{"title":"Faculty intention to implement data analytics in the accounting curricula","authors":"Hui Xu , Yuebing Liu , John Peter Krahel","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The primary purpose of this study is to examine the factors behind accounting educators’ intention to incorporate data analytics into the curriculum. Using the theory of planned behavior, we theorize that attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control influence accounting educators’ intentions to implement data analytics into the accounting curriculum. We test our theory using a structural equation model (SEM) with 278 accounting faculty members in the United States, and we find that all three factors are significantly associated with faculty members’ intention to adopt data analytics into the accounting curriculum. External incentives, such as promotions, teaching awards, or course releases, significantly increase educators’ willingness to teach data analytics. In addition, faculty who find data analytics intrinsically interesting or enjoyable are more likely to incorporate the subject into the curriculum. Perceived expectations from the department, administration, or employers also contribute to the faculty’s intention to teach data analytics. Lastly, faculty are more likely to incorporate data analytics if sufficient instruction materials are provided, it is easy to grade the assignments, or it is easy to work with other colleagues. Implications for accounting education are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575123000544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The primary purpose of this study is to examine the factors behind accounting educators’ intention to incorporate data analytics into the curriculum. Using the theory of planned behavior, we theorize that attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control influence accounting educators’ intentions to implement data analytics into the accounting curriculum. We test our theory using a structural equation model (SEM) with 278 accounting faculty members in the United States, and we find that all three factors are significantly associated with faculty members’ intention to adopt data analytics into the accounting curriculum. External incentives, such as promotions, teaching awards, or course releases, significantly increase educators’ willingness to teach data analytics. In addition, faculty who find data analytics intrinsically interesting or enjoyable are more likely to incorporate the subject into the curriculum. Perceived expectations from the department, administration, or employers also contribute to the faculty’s intention to teach data analytics. Lastly, faculty are more likely to incorporate data analytics if sufficient instruction materials are provided, it is easy to grade the assignments, or it is easy to work with other colleagues. Implications for accounting education are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.