Multiparametric Analysis Combining DSC-MR Perfusion and [18F]FET-PET is Superior to a Single Parameter Approach for Differentiation of Progressive Glioma from Radiation Necrosis

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Jürgen Panholzer, Gertraud Walli, Bettina Grün, Ognian Kalev, Michael Sonnberger, Robert Pichler
{"title":"Multiparametric Analysis Combining DSC-MR Perfusion and [18F]FET-PET is Superior to a Single Parameter Approach for Differentiation of Progressive Glioma from Radiation Necrosis","authors":"Jürgen Panholzer, Gertraud Walli, Bettina Grün, Ognian Kalev, Michael Sonnberger, Robert Pichler","doi":"10.1007/s00062-023-01372-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Perfusion-weighted (PWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and O‑(2-[18F]fluoroethyl-)-l-tyrosine ([18F]FET) positron emission tomography (PET) are both useful for discrimination of progressive disease (PD) from radiation necrosis (RN) in patients with gliomas. Previous literature showed that the combined use of FET-PET and MRI-PWI is advantageous; hhowever the increased diagnostic performances were only modest compared to the use of a single modality. Hence, the goal of this study was to further explore the benefit of combining MRI-PWI and [18F]FET-PET for differentiation of PD from RN. Secondarily, we evaluated the usefulness of cerebral blood flow (CBF), mean transit time (MTT) and time to peak (TTP) as previous studies mainly examined cerebral blood volume (CBV).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In this single center study, we retrospectively identified patients with WHO grades II–IV gliomas with suspected tumor recurrence, presenting with ambiguous findings on structural MRI. For differentiation of PD from RN we used both MRI-PWI and [18F]FET-PET. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI-PWI provided normalized parameters derived from perfusion maps (r(relative)CBV, rCBF, rMTT, rTTP). Static [18F]FET-PET parameters including mean and maximum tumor to brain ratios (TBR<sub>mean</sub>, TBR<sub>max</sub>) were calculated. Based on histopathology and radioclinical follow-up we diagnosed PD in 27 and RN in 10 cases. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated for single and multiparametric models. The performances of single and multiparametric approaches were assessed with analysis of variance and cross-validation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 37 patients in this study. Regarding the in-sample based approach, in single parameter analysis rTBR<sub>mean</sub> (AUC = 0.91, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), rTBR<sub>max</sub> (AUC = 0.89, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), rTTP (AUC = 0.87, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and rCBV<sub>mean</sub> (AUC = 0.84, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were efficacious for discrimination of PD from RN. The rCBF<sub>mean</sub> and rMTT did not reach statistical significance. A classification model consisting of TBR<sub>mean</sub>, rCBV<sub>mean</sub> and rTTP achieved an AUC of 0.98 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), outperforming the use of rTBR<sub>mean</sub> alone, which was the single parametric approach with the highest AUC. Analysis of variance confirmed the superiority of the multiparametric approach over the single parameter one (<i>p</i> = 0.002). While cross-validation attributed the highest AUC value to the model consisting of TBR<sub>mean</sub> and rCBV<sub>mean</sub>, it also suggested that the addition of rTTP resulted in the highest accuracy. Overall, multiparametric models performed better than single parameter ones.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>A multiparametric MRI-PWI and [18F]FET-PET model consisting of TBR<sub>mean</sub>, rCBV<sub>mean</sub> and PWI rTTP significantly outperformed the use of rTBR<sub>mean</sub> alone, which was the best single parameter approach. Secondarily, we firstly report the potential usefulness of PWI rTTP for discrimination of PD from RN in patients with glioma; however, for validation of our findings the prospective studies with larger patient samples are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01372-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Perfusion-weighted (PWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and O‑(2-[18F]fluoroethyl-)-l-tyrosine ([18F]FET) positron emission tomography (PET) are both useful for discrimination of progressive disease (PD) from radiation necrosis (RN) in patients with gliomas. Previous literature showed that the combined use of FET-PET and MRI-PWI is advantageous; hhowever the increased diagnostic performances were only modest compared to the use of a single modality. Hence, the goal of this study was to further explore the benefit of combining MRI-PWI and [18F]FET-PET for differentiation of PD from RN. Secondarily, we evaluated the usefulness of cerebral blood flow (CBF), mean transit time (MTT) and time to peak (TTP) as previous studies mainly examined cerebral blood volume (CBV).

