation during flight produced statistically significant improvements in performance during the approach following the in-flight emergency. Subjects maintained a more precise approach path with glideslope values closer to zero (M = 0.05) compared to the prior-to-flight group (M = 0.15). The same was found for localizer values (during flight, M = 0.07; prior to flight, M = 0.17). There were no statistically significant differences between groups on secondary outcome measures.DISCUSSION: These findings suggest stimulation during flight may assist in maintaining cognitive resources necessary to respond to an unexpected in-flight emergency. Moreover, blinding efficacy was supported with 32% of subjects correctly guessing when active stimulation was being delivered (52% correctly guessed the sham condition).Feltman KA, Kelley AM. Transcranial direct current stimulation and aviator performance during simulated flight. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(1):5-15.

经颅直流电刺激与飞行员在模拟飞行中的表现
简介:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种很有前途的保持认知能力的方法。方法:一项单盲、随机、假对照研究评估了在黑鹰模拟器中对右后顶叶皮层进行 2 毫安阳极 tDCS 刺激对飞行员表现的影响。研究采用混合设计,评估了一个受试者间因素:飞行前刺激(20 分钟)和飞行中刺激(两个时间点,每个时间点 10 分钟)。受试者内因素包括主动刺激与假刺激。22 名飞行员被随机分配到每个刺激组。使用模拟器得出的飞机状态指标来评估表现。受试者完成了两次飞行(主动刺激和假刺激),并在最后引入了飞行中紧急情况,以评估应用 tDCS 的时机(飞行前或飞行中)是否会影响保持注意力和应对突发事件的能力。与飞行前组(M = 0.15)相比,受试者保持了更精确的进场路径,滑坡值更接近零(M = 0.05)。定位值也是如此(飞行中,M = 0.07;飞行前,M = 0.17)。讨论:这些研究结果表明,飞行过程中的刺激可能有助于维持必要的认知资源,以应对飞行中的突发紧急情况。此外,32%的受试者正确猜到了主动刺激的时间(52%的受试者正确猜到了假刺激的时间),证明了盲法的有效性。经颅直流电刺激与飞行员在模拟飞行中的表现。Aerosp Med Hum Perform.2024; 95(1):5-15.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信