Nitrous oxide emissions and N-cycling gene abundances in a drip-fertigated (surface versus subsurface) maize crop with different N sources

IF 5.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Guillermo Guardia, Sandra García-Gutiérrez, Antonio Vallejo, Miguel A. Ibáñez, Laura Sanchez-Martin, Mónica Montoya
{"title":"Nitrous oxide emissions and N-cycling gene abundances in a drip-fertigated (surface versus subsurface) maize crop with different N sources","authors":"Guillermo Guardia, Sandra García-Gutiérrez, Antonio Vallejo, Miguel A. Ibáñez, Laura Sanchez-Martin, Mónica Montoya","doi":"10.1007/s00374-023-01791-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Surface drip fertigation has demonstrated promising results regarding the mitigation of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions. The use of subsurface irrigation may offer the possibility of reducing these emissions further due to the modification of the soil moisture profile and N allocation, both of which affect the biochemical processes leading to N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes. However, the mitigation potential of subsurface irrigation combined with different mineral nitrogen (N) fertilizers (ammonium or nitrate-based, use of nitrification inhibitors) still needs to be evaluated. To respond to this need, a 2-year field experiment was set up in central Spain to test two different drip-fertigation systems (surface and subsurface at 30 cm depth) and four N fertilization treatments (control, calcium nitrate, and ammonium sulfate with or without the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, DMPP) in an irrigated maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) crop. Nitrous oxide emissions, mineral N concentrations (ammonium, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, and nitrate, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>), and abundance of key N genes involved in nitrification and denitrification processes were measured in two soil layers (0–20 and 20–40 cm). Regardless of the irrigation system, ammonium sulfate gave the highest cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O losses in both campaigns, while calcium nitrate and the use of DMPP were the most effective strategies to abate N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes in the first and second years, respectively. Differences between irrigation systems were not statistically significant for cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, despite the clear effect on topsoil mineral N (higher NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> concentrations in surface and subsurface drip, respectively). Nitrous oxide emissions were positively correlated with soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> concentrations. Gene abundances were not a trustworthy predictor of N<sub>2</sub>O losses in the 1st year, although a clear inhibitory effect of fertilization on microbial communities (i.e., ammonia oxidizers, nitrite reducers, and N<sub>2</sub>O reducers) was observed during this campaign. During the second year, nitrifying and denitrifying genes were affected by irrigation (with higher abundances in the 20–40 cm layer in subsurface than in surface drip) and by the addition of DMPP (which had a detrimental effect on gene abundances in both irrigation systems that disappeared after the fertigation period). In conclusion, the use of DMPP or calcium nitrate instead of ammonium sulfate may enhance the chances for an additional mitigation in both surface and subsurface irrigation systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9210,"journal":{"name":"Biology and Fertility of Soils","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology and Fertility of Soils","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-023-01791-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surface drip fertigation has demonstrated promising results regarding the mitigation of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. The use of subsurface irrigation may offer the possibility of reducing these emissions further due to the modification of the soil moisture profile and N allocation, both of which affect the biochemical processes leading to N2O fluxes. However, the mitigation potential of subsurface irrigation combined with different mineral nitrogen (N) fertilizers (ammonium or nitrate-based, use of nitrification inhibitors) still needs to be evaluated. To respond to this need, a 2-year field experiment was set up in central Spain to test two different drip-fertigation systems (surface and subsurface at 30 cm depth) and four N fertilization treatments (control, calcium nitrate, and ammonium sulfate with or without the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, DMPP) in an irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) crop. Nitrous oxide emissions, mineral N concentrations (ammonium, NH4+, and nitrate, NO3), and abundance of key N genes involved in nitrification and denitrification processes were measured in two soil layers (0–20 and 20–40 cm). Regardless of the irrigation system, ammonium sulfate gave the highest cumulative N2O losses in both campaigns, while calcium nitrate and the use of DMPP were the most effective strategies to abate N2O fluxes in the first and second years, respectively. Differences between irrigation systems were not statistically significant for cumulative N2O emissions, despite the clear effect on topsoil mineral N (higher NH4+ and NO3 concentrations in surface and subsurface drip, respectively). Nitrous oxide emissions were positively correlated with soil NH4+ concentrations. Gene abundances were not a trustworthy predictor of N2O losses in the 1st year, although a clear inhibitory effect of fertilization on microbial communities (i.e., ammonia oxidizers, nitrite reducers, and N2O reducers) was observed during this campaign. During the second year, nitrifying and denitrifying genes were affected by irrigation (with higher abundances in the 20–40 cm layer in subsurface than in surface drip) and by the addition of DMPP (which had a detrimental effect on gene abundances in both irrigation systems that disappeared after the fertigation period). In conclusion, the use of DMPP or calcium nitrate instead of ammonium sulfate may enhance the chances for an additional mitigation in both surface and subsurface irrigation systems.

Abstract Image

不同氮源滴灌(地表和地下)玉米作物的氧化亚氮排放和氮循环基因丰度
地表滴灌施肥在减少一氧化二氮(N2O)排放方面取得了可喜的成果。地表下灌溉可改变土壤水分分布和氮的分配,从而进一步减少这些排放,而这两者都会影响导致一氧化二氮通量的生化过程。然而,地表下灌溉与不同的矿物氮肥(铵肥或硝酸盐肥,使用硝化抑制剂)相结合的减排潜力仍有待评估。为了满足这一需求,我们在西班牙中部进行了一项为期两年的田间试验,对灌溉玉米(玉米)作物的两种不同滴灌系统(30 厘米深的地表和地下灌溉)和四种氮肥处理(对照、硝酸钙和硫酸铵,含或不含硝化抑制剂 3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐,DMPP)进行了测试。在两个土层(0-20 厘米和 20-40 厘米)中测量了氧化亚氮排放量、矿物氮浓度(铵 NH4+ 和硝酸盐 NO3-)以及参与硝化和反硝化过程的关键氮基因的丰度。无论采用哪种灌溉系统,硫酸铵在两次试验中的累积一氧化二氮损失量都最高,而硝酸钙和使用 DMPP 分别是第一年和第二年减少一氧化二氮通量的最有效策略。尽管不同灌溉系统对表土矿物氮(地表滴灌和地下滴灌的 NH4+ 和 NO3- 浓度分别更高)有明显影响,但在累积一氧化二氮排放量方面,不同灌溉系统之间的差异在统计学上并不显著。一氧化二氮排放量与土壤中的 NH4+ 浓度呈正相关。在第一年,虽然施肥对微生物群落(即氨氧化剂、亚硝酸盐还原剂和一氧化二氮还原剂)有明显的抑制作用,但基因丰度并不是预测一氧化二氮损失的可靠指标。在第二年,硝化和反硝化基因受到灌溉(地表下 20-40 厘米层的丰度高于地表滴灌)和添加 DMPP 的影响(对两种灌溉系统中的基因丰度都有不利影响,在施肥期后消失)。总之,在地表和地下灌溉系统中使用 DMPP 或硝酸钙代替硫酸铵可能会增加额外的缓解效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology and Fertility of Soils
Biology and Fertility of Soils 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
10.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Biology and Fertility of Soils publishes in English original papers, reviews and short communications on all fundamental and applied aspects of biology – microflora and microfauna - and fertility of soils. It offers a forum for research aimed at broadening the understanding of biological functions, processes and interactions in soils, particularly concerning the increasing demands of agriculture, deforestation and industrialization. The journal includes articles on techniques and methods that evaluate processes, biogeochemical interactions and ecological stresses, and sometimes presents special issues on relevant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信