DRR Interview with Terry Cannon: disaster studies: why is class being ignored?

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Terry Cannon
{"title":"DRR Interview with Terry Cannon: disaster studies: why is class being ignored?","authors":"Terry Cannon","doi":"10.1108/dpm-10-2023-0254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The transcript is of one from a number of interviews with disaster risk reduction (DRR) “pioneers” carried out in 2022 as a part of the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) project to record the history of the field. It aims to enable one of the “pioneers” to explain his role in the emergence of disaster studies and provide critical commentary on what he considers is wrong with current DRR approaches.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Terry Cannon was interviewed to explain the beginnings of his involvement in disasters research and to comment on his views on progress in the field of disaster risk reduction since his early work in the 1980s. The transcript and video were developed in the context of the UNDRR project on the history of DRR.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The interview provides an account of the origins of the book “At Risk” and why it was considered necessary. This is put into the context of how the field of DRR has emerged since the 1980s. It elicits opinions on what he considers the gaps in both his early work (especially in the book “At Risk” of which he was a co-author) and in the field of DRR recently.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>It provides historical context on how early disaster research developed the alternative framework of “social construction” of disasters, in opposition to the idea that they are “natural”. It challenges some of the approaches that have emerged as DRR and has been institutionalised, including its increasing difficulty in supporting the ideas of social construction.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Prevention and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-10-2023-0254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The transcript is of one from a number of interviews with disaster risk reduction (DRR) “pioneers” carried out in 2022 as a part of the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) project to record the history of the field. It aims to enable one of the “pioneers” to explain his role in the emergence of disaster studies and provide critical commentary on what he considers is wrong with current DRR approaches.

Design/methodology/approach

Terry Cannon was interviewed to explain the beginnings of his involvement in disasters research and to comment on his views on progress in the field of disaster risk reduction since his early work in the 1980s. The transcript and video were developed in the context of the UNDRR project on the history of DRR.

Findings

The interview provides an account of the origins of the book “At Risk” and why it was considered necessary. This is put into the context of how the field of DRR has emerged since the 1980s. It elicits opinions on what he considers the gaps in both his early work (especially in the book “At Risk” of which he was a co-author) and in the field of DRR recently.

Originality/value

It provides historical context on how early disaster research developed the alternative framework of “social construction” of disasters, in opposition to the idea that they are “natural”. It challenges some of the approaches that have emerged as DRR and has been institutionalised, including its increasing difficulty in supporting the ideas of social construction.

DRR 专访 Terry Cannon:灾害研究:为什么课堂被忽视?
目的作为联合国减少灾害风险办公室(UNDRR)记录该领域历史项目的一部分,2022 年对减少灾害风险(DRR)"先驱 "进行了多次采访,本记录是其中的一次。采访的目的是让其中一位 "先驱 "解释他在灾害研究兴起过程中所扮演的角色,并对他认为当前的减灾方法存在的问题进行批判性评论。设计/方法/途径对特里-坎农(Terry Cannon)进行了采访,让他解释自己参与灾害研究的初衷,并对他自 20 世纪 80 年代早期工作以来在减灾领域取得的进展发表看法。访谈记录和视频是在联合国减少灾害风险十年关于减少灾害风险历史的项目背景下制作的。这是在 1980 年代以来如何出现减少灾害风险领域的背景下进行的。原创性/价值 它提供了早期灾害研究如何发展灾害的 "社会建构 "替代框架的历史背景,与灾害是 "自然 "的观点相对立。它对随着减少灾害风险的出现和制度化而出现的一些方法提出了质疑,包括在支持社会建构的观点方面遇到的越来越多的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Disaster Prevention and Management, An International Journal, sets out to advance the available knowledge in the fields of disaster prevention and management and to act as an integrative agent for extant methodologies and activities relating to disaster emergency and crisis management. Publishing high quality, refereed papers, the journal supports the exchange of ideas, experience and practice between academics, practitioners and policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信