A long-term follow up of the laparoscopically harvested free omental flap for breast reconstruction

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Microsurgery Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1002/micr.31137
Anouk A. E. Claessens MD, Martijn A. van Onna MD, Sabrina Maaskant MD, PhD, Coralien L. Broekhuysen MD
{"title":"A long-term follow up of the laparoscopically harvested free omental flap for breast reconstruction","authors":"Anouk A. E. Claessens MD,&nbsp;Martijn A. van Onna MD,&nbsp;Sabrina Maaskant MD, PhD,&nbsp;Coralien L. Broekhuysen MD","doi":"10.1002/micr.31137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There are different types of reconstruction after mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery. Autologous reconstructions are nowadays more often preferred over implant-based reconstructions for many reasons. A more natural looking breast with a durable long-term result is one of the advantages. The greater omentum is frequently used in the general field of reconstructive surgery but has not been widely adopted in breast surgery. This report is the first larger series of patients who underwent a breast reconstruction using the laparoscopically harvested omental free flap (LHOFF). The aim of this report is to provide information about indication, surgical technique, short- and long-term complications, and patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcomes and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients underwent a breast reconstruction with the LHOFF from 2014 to 2021 in Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands. All patients underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy prior to the reconstruction to examine whether the volume of omentum was deemed sufficient. Outcome measures included the Breast-Q for HR-QoL, patient satisfaction, short- and long-term complications, and abdominal complaints related to the transplanted omentum. Surgical data were retrieved retrospectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-six patients were included in this article. Patients were 40 to 71 years old with a mean BMI of 21.5 (range 17.0–25.0). Mean weight of the omental free flap was 228 g (range 112–395). Four out of 26 cases underwent surgery due to venous congestion. There was one case of flap failure due to venous thrombosis. Mean time of follow-up was 54 months (range 8–179). Secondary corrections include a nipple reconstruction (<i>n</i> = 11), lipofilling (<i>n</i> = 11), a contralateral breast reduction (<i>n</i> = 3) or a breast implant (<i>n</i> = 2). Patients reported improvement in HR-QoL and good satisfaction with aesthetic outcomes. No abdominal complications were reported during the follow-up period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The LHOFF is an autologous breast reconstruction technique that results in a soft, small breast with natural ptosis and minimal donor site morbidities. Patients report satisfactory aesthetic outcomes and good quality of life. The main limitation of this technique is the limited amount of volume of the omentum and the possible need for secondary corrections. No abdominal complications were reported. In the future, larger prospective studies are required to support implementation of the LHOFF reconstruction on a broader scale.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.31137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There are different types of reconstruction after mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery. Autologous reconstructions are nowadays more often preferred over implant-based reconstructions for many reasons. A more natural looking breast with a durable long-term result is one of the advantages. The greater omentum is frequently used in the general field of reconstructive surgery but has not been widely adopted in breast surgery. This report is the first larger series of patients who underwent a breast reconstruction using the laparoscopically harvested omental free flap (LHOFF). The aim of this report is to provide information about indication, surgical technique, short- and long-term complications, and patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcomes and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL).

Methods

Patients underwent a breast reconstruction with the LHOFF from 2014 to 2021 in Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands. All patients underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy prior to the reconstruction to examine whether the volume of omentum was deemed sufficient. Outcome measures included the Breast-Q for HR-QoL, patient satisfaction, short- and long-term complications, and abdominal complaints related to the transplanted omentum. Surgical data were retrieved retrospectively.

Results

Twenty-six patients were included in this article. Patients were 40 to 71 years old with a mean BMI of 21.5 (range 17.0–25.0). Mean weight of the omental free flap was 228 g (range 112–395). Four out of 26 cases underwent surgery due to venous congestion. There was one case of flap failure due to venous thrombosis. Mean time of follow-up was 54 months (range 8–179). Secondary corrections include a nipple reconstruction (n = 11), lipofilling (n = 11), a contralateral breast reduction (n = 3) or a breast implant (n = 2). Patients reported improvement in HR-QoL and good satisfaction with aesthetic outcomes. No abdominal complications were reported during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

The LHOFF is an autologous breast reconstruction technique that results in a soft, small breast with natural ptosis and minimal donor site morbidities. Patients report satisfactory aesthetic outcomes and good quality of life. The main limitation of this technique is the limited amount of volume of the omentum and the possible need for secondary corrections. No abdominal complications were reported. In the future, larger prospective studies are required to support implementation of the LHOFF reconstruction on a broader scale.

腹腔镜下游离网膜瓣用于乳房再造的长期随访。
背景:乳房切除术和保乳手术后有不同类型的重建。由于多种原因,自体乳房再造比假体乳房再造更受青睐。自体乳房外观更自然、效果更持久是其优势之一。大网膜常用于一般的整形外科领域,但尚未广泛应用于乳房手术。本报告是第一例使用腹腔镜大网膜游离瓣(LHOFF)进行乳房重建的较大系列患者。本报告旨在提供有关适应症、手术技术、短期和长期并发症以及患者对美学效果和健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)满意度的信息:方法:2014年至2021年期间,患者在荷兰维尔德霍芬的马西玛医疗中心接受了LHOFF乳房重建手术。所有患者在重建前都接受了腹腔镜诊断,以检查网膜的体积是否足够。结果测量包括乳房质量(Breast-Q)、HR-QoL、患者满意度、短期和长期并发症以及与移植网膜有关的腹部不适。手术数据以回顾性方式进行检索:本文共纳入 26 例患者。患者年龄在 40 至 71 岁之间,平均体重指数为 21.5(范围为 17.0-25.0)。网膜游离瓣的平均重量为 228 克(范围 112-395)。26 例中有 4 例因静脉充血而接受手术。有一例因静脉血栓导致皮瓣失败。平均随访时间为 54 个月(8-179 个月)。二次矫正包括乳头重建(11 例)、脂肪填充(11 例)、对侧乳房缩小(3 例)或乳房植入(2 例)。患者报告说,他们的心率-生活质量有所改善,对美学效果非常满意。随访期间没有腹部并发症的报告:结论:LHOFF是一种自体乳房重建技术,它能使乳房柔软、小巧、下垂自然,并将供体部位的发病率降至最低。患者对美学效果和生活质量都表示满意。这种技术的主要局限是网膜的体积有限,可能需要二次矫正。没有腹部并发症的报道。今后,需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,以支持在更大范围内实施 LHOFF 重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信