The development process of a candidate screening test for cladding products

IF 2 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cameron MacLeod, Neal Butterworth, Angus Law
{"title":"The development process of a candidate screening test for cladding products","authors":"Cameron MacLeod,&nbsp;Neal Butterworth,&nbsp;Angus Law","doi":"10.1002/fam.3193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ongoing cladding crisis within the United Kingdom has elevated the need for designers and risk assessors to have the knowledge and tools to evaluate the fire safety of proposed and existing cladding systems. This paper documents efforts to develop a test that could be used to evaluate the fire safety hazards of cladding products that were either proposed for use in design or that were found on existing buildings. Specifically, the products of interest were composite products (i.e., those comprised of multiple layers). The conceptual approach of the European harmonised system was used as a basis for investigating whether a small-scale test could be used to evaluate product fire hazards. A relevant fire scenario was identified, this was linked to candidate large-scale reference tests, and this was linked to performance in a candidate small-scale test. The candidate test showed remarkable agreement with the reference large-scale test, however, many issues were also identified. It was found that, even when specifically intended to accommodate composite products, the small-scale test was unable to always evaluate hazards. Thus the authors were left with the conclusion—regardless of the testing system, there are always products that will not fit the testing system, however hard one tries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12186,"journal":{"name":"Fire and Materials","volume":"48 4","pages":"426-438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fam.3193","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire and Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fam.3193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ongoing cladding crisis within the United Kingdom has elevated the need for designers and risk assessors to have the knowledge and tools to evaluate the fire safety of proposed and existing cladding systems. This paper documents efforts to develop a test that could be used to evaluate the fire safety hazards of cladding products that were either proposed for use in design or that were found on existing buildings. Specifically, the products of interest were composite products (i.e., those comprised of multiple layers). The conceptual approach of the European harmonised system was used as a basis for investigating whether a small-scale test could be used to evaluate product fire hazards. A relevant fire scenario was identified, this was linked to candidate large-scale reference tests, and this was linked to performance in a candidate small-scale test. The candidate test showed remarkable agreement with the reference large-scale test, however, many issues were also identified. It was found that, even when specifically intended to accommodate composite products, the small-scale test was unable to always evaluate hazards. Thus the authors were left with the conclusion—regardless of the testing system, there are always products that will not fit the testing system, however hard one tries.

Abstract Image

覆层产品候选筛选测试的开发过程
英国正在发生的覆层危机使设计人员和风险评估人员更加需要掌握评估拟议和现有覆层系统消防安全的知识和工具。本文记录了为开发一种测试方法所做的努力,该测试方法可用于评估拟在设计中使用或在现有建筑物上发现的覆层产品的消防安全危险。具体来说,所关注的产品是复合产品(即由多层组成的产品)。欧洲统一系统的概念方法被用作研究是否可以使用小规模测试来评估产品火灾危险的基础。确定了一个相关的火灾场景,将其与候选的大规模参考测试联系起来,并将其与候选的小规模测试中的性能联系起来。候选测试与参考大尺度测试显示出明显的一致性,但也发现了许多问题。研究发现,即使是专门针对复合材料产品的小规模测试,也无法始终对危险进行评估。因此,作者得出结论:无论采用哪种测试系统,总有一些产品与测试系统不符,无论人们如何努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fire and Materials
Fire and Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Fire and Materials is an international journal for scientific and technological communications directed at the fire properties of materials and the products into which they are made. This covers all aspects of the polymer field and the end uses where polymers find application; the important developments in the fields of natural products - wood and cellulosics; non-polymeric materials - metals and ceramics; as well as the chemistry and industrial applications of fire retardant chemicals. Contributions will be particularly welcomed on heat release; properties of combustion products - smoke opacity, toxicity and corrosivity; modelling and testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信