Methods

In this single center study, we retrospectively identified patients with WHO grades II–IV gliomas with suspected tumor recurrence, presenting with ambiguous findings on structural MRI. For differentiation of PD from RN we used both MRI-PWI and [18F]FET-PET. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI-PWI provided normalized parameters derived from perfusion maps (r(relative)CBV, rCBF, rMTT, rTTP). Static [18F]FET-PET parameters including mean and maximum tumor to brain ratios (TBRmean, TBRmax) were calculated. Based on histopathology and radioclinical follow-up we diagnosed PD in 27 and RN in 10 cases. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated for single and multiparametric models. The performances of single and multiparametric approaches were assessed with analysis of variance and cross-validation.

Results

After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 37 patients in this study. Regarding the in-sample based approach, in single parameter analysis rTBRmean (AUC = 0.91, p < 0.001), rTBRmax (AUC = 0.89, p < 0.001), rTTP (AUC = 0.87, p < 0.001) and rCBVmean (AUC = 0.84, p < 0.001) were efficacious for discrimination of PD from RN. The rCBFmean and rMTT did not reach statistical significance. A classification model consisting of TBRmean, rCBVmean and rTTP achieved an AUC of 0.98 (p < 0.001), outperforming the use of rTBRmean alone, which was the single parametric approach with the highest AUC. Analysis of variance confirmed the superiority of the multiparametric approach over the single parameter one (p = 0.002). While cross-validation attributed the highest AUC value to the model consisting of TBRmean and rCBVmean, it also suggested that the addition of rTTP resulted in the highest accuracy. Overall, multiparametric models performed better than single parameter ones.

Conclusion

A multiparametric MRI-PWI and [18F]FET-PET model consisting of TBRmean, rCBVmean and PWI rTTP significantly outperformed the use of rTBRmean alone, which was the best single parameter approach. Secondarily, we firstly report the potential usefulness of PWI rTTP for discrimination of PD from RN in patients with glioma; however, for validation of our findings the prospective studies with larger patient samples are necessary.

Abstract Image

结合DSC-MR灌注和[18F]FET-PET的多参数分析在区分进展期胶质瘤和放射性坏死方面优于单一参数方法
目的灌注加权(PWI)磁共振成像(MRI)和O-(2-[18F]氟乙基-)-l-酪氨酸([18F]FET)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)都有助于鉴别胶质瘤患者的进展性疾病(PD)和放射性坏死(RN)。以前的文献显示,联合使用 FET-PET 和 MRI-PWI 有一定优势;但与使用单一模式相比,诊断效果的提高并不明显。因此,本研究的目的是进一步探讨 MRI-PWI 和[18F]FET-PET 联合使用对区分 PD 和 RN 的益处。其次,我们评估了脑血流量(CBF)、平均通过时间(MTT)和达峰时间(TTP)的有用性,因为之前的研究主要检查的是脑血容量(CBV)。方法在这项单中心研究中,我们回顾性地发现了疑似肿瘤复发的WHO II-IV级胶质瘤患者,他们在结构性MRI上出现了模糊的结果。为了区分PD和RN,我们使用了MRI-PWI和[18F]FET-PET。动态易感对比 MRI-PWI 可提供由灌注图(r(relative)CBV、rCBF、rMTT、rTTP)得出的归一化参数。静态[18F]FET-PET参数包括肿瘤与脑的平均比率和最大比率(TBRmean、TBRmax)。根据组织病理学和放射临床随访结果,我们诊断出 27 例为 PD,10 例为 RN。通过接收者操作特征(ROC)分析,计算了单一和多参数模型的曲线下面积(AUC)值。通过方差分析和交叉验证评估了单参数和多参数方法的性能。关于基于样本的方法,在单参数分析中,rTBRmean(AUC = 0.91,p < 0.001)、rTBRmax(AUC = 0.89,p < 0.001)、rTTP(AUC = 0.87,p < 0.001)和 rCBVmean(AUC = 0.84,p < 0.001)对区分 PD 和 RN 有效。而 rCBFmean 和 rMTT 则没有统计学意义。由 TBRmean、rCBVmean 和 rTTP 组成的分类模型的 AUC 为 0.98(p < 0.001),优于单独使用 rTBRmean,后者是 AUC 最高的单一参数方法。方差分析证实了多参数方法优于单参数方法(p = 0.002)。虽然交叉验证认为由 TBRmean 和 rCBVmean 组成的模型的 AUC 值最高,但交叉验证也表明,加入 rTTP 后的准确率最高。结论 由 TBRmean、rCBVmean 和 PWI rTTP 组成的多参数 MRI-PWI 和[18F]FET-PET 模型明显优于单独使用 rTBRmean,后者是最佳的单参数方法。其次,我们首次报告了脉搏波速度 rTTP 在胶质瘤患者中区分 PD 和 RN 的潜在作用;但是,为了验证我们的研究结果,有必要进行更大规模患者样本的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信