Factors associated with infant sex and preterm birth status for selected birth defects from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Eva M. Williford, Wei Yang, Meredith M. Howley, Chen Ma, Ronnie T. Collins, Kari A. Weber, Dominique Heinke, Julie M. Petersen, A. J. Agopian, Natalie P. Archer, Andrew F. Olshan, Lindsay A. Williams, Marilyn L. Browne, Gary M. Shaw, the National Birth Defects Prevention Study
{"title":"Factors associated with infant sex and preterm birth status for selected birth defects from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2011","authors":"Eva M. Williford,&nbsp;Wei Yang,&nbsp;Meredith M. Howley,&nbsp;Chen Ma,&nbsp;Ronnie T. Collins,&nbsp;Kari A. Weber,&nbsp;Dominique Heinke,&nbsp;Julie M. Petersen,&nbsp;A. J. Agopian,&nbsp;Natalie P. Archer,&nbsp;Andrew F. Olshan,&nbsp;Lindsay A. Williams,&nbsp;Marilyn L. Browne,&nbsp;Gary M. Shaw,&nbsp;the National Birth Defects Prevention Study","doi":"10.1002/bdr2.2294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Birth defects and preterm birth co-occur, with some overlapping risk factors. Many birth defects and preterm births tend to have a male preponderance. We explored potential risk factors impacting sex and preterm (&lt;37 weeks of gestation) birth differences among infants with selected birth defects delivered from 1997 to 2011 using data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The NBDPS was a large multisite, population-based case–control study. Using random forests, we identified important predictors of male preterm, female preterm, and male term, each compared with female term births for each birth defect. Using logistic regression, we estimated odds ratios for associations between important predictors and sex-preterm birth status by birth defect.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We examined 11,379 infants with nine specific birth defects. The top 10 most important predictors of sex-preterm birth status from the random forests varied greatly across the birth defects and sex-preterm comparisons within a given defect group, with several being novel factors. However, one consistency was that short interpregnancy interval was associated with sex-preterm birth status for many of the studied birth defects. Although obesity has been identified as a risk factor for preterm birth and birth defects in other research, it was not associated with sex-preterm birth status for any of the examined defects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We confirmed expected associations for sex-preterm birth status differences and found new potential risk factors for further exploration among the studied birth defects.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9121,"journal":{"name":"Birth Defects Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth Defects Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Birth defects and preterm birth co-occur, with some overlapping risk factors. Many birth defects and preterm births tend to have a male preponderance. We explored potential risk factors impacting sex and preterm (<37 weeks of gestation) birth differences among infants with selected birth defects delivered from 1997 to 2011 using data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS).

Methods

The NBDPS was a large multisite, population-based case–control study. Using random forests, we identified important predictors of male preterm, female preterm, and male term, each compared with female term births for each birth defect. Using logistic regression, we estimated odds ratios for associations between important predictors and sex-preterm birth status by birth defect.

Results

We examined 11,379 infants with nine specific birth defects. The top 10 most important predictors of sex-preterm birth status from the random forests varied greatly across the birth defects and sex-preterm comparisons within a given defect group, with several being novel factors. However, one consistency was that short interpregnancy interval was associated with sex-preterm birth status for many of the studied birth defects. Although obesity has been identified as a risk factor for preterm birth and birth defects in other research, it was not associated with sex-preterm birth status for any of the examined defects.

Conclusions

We confirmed expected associations for sex-preterm birth status differences and found new potential risk factors for further exploration among the studied birth defects.

1997-2011 年全国出生缺陷预防研究(National Birth Defects Prevention Study)中某些出生缺陷的婴儿性别和早产状况的相关因素。
背景:出生缺陷和早产是并发症,有一些重叠的风险因素。许多出生缺陷和早产往往以男性居多。我们探究了影响性别和早产的潜在风险因素(方法:NBDPS 是一项大型的、多学科的研究:NBDPS 是一项大型多地点、基于人群的病例对照研究。我们利用随机森林确定了男性早产儿、女性早产儿和男性足月儿的重要预测因素,并将每种出生缺陷的预测因素与女性足月儿进行了比较。利用逻辑回归,我们估算了重要预测因素与出生缺陷的性别-早产状况之间的相关几率:我们对 11,379 名患有九种特定出生缺陷的婴儿进行了研究。从随机森林中得出的性别早产状况最重要的前 10 个预测因素在不同出生缺陷和特定缺陷组内的性别早产比较中差异很大,其中有几个是新因素。不过,有一点是一致的,即在所研究的许多出生缺陷中,中孕期间隔短与性别早产状态有关。虽然在其他研究中,肥胖被认为是早产和出生缺陷的一个风险因素,但在所研究的任何缺陷中,肥胖都与性别早产状态无关:我们证实了性别-早产状况差异的预期关联,并在所研究的出生缺陷中发现了有待进一步探讨的新的潜在风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth Defects Research
Birth Defects Research Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: The journal Birth Defects Research publishes original research and reviews in areas related to the etiology of adverse developmental and reproductive outcome. In particular the journal is devoted to the publication of original scientific research that contributes to the understanding of the biology of embryonic development and the prenatal causative factors and mechanisms leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely structural and functional birth defects, pregnancy loss, postnatal functional defects in the human population, and to the identification of prenatal factors and biological mechanisms that reduce these risks. Adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes may have genetic, environmental, nutritional or epigenetic causes. Accordingly, the journal Birth Defects Research takes an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in its organization and publication strategy. The journal Birth Defects Research contains separate sections for clinical and molecular teratology, developmental and reproductive toxicology, and reviews in developmental biology to acknowledge and accommodate the integrative nature of research in this field. Each section has a dedicated editor who is a leader in his/her field and who has full editorial authority in his/her area.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信