{"title":"“By the way I want to give you some masks”: exploring multimodal stance-taking in YouTube videos","authors":"Wing Yee Jenifer Ho","doi":"10.1515/applirev-2023-0262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the effectiveness of facemasks against COVID-19 has now become largely uncontroversial, at the beginning of the global pandemic, wearers of facemasks were often the target of sometimes racially tinged attacks. Wearing facemasks (or not) became not just a question of science, but evolved into a more complex issue of social identity, morality and global citizenship embedded within the “tribal thinking” of mask-wearers and non-mask-wearers. This paper explores to what extent two bilingual YouTube influencers participated in either accentuating or softening of boundaries of the two “tribes” by embedding facemasks in their videos. Based on multimodal transcriptions of the two videos (Wang, Yilei, Dezheng Feng & Wing Y. J. Ho. 2021. Identity, lifestyle, and face-mask branding: A social semiotic multimodal discourse analysis. <jats:italic>Multimodality & Society</jats:italic> 1(2). 216–237), three moments were identified where facemasks were employed by the social actors to perform everyday activities, such as grocery shopping and family brunch. I then examine the interactional stances (Dubois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), <jats:italic>Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction</jats:italic>, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins) taken by the actors towards facemasks through language and other semiotic resources. By exploring their multimodal stance-taking, it is argued that the two YouTubers’ intercultural trajectories, their performances of authenticity, and their established influence on social media provided them unique means for participating in tribalizing discourses around facemasks by making perceived differences between different groups materials for cultural consumption. The paper concludes by discussing the opportunities and challenges of vernacular health communication through social media influencers.","PeriodicalId":46472,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2023-0262","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While the effectiveness of facemasks against COVID-19 has now become largely uncontroversial, at the beginning of the global pandemic, wearers of facemasks were often the target of sometimes racially tinged attacks. Wearing facemasks (or not) became not just a question of science, but evolved into a more complex issue of social identity, morality and global citizenship embedded within the “tribal thinking” of mask-wearers and non-mask-wearers. This paper explores to what extent two bilingual YouTube influencers participated in either accentuating or softening of boundaries of the two “tribes” by embedding facemasks in their videos. Based on multimodal transcriptions of the two videos (Wang, Yilei, Dezheng Feng & Wing Y. J. Ho. 2021. Identity, lifestyle, and face-mask branding: A social semiotic multimodal discourse analysis. Multimodality & Society 1(2). 216–237), three moments were identified where facemasks were employed by the social actors to perform everyday activities, such as grocery shopping and family brunch. I then examine the interactional stances (Dubois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins) taken by the actors towards facemasks through language and other semiotic resources. By exploring their multimodal stance-taking, it is argued that the two YouTubers’ intercultural trajectories, their performances of authenticity, and their established influence on social media provided them unique means for participating in tribalizing discourses around facemasks by making perceived differences between different groups materials for cultural consumption. The paper concludes by discussing the opportunities and challenges of vernacular health communication through social media influencers.
虽然口罩抵御 COVID-19 的效果现在已基本没有争议,但在全球大流行之初,佩戴口罩者往往成为有时带有种族色彩的攻击目标。戴口罩(或不戴口罩)已不仅仅是一个科学问题,而是演变成了一个更为复杂的社会身份、道德和全球公民意识问题,蕴含在戴口罩者和不戴口罩者的 "部落思维 "之中。本文探讨了 YouTube 上的两位双语影响者通过在其视频中嵌入面具,在多大程度上参与强调或弱化了两个 "部落 "的界限。基于对两段视频的多模态转录(王轶磊、冯德政 & Wing Y. J. Ho.J. Ho.2021.身份、生活方式与口罩品牌:社会符号学多模态话语分析。Multimodality & Society 1(2).216-237),确定了社会行动者使用口罩进行日常活动(如买菜和家庭早午餐)的三个时刻。然后,我研究了互动立场(Dubois, John W. 2007.立场三角。见 Robert Englebretson(编),《话语中的立场》:主观性、评价、互动》,139-182 页。阿姆斯特丹:约翰-本杰明(John Benjamins)通过语言和其他符号资源对面罩采取的立场。通过探究他们的多模态立场,本文认为,这两位 YouTubers 的跨文化轨迹、他们的真实性表演以及他们在社交媒体上的既定影响力,为他们提供了独特的手段,使他们能够通过将不同群体之间的感知差异作为文化消费的素材,从而参与到围绕面具的部落化话语中。本文最后讨论了通过社交媒体影响者进行方言健康传播的机遇和挑战。