Unchaining supply chains: Transformative leaps toward regenerating social–ecological systems

IF 10.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Jury Gualandris, Oana Branzei, Miriam Wilhelm, Sergio Lazzarini, Martina Linnenluecke, Ralph Hamann, Kevin J. Dooley, Michael L. Barnett, Chien-Ming Chen
{"title":"Unchaining supply chains: Transformative leaps toward regenerating social–ecological systems","authors":"Jury Gualandris,&nbsp;Oana Branzei,&nbsp;Miriam Wilhelm,&nbsp;Sergio Lazzarini,&nbsp;Martina Linnenluecke,&nbsp;Ralph Hamann,&nbsp;Kevin J. Dooley,&nbsp;Michael L. Barnett,&nbsp;Chien-Ming Chen","doi":"10.1111/jscm.12314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The worsening climate, biodiversity, and inequity crises have existential implications. To help resolve these crises, supply chains must move beyond a <i>minimal harm</i> approach. Instead, supply chains must make positive contributions to and harmoniously integrate with the living systems around them. Despite agreement on this urgent need, supply chain management research still lacks a shared roadmap for establishing economically sustainable supply chains that actively <i>regenerate</i> social–ecological systems. This essay deepens the understanding of regenerative supply chains, inviting supply chain scholars and practitioners to rally around timely questions and codevelop new answers. We first scrutinize the paradigmatic assumptions that continue to anchor contemporary research and practice in supply chain management, showing how these once helpful assumptions now hold the community back from seeking much needed solutions. We then offer real-world examples and synthesize emerging arguments from multiple disciplines to propose three new principles of regenerative organizing: <i>proportionality</i>, <i>reciprocity</i>, and <i>poly-rhythmicity</i>. We also delve into the implications of pursuing these regenerative principles for supply chain coordination, governance, and resilience. Finally, we reflect on the fit of empirical research designs and methods for examining the <i>creation</i> of new regenerative supply chains and the <i>conversion</i> of existing supply chains.</p>","PeriodicalId":51392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Supply Chain Management","volume":"60 1","pages":"53-67"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jscm.12314","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Supply Chain Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jscm.12314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The worsening climate, biodiversity, and inequity crises have existential implications. To help resolve these crises, supply chains must move beyond a minimal harm approach. Instead, supply chains must make positive contributions to and harmoniously integrate with the living systems around them. Despite agreement on this urgent need, supply chain management research still lacks a shared roadmap for establishing economically sustainable supply chains that actively regenerate social–ecological systems. This essay deepens the understanding of regenerative supply chains, inviting supply chain scholars and practitioners to rally around timely questions and codevelop new answers. We first scrutinize the paradigmatic assumptions that continue to anchor contemporary research and practice in supply chain management, showing how these once helpful assumptions now hold the community back from seeking much needed solutions. We then offer real-world examples and synthesize emerging arguments from multiple disciplines to propose three new principles of regenerative organizing: proportionality, reciprocity, and poly-rhythmicity. We also delve into the implications of pursuing these regenerative principles for supply chain coordination, governance, and resilience. Finally, we reflect on the fit of empirical research designs and methods for examining the creation of new regenerative supply chains and the conversion of existing supply chains.

解开供应链的枷锁:实现社会生态系统再生的变革性飞跃
日益恶化的气候、生物多样性和不公平危机对人类生存产生了影响。为了帮助解决这些危机,供应链必须超越最小伤害的方法。相反,供应链必须为周围的生命系统做出积极贡献,并与之和谐共处。尽管对这一迫切需求已达成共识,但供应链管理研究仍缺乏一个共同的路线图,来建立积极促进社会生态系统再生的经济可持续供应链。这篇文章加深了人们对再生供应链的理解,邀请供应链学者和从业人员围绕及时提出的问题展开讨论,并制定新的答案。我们首先审视了继续支撑当代供应链管理研究和实践的范式假设,说明这些曾经有用的假设现在是如何阻碍社会寻求急需的解决方案的。然后,我们提供了现实世界中的实例,并综合了多个学科的新论点,提出了再生组织的三个新原则:比例性、互惠性和多节奏性。我们还深入探讨了奉行这些再生原则对供应链协调、治理和复原力的影响。最后,我们思考了实证研究的设计和方法是否适用于研究新再生供应链的创建和现有供应链的转换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.60%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: ournal of Supply Chain Management Mission: The mission of the Journal of Supply Chain Management (JSCM) is to be the premier choice among supply chain management scholars from various disciplines. It aims to attract high-quality, impactful behavioral research that focuses on theory building and employs rigorous empirical methodologies. Article Requirements: An article published in JSCM must make a significant contribution to supply chain management theory. This contribution can be achieved through either an inductive, theory-building process or a deductive, theory-testing approach. This contribution may manifest in various ways, such as falsification of conventional understanding, theory-building through conceptual development, inductive or qualitative research, initial empirical testing of a theory, theoretically-based meta-analysis, or constructive replication that clarifies the boundaries or range of a theory. Theoretical Contribution: Manuscripts should explicitly convey the theoretical contribution relative to the existing supply chain management literature, and when appropriate, to the literature outside of supply chain management (e.g., management theory, psychology, economics). Empirical Contribution: Manuscripts published in JSCM must also provide strong empirical contributions. While conceptual manuscripts are welcomed, they must significantly advance theory in the field of supply chain management and be firmly grounded in existing theory and relevant literature. For empirical manuscripts, authors must adequately assess validity, which is essential for empirical research, whether quantitative or qualitative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信