Fetal congenital talipes equinovarus: genomic abnormalities and obstetric follow-up results.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Meiying Cai, Jiansong Lin, Yanting Que, Liangpu Xu, Na Lin, Hailong Huang
{"title":"Fetal congenital talipes equinovarus: genomic abnormalities and obstetric follow-up results.","authors":"Meiying Cai, Jiansong Lin, Yanting Que, Liangpu Xu, Na Lin, Hailong Huang","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2023.2299113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The etiology of congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) is unknown, and the relationship between chromosome microdeletion/microduplication and fetal CTEV is rarely reported. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed fetal CTEV to explore the relationship among the CTEV phenotype, chromosome microdeletion/microduplication, and obstetric outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Chromosome karyotype analysis and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array were performed for the 68 fetuses with CTEV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An SNP array was performed for 68 fetuses with CTEV; pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in eight cases (11.8%, 8/68). In addition to one case consistent with karyotype analysis, the SNP array revealed seven additional pathogenic CNVs, including three with 22q11.21 microdeletions, two with 17p12p11.2 microduplications, one with 15q11.2 microdeletions, and one with 7q11.23 microduplications. Of the seven cases carrying pathogenic CNVs, three were tested for family genetics; of these, one was <i>de novo</i>, and two were inherited from either the father or mother. In total, 68 fetuses with CTEV were initially identified, of which 66 cases successfully followed-up. Of these, 9 were terminated, 2 died in utero, and 55 were live births. In 9 cases, no clinical manifestations of CTEV were found at birth; the false-positive rate of prenatal ultrasound CTEVdiagnosis was thus 13.6% (9/66).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CTEV was associated with chromosome microdeletion/microduplication, the most common of which was 22q11.21 microdeletion, followed by 17p12p11.2 microduplication. Thus, further genomic detection is recommended for fetuses with CTEV showing no abnormalities on conventional karyotype analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2023.2299113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The etiology of congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) is unknown, and the relationship between chromosome microdeletion/microduplication and fetal CTEV is rarely reported. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed fetal CTEV to explore the relationship among the CTEV phenotype, chromosome microdeletion/microduplication, and obstetric outcomes.

Methods: Chromosome karyotype analysis and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array were performed for the 68 fetuses with CTEV.

Results: An SNP array was performed for 68 fetuses with CTEV; pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in eight cases (11.8%, 8/68). In addition to one case consistent with karyotype analysis, the SNP array revealed seven additional pathogenic CNVs, including three with 22q11.21 microdeletions, two with 17p12p11.2 microduplications, one with 15q11.2 microdeletions, and one with 7q11.23 microduplications. Of the seven cases carrying pathogenic CNVs, three were tested for family genetics; of these, one was de novo, and two were inherited from either the father or mother. In total, 68 fetuses with CTEV were initially identified, of which 66 cases successfully followed-up. Of these, 9 were terminated, 2 died in utero, and 55 were live births. In 9 cases, no clinical manifestations of CTEV were found at birth; the false-positive rate of prenatal ultrasound CTEVdiagnosis was thus 13.6% (9/66).

Conclusion: CTEV was associated with chromosome microdeletion/microduplication, the most common of which was 22q11.21 microdeletion, followed by 17p12p11.2 microduplication. Thus, further genomic detection is recommended for fetuses with CTEV showing no abnormalities on conventional karyotype analysis.

胎儿先天性马蹄内翻足:基因组异常和产科随访结果。
目的:先天性马蹄内翻足(CTEV)的病因不明,染色体微缺失/微重复与胎儿CTEV之间的关系也鲜有报道。在这项研究中,我们对胎儿CTEV进行了回顾性分析,以探讨CTEV表型、染色体微缺失/微重复与产科结局之间的关系:方法:对68名CTEV胎儿进行染色体核型分析和单核苷酸多态性(SNP)阵列分析:结果:对 68 例 CTEV 胎儿进行了 SNP 阵列分析,其中 8 例(11.8%,8/68)检测到致病性拷贝数变异(CNV)。除了一例与核型分析一致的病例外,SNP 阵列还发现了另外七例致病性 CNV,包括三例 22q11.21 微缺失、两例 17p12p11.2 微重复、一例 15q11.2 微缺失和一例 7q11.23 微重复。在 7 例携带致病性 CNV 的病例中,有 3 例进行了家族遗传学检测;其中 1 例为新发病例,2 例为父亲或母亲的遗传病例。共初步鉴定出 68 例患有 CTEV 的胎儿,其中 66 例成功进行了随访。其中 9 例终止妊娠,2 例死于宫内,55 例为活产。有 9 例在出生时未发现 CTEV 的临床表现;因此,产前超声 CTEV 诊断的假阳性率为 13.6%(9/66):结论:CTEV 与染色体微缺失/微重复有关,其中最常见的是 22q11.21 微缺失,其次是 17p12p11.2 微重复。因此,建议对常规核型分析未显示异常的 CTEV 胎儿进行进一步的基因组检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信