MobLoc: CSI-Based Location Fingerprinting With MUSIC

Stepan Mazokha;Fanchen Bao;George Sklivanitis;Jason O. Hallstrom
{"title":"MobLoc: CSI-Based Location Fingerprinting With MUSIC","authors":"Stepan Mazokha;Fanchen Bao;George Sklivanitis;Jason O. Hallstrom","doi":"10.1109/JISPIN.2023.3336609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many CSI-based localization methods have been proposed over the last decade. Fingerprinting has been one of the highest achieving approaches due to its capacity to capture environmental characteristics that are not readily captured using classic localization mechanisms such as multilateration. However, oftentimes the proposed methods are limited by reliance on large-scale training datasets. Further, methods are rarely evaluated on nonstationary devices, which are the most common in real-world environments. In our work, we address these challenges by introducing MobLoc. We adopt MUSIC pseudospectrum-based fingerprinting, which can benefit from, but does not heavily rely upon a large number of packets for each fingerprint. To evaluate our method, we leverage a publicly available dataset of passively collected CSI measurements, DLoc (Ayyalasomayajula et al., 2020), where an emitter sends signals in motion. We also benchmark MobLoc against a series of state-of-the-art localization methods. The results demonstrate that our method outperforms SpotFi (Kotaru et al., 2015), EntLoc (Chen et al., 2019), and AngLo (Chen et al., 2020), and falls very short of achieving DLoc accuracy. On the DLoc dataset, MobLoc achieves 0.33 m median (and 0.82 m, 90th percentile) localization error in a simple environment and 1.15 m median (2.59 m, 90th percentile) localization error in a complex environment. However, despite MobLoc not exceeding DLoc's accuracy, we consider its performance as a tradeoff for computational resources required to deploy the method in a real-world environment. We anticipate that this advantage will enable the adoption of MobLoc in city-scape localization systems, where the cost of computational resources is key.","PeriodicalId":100621,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Indoor and Seamless Positioning and Navigation","volume":"1 ","pages":"231-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10333260","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Indoor and Seamless Positioning and Navigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10333260/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many CSI-based localization methods have been proposed over the last decade. Fingerprinting has been one of the highest achieving approaches due to its capacity to capture environmental characteristics that are not readily captured using classic localization mechanisms such as multilateration. However, oftentimes the proposed methods are limited by reliance on large-scale training datasets. Further, methods are rarely evaluated on nonstationary devices, which are the most common in real-world environments. In our work, we address these challenges by introducing MobLoc. We adopt MUSIC pseudospectrum-based fingerprinting, which can benefit from, but does not heavily rely upon a large number of packets for each fingerprint. To evaluate our method, we leverage a publicly available dataset of passively collected CSI measurements, DLoc (Ayyalasomayajula et al., 2020), where an emitter sends signals in motion. We also benchmark MobLoc against a series of state-of-the-art localization methods. The results demonstrate that our method outperforms SpotFi (Kotaru et al., 2015), EntLoc (Chen et al., 2019), and AngLo (Chen et al., 2020), and falls very short of achieving DLoc accuracy. On the DLoc dataset, MobLoc achieves 0.33 m median (and 0.82 m, 90th percentile) localization error in a simple environment and 1.15 m median (2.59 m, 90th percentile) localization error in a complex environment. However, despite MobLoc not exceeding DLoc's accuracy, we consider its performance as a tradeoff for computational resources required to deploy the method in a real-world environment. We anticipate that this advantage will enable the adoption of MobLoc in city-scape localization systems, where the cost of computational resources is key.
MobLoc:利用音乐进行基于 CSI 的位置指纹识别
在过去十年中,提出了许多基于 CSI 的定位方法。由于指纹识别法能够捕捉到传统定位机制(如多方位定位)无法轻易捕捉到的环境特征,因此成为成就最高的方法之一。然而,所提出的方法往往因依赖大规模训练数据集而受到限制。此外,这些方法很少在非稳态设备上进行评估,而非稳态设备在现实环境中最为常见。在我们的工作中,我们通过引入 MobLoc 来应对这些挑战。我们采用了基于 MUSIC 伪频谱的指纹识别技术,它可以受益于每个指纹识别,但并不严重依赖于大量数据包。为了评估我们的方法,我们利用了一个公开可用的被动收集 CSI 测量数据集 DLoc(Ayyalasomayajula 等人,2020 年),其中发射器在运动中发送信号。我们还将 MobLoc 与一系列最先进的定位方法进行了比较。结果表明,我们的方法优于 SpotFi(Kotaru 等人,2015 年)、EntLoc(Chen 等人,2019 年)和 AngLo(Chen 等人,2020 年),但在 DLoc 的准确性上却相差甚远。在 DLoc 数据集上,MobLoc 在简单环境中的定位误差中位数为 0.33 米(第 90 百分位数为 0.82 米),在复杂环境中的定位误差中位数为 1.15 米(第 90 百分位数为 2.59 米)。不过,尽管 MobLoc 没有超过 DLoc 的精确度,但我们认为其性能是在真实环境中部署该方法所需的计算资源方面的一种权衡。我们预计,这一优势将使 MobLoc 能够在城市景观定位系统中得到采用,因为计算资源的成本是关键所在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信