Financial Toxicity Experiences of Patients With Cancer in Indonesia: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stevanus Pangestu MBA , Enggar Putri Harjanti MA , Ika Hana Pertiwi MA , Fanni Rencz MD, PhD , F.A. Nurdiyanto MA
{"title":"Financial Toxicity Experiences of Patients With Cancer in Indonesia: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis","authors":"Stevanus Pangestu MBA ,&nbsp;Enggar Putri Harjanti MA ,&nbsp;Ika Hana Pertiwi MA ,&nbsp;Fanni Rencz MD, PhD ,&nbsp;F.A. Nurdiyanto MA","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2023.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Financial toxicity (FT) is an important adverse effect of cancer. Recent systematic reviews have shown that FT may lead to treatment nonadherence and impaired health-related quality of life, both of which may adversely influence the survival rates of patients. However, less is known about how patients endure FT, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The purpose of this study was to explore how patients with cancer experience and cope with FT in Indonesia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted to explore the experiences of Indonesian patients with cancer. Qualitative data were analyzed using interpretive phenomenological analysis approach. We purposefully recruited 8 patients undergoing active treatment (aged 27-69 years) who had been diagnosed of cancer over 5 years before and possessed health insurance at the time of diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 2 main themes: (1) the experienced financial burden, with subthemes underinsurance, out-of-pocket nonhealthcare cancer-related costs, and negative income effect from employment disruption, and (2) the financial coping strategies, with subthemes reallocating household budget, seeking family support, rationalizing treatment decisions, and topping up insurance for family members.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This is the first interpretive phenomenological study on FT in the literature and the first qualitative FT study in Indonesia. Our findings provide insight into the occurrence of FT and coping strategies used by Indonesian patients with cancer. The subjective experiences of patients may be considered to further improve oncology care, support the need for measurement of FT, and provide mitigation programs for patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923001310/pdfft?md5=1ebaa4776c46e4bad2aa3d4e3c1200a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2212109923001310-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109923001310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Financial toxicity (FT) is an important adverse effect of cancer. Recent systematic reviews have shown that FT may lead to treatment nonadherence and impaired health-related quality of life, both of which may adversely influence the survival rates of patients. However, less is known about how patients endure FT, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The purpose of this study was to explore how patients with cancer experience and cope with FT in Indonesia.

Methods

Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted to explore the experiences of Indonesian patients with cancer. Qualitative data were analyzed using interpretive phenomenological analysis approach. We purposefully recruited 8 patients undergoing active treatment (aged 27-69 years) who had been diagnosed of cancer over 5 years before and possessed health insurance at the time of diagnosis.

Results

We identified 2 main themes: (1) the experienced financial burden, with subthemes underinsurance, out-of-pocket nonhealthcare cancer-related costs, and negative income effect from employment disruption, and (2) the financial coping strategies, with subthemes reallocating household budget, seeking family support, rationalizing treatment decisions, and topping up insurance for family members.

Conclusions

This is the first interpretive phenomenological study on FT in the literature and the first qualitative FT study in Indonesia. Our findings provide insight into the occurrence of FT and coping strategies used by Indonesian patients with cancer. The subjective experiences of patients may be considered to further improve oncology care, support the need for measurement of FT, and provide mitigation programs for patients.

印度尼西亚癌症患者的经济毒性经历:诠释现象学分析》。
目的:经济毒性(FT)是癌症的一个重要不良反应。最近的系统综述显示,经济毒性可能导致不坚持治疗和健康相关生活质量受损,这两者都可能对患者的生存率产生不利影响。然而,人们对患者如何忍受 FT 却知之甚少,尤其是在中低收入国家。本研究旨在探讨印度尼西亚的癌症患者如何经历和应对 FT:方法:对印尼癌症患者进行了半结构化深度访谈,以探讨他们的经历。采用解释现象学分析方法对定性数据进行分析。我们有目的地招募了 8 名正在接受积极治疗的患者(年龄在 27-69 岁之间),他们在 5 年前被诊断出患有癌症,并且在诊断时拥有医疗保险:我们确定了两大主题:(1) 所经历的经济负担,包括保险不足、自付非医疗癌症相关费用和就业中断带来的负收入影响等副主题;(2) 经济应对策略,包括重新分配家庭预算、寻求家庭支持、合理化治疗决定和为家庭成员补充保险等副主题:这是文献中第一项关于家庭治疗的解释性现象学研究,也是印度尼西亚的第一项家庭治疗定性研究。我们的研究结果让我们深入了解了印尼癌症患者的家庭困境发生情况和应对策略。患者的主观体验可用于进一步改善肿瘤治疗,支持对FT进行测量的必要性,并为患者提供缓解方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信