Towards decolonising higher education: a case study from a UK university

IF 3.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nancy Tamimi, Hala Khalawi, Mariama A. Jallow, Omar Gabriel Torres Valencia, Emediong Jumbo
{"title":"Towards decolonising higher education: a case study from a UK university","authors":"Nancy Tamimi, Hala Khalawi, Mariama A. Jallow, Omar Gabriel Torres Valencia, Emediong Jumbo","doi":"10.1007/s10734-023-01144-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article presents initiatives undertaken by the Department of Global Health and Social Medicine (GHSM) at King’s College London (KCL), exploring avenues to decolonise higher education institutions (HEI). HEI must integrate anti-racism agendas, challenge the European-centric academic knowledge domination, and dismantle power asymmetries. During the academic year 2021, GHSM executed (1) a gap analysis of undergraduate modules, (2) a course on decolonising research methods taught by global scholars to 40 Global South and North university students who completed pre- and post-course surveys, and (3) semi-structured interviews with 11 academics, and a focus group with four students exploring decolonising HEI; findings were thematically analysed. (1) Gap analysis revealed a tokenistic use of Black and minority ethnic and women authors across modules’ readings. (2) The post-course survey showed that 68% strongly agreed the course enhanced their decolonisation knowledge. (3) The thematic analysis identified themes: (1) Decolonisation is about challenging colonial legacies, racism, and knowledge production norms. (2) Decolonisation is about care, inclusivity, and compensation. (3) A decolonised curriculum should embed an anti-racism agenda, reflexive pedagogies, and life experiences involving students and communities. (4) HEI are colonial, exclusionary constructs that should shift to transformative and collaborative ways of thinking and knowing. (5) To decolonise research, we must rethink the hierarchy of knowledge production and dissemination and the politics of North-South research collaborations. Decolonising HEI must be placed within a human rights framework. HEI should integrate anti-racism agendas, give prominence to indigenous and marginalised histories and ways of knowing, and create a non-hierarchical educational environment, with students leading the decolonisation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":48383,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01144-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents initiatives undertaken by the Department of Global Health and Social Medicine (GHSM) at King’s College London (KCL), exploring avenues to decolonise higher education institutions (HEI). HEI must integrate anti-racism agendas, challenge the European-centric academic knowledge domination, and dismantle power asymmetries. During the academic year 2021, GHSM executed (1) a gap analysis of undergraduate modules, (2) a course on decolonising research methods taught by global scholars to 40 Global South and North university students who completed pre- and post-course surveys, and (3) semi-structured interviews with 11 academics, and a focus group with four students exploring decolonising HEI; findings were thematically analysed. (1) Gap analysis revealed a tokenistic use of Black and minority ethnic and women authors across modules’ readings. (2) The post-course survey showed that 68% strongly agreed the course enhanced their decolonisation knowledge. (3) The thematic analysis identified themes: (1) Decolonisation is about challenging colonial legacies, racism, and knowledge production norms. (2) Decolonisation is about care, inclusivity, and compensation. (3) A decolonised curriculum should embed an anti-racism agenda, reflexive pedagogies, and life experiences involving students and communities. (4) HEI are colonial, exclusionary constructs that should shift to transformative and collaborative ways of thinking and knowing. (5) To decolonise research, we must rethink the hierarchy of knowledge production and dissemination and the politics of North-South research collaborations. Decolonising HEI must be placed within a human rights framework. HEI should integrate anti-racism agendas, give prominence to indigenous and marginalised histories and ways of knowing, and create a non-hierarchical educational environment, with students leading the decolonisation process.

Abstract Image

实现高等教育非殖民化:英国一所大学的案例研究
本文介绍了伦敦国王学院(KCL)全球健康与社会医学系(GHSM)为探索高等教育机构(HEI)非殖民化的途径而采取的举措。高等教育机构必须纳入反种族主义议程,挑战以欧洲为中心的学术知识主导地位,打破权力不对称。在 2021 学年期间,全球高等教育研究所(GHSM)开展了以下活动:(1) 对本科生课程模块进行差距分析;(2) 由全球学者为 40 名全球南方和北方大学生讲授非殖民化研究方法课程,这些学生填写了课前和课后调查表;(3) 与 11 名学者进行半结构式访谈,并与 4 名学生组成焦点小组,探讨高等教育研究所的非殖民化问题;对调查结果进行了专题分析。(1) 差距分析显示,在各单元的阅读中,象征性地使用黑人、少数民族和女性作者。(2) 课后调查显示,68%的人非常同意该课程增进了他们的非殖民化知识。(3) 主题分析确定了以下主题:(1) 非殖民化是对殖民遗产、种族主义和知识生产规范的挑战。(2) 非殖民化涉及关怀、包容和补偿。(3) 非殖民化课程应包含反种族主义议程、反思性教学法以及涉及学生和社区的生活体验。(4) 高等教育机构是殖民主义和排斥性的结构,应转向变革性和合作性的思维和认知方式。(5) 要实现研究的非殖民化,我们必须重新思考知识生产和传播的等级制度以及南北研究合作的政治。高等教育研究所的非殖民化必须置于人权框架内。高等院校应纳入反种族主义议程,突出本土和边缘化历史及认知方式,并创造一个无等级之分的教育环境,让学生主导非殖民化进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Higher Education
Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
160
期刊介绍: Higher Education is recognised as the leading international journal of Higher Education studies, publishing twelve separate numbers each year. Since its establishment in 1972, Higher Education has followed educational developments throughout the world in universities, polytechnics, colleges, and vocational and education institutions. It has actively endeavoured to report on developments in both public and private Higher Education sectors. Contributions have come from leading scholars from different countries while articles have tackled the problems of teachers as well as students, and of planners as well as administrators. While each Higher Education system has its own distinctive features, common problems and issues are shared internationally by researchers, teachers and institutional leaders. Higher Education offers opportunities for exchange of research results, experience and insights, and provides a forum for ongoing discussion between experts. Higher Education publishes authoritative overview articles, comparative studies and analyses of particular problems or issues. All contributions are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信