Daily and Trait personality Assessments’ relationship with Daily experiences of stress risk and resilience factors

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Giselle Ferguson , Sumbleen Ali , Giancarlo Pasquini , Eileen Graham , Daniel Mrozcek , Sean Clouston , Nicholas Eaton , Andreas B. Neubauer , Stacey Scott
{"title":"Daily and Trait personality Assessments’ relationship with Daily experiences of stress risk and resilience factors","authors":"Giselle Ferguson ,&nbsp;Sumbleen Ali ,&nbsp;Giancarlo Pasquini ,&nbsp;Eileen Graham ,&nbsp;Daniel Mrozcek ,&nbsp;Sean Clouston ,&nbsp;Nicholas Eaton ,&nbsp;Andreas B. Neubauer ,&nbsp;Stacey Scott","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Personality predicts individual differences in stress risk and resilience factors, but these associations are often examined via global trait measures, which may not capture how associations unfold in daily life, especially for older adults whose global ratings may not be weighted towards their current experiences. The current study used intensive measurements in a sample of older adults to investigate how daily and trait measures of extraversion and neuroticism<span> related to daily occurrences of a stress risk (stressors) and resilience (social interactions. Participants (N = 201; ages 70–93) completed a trait personality<span> measure and then a 16-day ecological momentary assessment period during which they reported on the occurrence of stressors and social interactions and completed daily assessments of extraversion and neuroticism. Multilevel model results showed that Social Interactions were predicted positively by Daily Extraversion at the within- and between-person levels, and negatively by Daily Neuroticism at the within-person level, but that global measures of these traits did not show significant relationships. Conversely, Stressors were predicted negatively at the within-person level by Daily Extraversion and positively at the within-person level by Daily Neuroticism. Although Trait Extraversion did not significantly relate to Stressors, Trait Neuroticism showed a significant positive relationship with Stressors at the between-person level. Results illustrate how fluctuation in the manifestation of personality as measured with daily assessments relates meaningfully to daily experiences of stress risk and resilience factors, and may not always be captured by global measures in older adults.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 104452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656623001149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personality predicts individual differences in stress risk and resilience factors, but these associations are often examined via global trait measures, which may not capture how associations unfold in daily life, especially for older adults whose global ratings may not be weighted towards their current experiences. The current study used intensive measurements in a sample of older adults to investigate how daily and trait measures of extraversion and neuroticism related to daily occurrences of a stress risk (stressors) and resilience (social interactions. Participants (N = 201; ages 70–93) completed a trait personality measure and then a 16-day ecological momentary assessment period during which they reported on the occurrence of stressors and social interactions and completed daily assessments of extraversion and neuroticism. Multilevel model results showed that Social Interactions were predicted positively by Daily Extraversion at the within- and between-person levels, and negatively by Daily Neuroticism at the within-person level, but that global measures of these traits did not show significant relationships. Conversely, Stressors were predicted negatively at the within-person level by Daily Extraversion and positively at the within-person level by Daily Neuroticism. Although Trait Extraversion did not significantly relate to Stressors, Trait Neuroticism showed a significant positive relationship with Stressors at the between-person level. Results illustrate how fluctuation in the manifestation of personality as measured with daily assessments relates meaningfully to daily experiences of stress risk and resilience factors, and may not always be captured by global measures in older adults.

日常和特质人格评估与日常压力体验的关系 风险和复原力因素
人格可以预测压力风险和抗压能力因素的个体差异,但这些关联通常是通过整体特质测量来研究的,这可能无法捕捉到日常生活中的关联是如何展开的,尤其是对于老年人来说,他们的整体评价可能并不是以他们当前的经历为权重的。本研究对老年人样本进行了深入测量,以研究外向性和神经质的日常和特质测量与压力风险(压力源)和抗压能力(社会互动)的日常发生之间的关系。参与者(N=201;年龄 70-93 岁)完成了特质人格测量,然后进行了为期 16 天的生态瞬间评估,在此期间,他们报告了压力源和社会交往的发生情况,并完成了对外向性和神经质的日常评估。多层次模型结果显示,在人内和人际层面上,社会交往受每日外向性的正向预测,在人内层面上,每日神经质受每日外向性的负向预测,但这些特质的总体测量结果并没有显示出显著的关系。相反,每日外向性在人内水平上对压力源的预测为负,而每日神经质在人内水平上对压力源的预测为正。虽然特质外向性与压力源的关系并不显著,但特质神经质与压力源在人与人之间却有显著的正相关关系。研究结果表明,通过日常评估所测得的人格表现的波动与压力风险和复原力因素的日常体验之间存在着有意义的关系,而这种关系可能并不总能被老年人的整体测量所捕捉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信