Rufus A Adedoyin, John O Makinde, Adekola B Ademoyegun, Francis Fatoye, Chidozie E Mbada
{"title":"Development and Feasibility Testing of a Remote Support Application for Adherence to Home Exercise Programs: A Randomized Pilot Study.","authors":"Rufus A Adedoyin, John O Makinde, Adekola B Ademoyegun, Francis Fatoye, Chidozie E Mbada","doi":"10.2490/prm.20230045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Poor adherence to home exercise programs (HEPs) is a significant barrier to continuity of care and eventual outcomes, thus requiring innovative mitigating approaches. This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of a remote support application (RSA) designed to encourage adherence to HEPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using standard computer programing, an RSA with administrator and user interfaces was developed for mobile phone or tablet. Consenting patients receiving physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions (n=19) were randomly assigned into the experimental group (n=10) or the control group (n=9). The experimental group received their customized HEP reminders via the RSA, whereas the control group used conventional paper handouts for HEPs. Adherence to HEPs was assessed over 4 weeks. The feasibility of the RSA was assessed using the Mobile Application Rating Scale and System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaires. Data were summarized using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adherence rate of patients in experimental group was significantly higher than that of patients in the control group after 2 weeks [median diff.=-6.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): -8.0 to -5.0; U=5.00; Z=-3.304; P=0.001; r=0.75] and 4 weeks (median diff.=-7.0, 95% CI: -8.0 to -5.0; U=0; Z=-3.695; P<0.001; r=0.84) of intervention. The RSA had a mean SUS score of 82.53±9.04 (out of 100) and a mean app quality rating score of 75.95±4.98 (out of 95).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of an RSA to improve adherence to HEPs is feasible for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"8 ","pages":"20230045"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10751247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20230045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Poor adherence to home exercise programs (HEPs) is a significant barrier to continuity of care and eventual outcomes, thus requiring innovative mitigating approaches. This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of a remote support application (RSA) designed to encourage adherence to HEPs.
Methods: Using standard computer programing, an RSA with administrator and user interfaces was developed for mobile phone or tablet. Consenting patients receiving physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions (n=19) were randomly assigned into the experimental group (n=10) or the control group (n=9). The experimental group received their customized HEP reminders via the RSA, whereas the control group used conventional paper handouts for HEPs. Adherence to HEPs was assessed over 4 weeks. The feasibility of the RSA was assessed using the Mobile Application Rating Scale and System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaires. Data were summarized using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: The adherence rate of patients in experimental group was significantly higher than that of patients in the control group after 2 weeks [median diff.=-6.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): -8.0 to -5.0; U=5.00; Z=-3.304; P=0.001; r=0.75] and 4 weeks (median diff.=-7.0, 95% CI: -8.0 to -5.0; U=0; Z=-3.695; P<0.001; r=0.84) of intervention. The RSA had a mean SUS score of 82.53±9.04 (out of 100) and a mean app quality rating score of 75.95±4.98 (out of 95).
Conclusions: The use of an RSA to improve adherence to HEPs is feasible for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.