Deep learning approach using SPECT-to-PET translation for attenuation correction in CT-less myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Masateru Kawakubo, Michinobu Nagao, Yoko Kaimoto, Risako Nakao, Atsushi Yamamoto, Hiroshi Kawasaki, Takafumi Iwaguchi, Yuka Matsuo, Koichiro Kaneko, Akiko Sakai, Shuji Sakai
{"title":"Deep learning approach using SPECT-to-PET translation for attenuation correction in CT-less myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging","authors":"Masateru Kawakubo,&nbsp;Michinobu Nagao,&nbsp;Yoko Kaimoto,&nbsp;Risako Nakao,&nbsp;Atsushi Yamamoto,&nbsp;Hiroshi Kawasaki,&nbsp;Takafumi Iwaguchi,&nbsp;Yuka Matsuo,&nbsp;Koichiro Kaneko,&nbsp;Akiko Sakai,&nbsp;Shuji Sakai","doi":"10.1007/s12149-023-01889-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Deep learning approaches have attracted attention for improving the scoring accuracy in computed tomography-less single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). In this study, we proposed a novel deep learning approach referring to positron emission tomography (PET). The aims of this study were to analyze the agreement of representative voxel values and perfusion scores of SPECT-to-PET translation model-generated SPECT (SPECT<sub>SPT</sub>) against PET in 17 segments according to the American Heart Association (AHA).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study evaluated the patient-to-patient stress, resting SPECT, and PET datasets of 71 patients. The SPECT<sub>SPT</sub> generation model was trained (stress: 979 image pairs, rest: 987 image pairs) and validated (stress: 421 image pairs, rest: 425 image pairs) using 31 cases of SPECT and PET image pairs using an image-to-image translation network. Forty of 71 cases of left ventricular base-to-apex short-axis images were translated to SPECT<sub>SPT</sub> in the stress and resting state (stress: 1830 images, rest: 1856 images). Representative voxel values of SPECT and SPECT<sub>SPT</sub> in the 17 AHA segments against PET were compared. The stress, resting, and difference scores of 40 cases of SPECT and SPECT<sub>SPT</sub> were also compared in each of the 17 segments.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>For AHA 17-segment-wise analysis, stressed SPECT but not SPECT<sub>SPT</sub> voxel values showed significant error from PET at basal anterior regions (segments #1, #6), and at mid inferoseptal regions (segments #8, #9, and #10). SPECT, but not SPECT<sub>SPT</sub>, voxel values at resting state showed significant error at basal anterior regions (segments #1, #2, and #6), and at mid inferior regions (segments #8, #9, and #11). Significant SPECT overscoring was observed against PET in basal-to-apical inferior regions (segments #4, #10, and #15) during stress. No significant overscoring was observed in SPECTSPT at stress, and only moderate over and underscoring in the basal inferior region (segment #4) was found in the resting and difference states.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our PET-supervised deep learning model is a new approach to correct well-known inferior wall attenuation in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. As standalone SPECT systems are used worldwide, the SPECT<sub>SPT</sub> generation model may be applied as a low-cost and practical clinical tool that provides powerful auxiliary information for the diagnosis of myocardial blood flow.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8007,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10884131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12149-023-01889-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Deep learning approaches have attracted attention for improving the scoring accuracy in computed tomography-less single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). In this study, we proposed a novel deep learning approach referring to positron emission tomography (PET). The aims of this study were to analyze the agreement of representative voxel values and perfusion scores of SPECT-to-PET translation model-generated SPECT (SPECTSPT) against PET in 17 segments according to the American Heart Association (AHA).

