Flexible CO2 Laser in Therapeutic Bronchoscopy: Initial Experiences in a Tertiary Center.

IF 3.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Gabriel Ortiz-Jaimes, John Mullon, Darlene Nelson, Janani Reisenauer, David Midthun, Eric Edell, Dagny Anderson, Maria Vargas-Brochero, Robert Petrossian, Ryan Kern
{"title":"Flexible CO2 Laser in Therapeutic Bronchoscopy: Initial Experiences in a Tertiary Center.","authors":"Gabriel Ortiz-Jaimes, John Mullon, Darlene Nelson, Janani Reisenauer, David Midthun, Eric Edell, Dagny Anderson, Maria Vargas-Brochero, Robert Petrossian, Ryan Kern","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CO2 Laser (CO2L) technology deployable through flexible endoscopes now allows for their use throughout the airway, although published data are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of CO2L bronchoscopic procedures, excluding glottic and subglottic interventions. Procedural success was defined as >50% visual reduction in airway obstruction in the area treated or resolution of the procedural indication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two procedures were performed on 36 patients. Nonmalignant indications comprised 66%: stent-associated granulation tissue (28%), granulomatosis with polyangiitis lesions (23%), and lung transplant-related granulation tissue (16%) were the most common. Bronchoscopic access was flexible only in 81% and primarily rigid (combined with flexible) in 18%. The site of intervention was the trachea at 19%, the mainstem at 56%, and lobar/segmental airways at 45%. Procedural success was 89%. CO2L was used exclusively in 19%; in 81%, additional techniques were required, most commonly balloon dilation (59%), cryo-debulking (23%), and rigid dilation (16%). Malignant indications had a nonsignificant trend toward requiring adjuvant techniques ( P =0.05). Seventy-six percent of the patients required more than 1 procedure. CO2L exclusive cases had no statistically different needs for subsequent therapeutic bronchoscopies ( P =0.10) or time to reintervention (109 vs. 41 days, P =0.07), and reintervention-free survival was similar ( P =0.10) and difficult to predict. The complication rate attributable to CO2L was 2.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CO2L is a safe and useful tool when precise cutting and vaporization are desired. Its use in multi-modality approaches has high levels of success in adequately selected lesions, adding an ablative potential to dilation techniques. Vasculitis-associated scars/webs and granulation tissue (including stent-associated) appear to be ideal targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":" ","pages":"205-214"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: CO2 Laser (CO2L) technology deployable through flexible endoscopes now allows for their use throughout the airway, although published data are limited.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of CO2L bronchoscopic procedures, excluding glottic and subglottic interventions. Procedural success was defined as >50% visual reduction in airway obstruction in the area treated or resolution of the procedural indication.

Results: Seventy-two procedures were performed on 36 patients. Nonmalignant indications comprised 66%: stent-associated granulation tissue (28%), granulomatosis with polyangiitis lesions (23%), and lung transplant-related granulation tissue (16%) were the most common. Bronchoscopic access was flexible only in 81% and primarily rigid (combined with flexible) in 18%. The site of intervention was the trachea at 19%, the mainstem at 56%, and lobar/segmental airways at 45%. Procedural success was 89%. CO2L was used exclusively in 19%; in 81%, additional techniques were required, most commonly balloon dilation (59%), cryo-debulking (23%), and rigid dilation (16%). Malignant indications had a nonsignificant trend toward requiring adjuvant techniques ( P =0.05). Seventy-six percent of the patients required more than 1 procedure. CO2L exclusive cases had no statistically different needs for subsequent therapeutic bronchoscopies ( P =0.10) or time to reintervention (109 vs. 41 days, P =0.07), and reintervention-free survival was similar ( P =0.10) and difficult to predict. The complication rate attributable to CO2L was 2.7%.

Conclusion: CO2L is a safe and useful tool when precise cutting and vaporization are desired. Its use in multi-modality approaches has high levels of success in adequately selected lesions, adding an ablative potential to dilation techniques. Vasculitis-associated scars/webs and granulation tissue (including stent-associated) appear to be ideal targets.

治疗性支气管镜中的柔性二氧化碳激光:一家三级医疗中心的初步经验。
背景:二氧化碳激光(CO2L)技术可通过柔性内窥镜进行部署,目前可用于整个气道,但已发表的数据有限:方法:对 CO2L 支气管镜手术进行回顾性分析,不包括声门和声门下干预。手术成功的定义是治疗区域的气道阻塞目视减小>50%或手术适应症得到缓解:结果:共为 36 名患者实施了 72 例手术。非恶性适应症占 66%:最常见的是支架相关肉芽组织(28%)、肉芽肿伴多血管炎病变(23%)和肺移植相关肉芽组织(16%)。81%的支气管镜取道为柔性取道,18%主要为刚性取道(结合柔性取道)。介入部位为气管的占 19%,主干的占 56%,叶状/片状气道的占 45%。手术成功率为 89%。19%的患者只使用了 CO2L;81%的患者需要使用其他技术,其中最常见的是球囊扩张术(59%)、低温分解术(23%)和硬性扩张术(16%)。恶性适应症需要辅助技术的趋势并不明显(P=0.05)。76%的患者需要进行一次以上的手术。不使用 CO2L 的病例对后续治疗性支气管镜检查的需求(P=0.10)或再次介入治疗的时间(109 对 41 天,P=0.07)没有统计学差异,无再次介入治疗生存率相似(P=0.10),且难以预测。CO2L导致的并发症发生率为2.7%:结论:当需要精确切割和汽化时,CO2L是一种安全有用的工具。结论:当需要精确切割和汽化时,CO2L 是一种安全有用的工具。在多模式方法中使用 CO2L,在充分选择病灶的情况下成功率很高,为扩张技术增添了消融潜力。脉管炎相关疤痕/网状组织和肉芽组织(包括支架相关组织)似乎是理想的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信