Reconciling grain production and environmental costs during rural livelihood transitions: a simulation-based approach in southern China

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Xiaoxing Qi, Jialong Xie, Hangyu Huang, Jianchun Li, Wenhua Yuan
{"title":"Reconciling grain production and environmental costs during rural livelihood transitions: a simulation-based approach in southern China","authors":"Xiaoxing Qi,&nbsp;Jialong Xie,&nbsp;Hangyu Huang,&nbsp;Jianchun Li,&nbsp;Wenhua Yuan","doi":"10.1007/s12571-023-01427-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tension is building up between the need to provide food for eight billion humans and the necessity to safeguard their environment. In many parts of the world, the ongoing transition of farmers’ livelihoods is creating even greater uncertainty in addressing the dual challenges of food security and environmental sustainability. Using a simulation-based approach, this study develops an operational framework to explore ways to reconcile rice production and environmental costs from the perspective of the heterogeneity of farmers’ individual characteristics, farmland transfer strategies, and grain production. Using data from land-use images as well as farming household, plot, and farmland quality surveys, we tested our study framework in Taojiang County, Hunan Province, southern China. The results demonstrate that under the combined influence of rural livelihood transitions and targeted rice subsidies, cultivated land in Taojiang County has rapidly concentrated in large-scale farmers over the past decade. This concentration has resulted in higher levels of carbon emissions and water pollution while stabilizing the local supply of grain. Our findings suggest that to reduce the environmental costs of grain production during rural livelihood transitions, policymakers should develop robust policy instruments to encourage medium-scale cultivation patterns while guiding large-scale farmers optimize their inputs. In addition, more support should be provided to smaller-scale, environmentally friendly production patterns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":567,"journal":{"name":"Food Security","volume":"16 3","pages":"781 - 799"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-023-01427-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tension is building up between the need to provide food for eight billion humans and the necessity to safeguard their environment. In many parts of the world, the ongoing transition of farmers’ livelihoods is creating even greater uncertainty in addressing the dual challenges of food security and environmental sustainability. Using a simulation-based approach, this study develops an operational framework to explore ways to reconcile rice production and environmental costs from the perspective of the heterogeneity of farmers’ individual characteristics, farmland transfer strategies, and grain production. Using data from land-use images as well as farming household, plot, and farmland quality surveys, we tested our study framework in Taojiang County, Hunan Province, southern China. The results demonstrate that under the combined influence of rural livelihood transitions and targeted rice subsidies, cultivated land in Taojiang County has rapidly concentrated in large-scale farmers over the past decade. This concentration has resulted in higher levels of carbon emissions and water pollution while stabilizing the local supply of grain. Our findings suggest that to reduce the environmental costs of grain production during rural livelihood transitions, policymakers should develop robust policy instruments to encourage medium-scale cultivation patterns while guiding large-scale farmers optimize their inputs. In addition, more support should be provided to smaller-scale, environmentally friendly production patterns.

Abstract Image

协调农村生计转型期间的粮食生产与环境成本:基于模拟的中国南方方法
为 80 亿人提供粮食的需要与保护环境的必要性之间的矛盾正在加剧。在世界许多地区,农民生计的持续转型给应对粮食安全和环境可持续性的双重挑战带来了更大的不确定性。本研究采用基于模拟的方法,建立了一个操作框架,从农民的个体特征、农田流转策略和粮食生产的异质性角度,探索协调水稻生产和环境成本的方法。我们利用土地利用影像数据以及农户、地块和耕地质量调查数据,在中国南方的湖南省桃江县检验了我们的研究框架。结果表明,在农村生计转型和定向水稻补贴的共同影响下,桃江县的耕地在过去十年中迅速向规模化农户集中。这种集中在稳定当地粮食供应的同时,也造成了更高的碳排放和水污染。我们的研究结果表明,要降低农村生计转型期粮食生产的环境成本,政策制定者应制定强有力的政策工具,鼓励中等规模的种植模式,同时引导大规模农户优化投入。此外,还应为小规模、环境友好型生产模式提供更多支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Security
Food Security FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
6.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Security is a wide audience, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to the procurement, access (economic and physical), and quality of food, in all its dimensions. Scales range from the individual to communities, and to the world food system. We strive to publish high-quality scientific articles, where quality includes, but is not limited to, the quality and clarity of text, and the validity of methods and approaches. Food Security is the initiative of a distinguished international group of scientists from different disciplines who hold a deep concern for the challenge of global food security, together with a vision of the power of shared knowledge as a means of meeting that challenge. To address the challenge of global food security, the journal seeks to address the constraints - physical, biological and socio-economic - which not only limit food production but also the ability of people to access a healthy diet. From this perspective, the journal covers the following areas: Global food needs: the mismatch between population and the ability to provide adequate nutrition Global food potential and global food production Natural constraints to satisfying global food needs: § Climate, climate variability, and climate change § Desertification and flooding § Natural disasters § Soils, soil quality and threats to soils, edaphic and other abiotic constraints to production § Biotic constraints to production, pathogens, pests, and weeds in their effects on sustainable production The sociological contexts of food production, access, quality, and consumption. Nutrition, food quality and food safety. Socio-political factors that impinge on the ability to satisfy global food needs: § Land, agricultural and food policy § International relations and trade § Access to food § Financial policy § Wars and ethnic unrest Research policies and priorities to ensure food security in its various dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信