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated the patient-to-patient stress, resting SPECT, and PET datasets of 71 patients. The SPECTSPT generation model was trained (stress: 979 image pairs, rest: 987 image pairs) and validated (stress: 421 image pairs, rest: 425 image pairs) using 31 cases of SPECT and PET image pairs using an image-to-image translation network. Forty of 71 cases of left ventricular base-to-apex short-axis images were translated to SPECTSPT in the stress and resting state (stress: 1830 images, rest: 1856 images). Representative voxel values of SPECT and SPECTSPT in the 17 AHA segments against PET were compared. The stress, resting, and difference scores of 40 cases of SPECT and SPECTSPT were also compared in each of the 17 segments.

Results

For AHA 17-segment-wise analysis, stressed SPECT but not SPECTSPT voxel values showed significant error from PET at basal anterior regions (segments #1, #6), and at mid inferoseptal regions (segments #8, #9, and #10). SPECT, but not SPECTSPT, voxel values at resting state showed significant error at basal anterior regions (segments #1, #2, and #6), and at mid inferior regions (segments #8, #9, and #11). Significant SPECT overscoring was observed against PET in basal-to-apical inferior regions (segments #4, #10, and #15) during stress. No significant overscoring was observed in SPECTSPT at stress, and only moderate over and underscoring in the basal inferior region (segment #4) was found in the resting and difference states.

Conclusions

Our PET-supervised deep learning model is a new approach to correct well-known inferior wall attenuation in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. As standalone SPECT systems are used worldwide, the SPECTSPT generation model may be applied as a low-cost and practical clinical tool that provides powerful auxiliary information for the diagnosis of myocardial blood flow.

Abstract Image

在无 CT 心肌灌注 SPECT 成像中使用 SPECT 到 PET 转换的深度学习方法进行衰减校正。
目的:深度学习方法在提高无计算机断层扫描单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的评分准确性方面备受关注。在本研究中,我们提出了一种适用于正电子发射计算机断层扫描(PET)的新型深度学习方法。本研究的目的是根据美国心脏协会(AHA)的标准,分析 SPECT 到 PET 转换模型生成的 SPECT(SPECTSPT)与 PET 在 17 个节段的代表性体素值和灌注评分的一致性:这项回顾性研究评估了 71 名患者的患者间压力、静息 SPECT 和 PET 数据集。利用图像到图像转换网络,使用 31 例 SPECT 和 PET 图像对对 SPECTSPT 生成模型进行了训练(压力:979 个图像对,静息:987 个图像对)和验证(压力:421 个图像对,静息:425 个图像对)。在应激和静息状态下,将 71 例左心室基底至心尖短轴图像中的 40 例转换为 SPECTSPT(应激:1830 幅图像,静息:1856 幅图像)。比较了 SPECT 和 SPECTSPT 在 17 个 AHA 节段的代表性体素值与 PET 的比较。此外,还比较了 17 个节段中每个节段 40 例 SPECT 和 SPECTSPT 的应激、静息和差异评分:就 AHA 17 节段分析而言,在基底前部区域(1 号、6 号节段)和中段下部区域(8 号、9 号和 10 号节段),应力 SPECT 的体素值与 PET 存在显著误差,而 SPECTSPT 的体素值与 PET 无显著误差。静息状态下的 SPECT(而非 SPECTSPT)体素值在基底前区(1 号、2 号和 6 号段)和中下区(8 号、9 号和 11 号段)显示出显著误差。在应激状态下,基底至尖端下部区域(4 号、10 号和 15 号段)的 SPECT 与 PET 相比出现了明显的过度扫描。在应激状态下,SPECTSPT未观察到明显的过度扫描,在静息和差异状态下,基底下部区域(4号段)仅发现中度过度扫描和不足扫描:我们的 PET 监督深度学习模型是纠正 SPECT 心肌灌注成像中众所周知的下壁衰减的一种新方法。随着独立SPECT系统在全球范围内的应用,SPECTSPT生成模型可作为一种低成本、实用的临床工具,为心肌血流诊断提供强大的辅助信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Medicine is an official journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. It develops the appropriate application of radioactive substances and stable nuclides in the field of medicine. The journal promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in nuclear medicine and includes the medical application of radionuclides and related subjects. It presents original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信