The efficacy of non-pharmacological and non-pacing therapies in preventing vasovagal syncope: Tilt training, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and yoga - A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Abdulmajeed Alharbi , Momin Shah , Monik Gupta , Kassidy Rejent , Mona Mahmoud , Anas Alsughayer , Ahmad Alryheal , Wasef Sayeh , Rabbia Siddiqi , Abed Jabr , Eun Seo Kwak , Sadik Khuder , Ragheb Assaly , Blair Grubb
{"title":"The efficacy of non-pharmacological and non-pacing therapies in preventing vasovagal syncope: Tilt training, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and yoga - A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Abdulmajeed Alharbi ,&nbsp;Momin Shah ,&nbsp;Monik Gupta ,&nbsp;Kassidy Rejent ,&nbsp;Mona Mahmoud ,&nbsp;Anas Alsughayer ,&nbsp;Ahmad Alryheal ,&nbsp;Wasef Sayeh ,&nbsp;Rabbia Siddiqi ,&nbsp;Abed Jabr ,&nbsp;Eun Seo Kwak ,&nbsp;Sadik Khuder ,&nbsp;Ragheb Assaly ,&nbsp;Blair Grubb","doi":"10.1016/j.autneu.2023.103144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is a prevalent condition characterized by a sudden drop in blood pressure and heart rate, leading to a brief loss of consciousness and </span>postural control. Recurrent episodes of VVS significantly impact the </span>quality of life<span> and are a common reason for emergency department<span> visits. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as tilt training, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and yoga, have been proposed as potential treatments for VVS. However, their efficacy in preventing VVS remains uncertain.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review<span> and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to March 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing non-pharmacological interventions with control in preventing VVS recurrence. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate of VVS episodes.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1130 participants from 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall mean effect size for non-pharmacological interventions versus control was 0.245 (95 % CI: 0.128–0.471, <em>p</em>-value &lt;0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that yoga had the largest effect size (odds ratio 0.068, 95 % CI: 0.018–0.250), while tilt training had the lowest effect size (odds ratio 0.402, 95 % CI: 0.171–0.946) compared to control. Physical counter pressure maneuvers demonstrated an odds ratio of 0.294 (95 % CI: 0.165–0.524) compared to control.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Non-pharmacological interventions show promise in preventing recurrent VVS episodes. Yoga, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and tilt training can be considered as viable treatment options. Further research, including randomized studies comparing pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, is needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these interventions for VVS treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55410,"journal":{"name":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566070223000735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is a prevalent condition characterized by a sudden drop in blood pressure and heart rate, leading to a brief loss of consciousness and postural control. Recurrent episodes of VVS significantly impact the quality of life and are a common reason for emergency department visits. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as tilt training, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and yoga, have been proposed as potential treatments for VVS. However, their efficacy in preventing VVS remains uncertain.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to March 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing non-pharmacological interventions with control in preventing VVS recurrence. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate of VVS episodes.

Results

A total of 1130 participants from 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall mean effect size for non-pharmacological interventions versus control was 0.245 (95 % CI: 0.128–0.471, p-value <0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that yoga had the largest effect size (odds ratio 0.068, 95 % CI: 0.018–0.250), while tilt training had the lowest effect size (odds ratio 0.402, 95 % CI: 0.171–0.946) compared to control. Physical counter pressure maneuvers demonstrated an odds ratio of 0.294 (95 % CI: 0.165–0.524) compared to control.

Conclusion

Non-pharmacological interventions show promise in preventing recurrent VVS episodes. Yoga, physical counter pressure maneuvers, and tilt training can be considered as viable treatment options. Further research, including randomized studies comparing pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, is needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these interventions for VVS treatment.

非药物和非起搏疗法对预防血管迷走性晕厥的疗效:倾斜训练、物理反压法和瑜伽 - 系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景脉搏迷走性晕厥(VVS)是一种常见病,其特点是血压和心率突然下降,导致短暂的意识丧失和体位控制能力丧失。血管迷走性晕厥的反复发作严重影响患者的生活质量,也是急诊就诊的常见原因。倾斜训练、物理反压动作和瑜伽等非药物干预措施已被提出作为 VVS 的潜在治疗方法。方法按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统综述和荟萃分析,检索了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Embase 中截至 2023 年 3 月的随机对照试验,这些试验比较了非药物干预措施和对照措施在预防 VVS 复发方面的效果。荟萃分析共纳入了 18 项研究中的 1130 名参与者。非药物干预与对照组相比的总体平均效应大小为 0.245(95 % CI:0.128-0.471,P 值为 0.001)。分组分析显示,与对照组相比,瑜伽的效果最大(几率比0.068,95% CI:0.018-0.250),而倾斜训练的效果最小(几率比0.402,95% CI:0.171-0.946)。与对照组相比,物理反压操作的几率比为 0.294(95 % CI:0.165-0.524)。瑜伽、物理反压操作和倾斜训练可视为可行的治疗方案。需要进一步开展研究,包括比较药物和非药物方法的随机研究,以评估这些干预措施治疗 VVS 的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: This is an international journal with broad coverage of all aspects of the autonomic nervous system in man and animals. The main areas of interest include the innervation of blood vessels and viscera, autonomic ganglia, efferent and afferent autonomic pathways, and autonomic nuclei and pathways in the central nervous system. The Editors will consider papers that deal with any aspect of the autonomic nervous system, including structure, physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, development, evolution, ageing, behavioural aspects, integrative role and influence on emotional and physical states of the body. Interdisciplinary studies will be encouraged. Studies dealing with human pathology will be also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信