Assessment and management of individuals consulting for a suicidal crisis: A European Delphi method-based consensus guidelines.

0 PSYCHIATRY
Aiste Lengvenyte, Lucas Giner, Vincent Jardon, Emilie Olié, Victor Perez, Pilar Saiz, Ana Gonzalez Pinto, Philippe Courtet
{"title":"Assessment and management of individuals consulting for a suicidal crisis: A European Delphi method-based consensus guidelines.","authors":"Aiste Lengvenyte, Lucas Giner, Vincent Jardon, Emilie Olié, Victor Perez, Pilar Saiz, Ana Gonzalez Pinto, Philippe Courtet","doi":"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Managing patient with suicidal thoughts and behaviours presents significant challenges due to the scarcity of robust evidence and clear guidance. This study sought to develop a comprehensive set of practical guidelines for the assessment and management of suicidal crises.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Utilizing the Delphi methodology, 80 suicide clinician and research experts agreed on a series of recommendations. The process involved two iterative rounds of surveys to assess agreement with drafted recommendations, inviting panellists to comment and vote, culminating in 43 consensus recommendations approved with at least 67% agreement. These consensus recommendations fall into three main categories: clinical assessment, immediate care, and long-term approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel formulated 43 recommendations spanning suicidal crisis recognition to continuous long-term care. These guidelines underscore systematic proactive suicide risk screening, in-depth medical and toxicological assessment, and suicide risk appraisal considering personal, clinical factors and collateral information from family. The immediate care directives emphasize a secure environment, continuous risk surveillance, collaborative decision-making, including potential hospitalization, sensible pharmacological management, safety planning, and lethal means restriction counselling. Every discharge should be accompanied by prompt follow-up care incorporating proactive case management and multi-modal approach involving crisis lines, brief contact, and psychotherapeutic and pharmacological interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study generated comprehensive guidelines addressing care for individuals in suicidal crises, covering pre- to post-discharge care. These practical recommendations can guide clinicians in managing patients with suicidal thoughts and behaviours, improve patient safety, and ultimately contribute to the prevention of future suicidal crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.12.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Managing patient with suicidal thoughts and behaviours presents significant challenges due to the scarcity of robust evidence and clear guidance. This study sought to develop a comprehensive set of practical guidelines for the assessment and management of suicidal crises.

Materials and methods: Utilizing the Delphi methodology, 80 suicide clinician and research experts agreed on a series of recommendations. The process involved two iterative rounds of surveys to assess agreement with drafted recommendations, inviting panellists to comment and vote, culminating in 43 consensus recommendations approved with at least 67% agreement. These consensus recommendations fall into three main categories: clinical assessment, immediate care, and long-term approaches.

Results: The panel formulated 43 recommendations spanning suicidal crisis recognition to continuous long-term care. These guidelines underscore systematic proactive suicide risk screening, in-depth medical and toxicological assessment, and suicide risk appraisal considering personal, clinical factors and collateral information from family. The immediate care directives emphasize a secure environment, continuous risk surveillance, collaborative decision-making, including potential hospitalization, sensible pharmacological management, safety planning, and lethal means restriction counselling. Every discharge should be accompanied by prompt follow-up care incorporating proactive case management and multi-modal approach involving crisis lines, brief contact, and psychotherapeutic and pharmacological interventions.

Conclusions: This study generated comprehensive guidelines addressing care for individuals in suicidal crises, covering pre- to post-discharge care. These practical recommendations can guide clinicians in managing patients with suicidal thoughts and behaviours, improve patient safety, and ultimately contribute to the prevention of future suicidal crises.

自杀危机咨询者的评估和管理:基于德尔菲法的欧洲共识指南。
简介由于缺乏有力的证据和明确的指导,管理有自杀想法和行为的患者面临着巨大的挑战。本研究旨在为自杀危机的评估和管理制定一套全面的实用指南:利用德尔菲法,80 位自杀临床和研究专家就一系列建议达成了一致。这一过程包括两轮反复进行的调查,以评估是否同意所起草的建议,并邀请专家小组成员发表意见和投票,最终以至少 67% 的同意率批准了 43 项共识建议。这些共识建议分为三大类:临床评估、即时护理和长期方法:专家组制定了 43 项建议,涵盖了从自杀危机识别到持续长期护理的各个阶段。这些指南强调系统性的主动自杀风险筛查、深入的医学和毒理学评估,以及考虑个人、临床因素和来自家庭的附带信息的自杀风险评估。即时护理指令强调安全的环境、持续的风险监控、合作决策(包括可能的住院治疗)、合理的药物管理、安全规划和限制致命手段的咨询。每次出院都应及时进行后续护理,包括积极主动的个案管理和多模式方法,包括危机热线、短暂接触、心理治疗和药物干预:这项研究为自杀危机患者的护理提供了全面的指南,涵盖了出院前到出院后的护理。这些实用的建议可以指导临床医生管理有自杀想法和行为的患者,提高患者的安全性,并最终有助于预防未来的自杀危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信