Does biochar improve nitrogen use efficiency in maize?

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Giovani Preza Fontes, Kristin D. Greer, Cameron M. Pittelkow
{"title":"Does biochar improve nitrogen use efficiency in maize?","authors":"Giovani Preza Fontes,&nbsp;Kristin D. Greer,&nbsp;Cameron M. Pittelkow","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.13122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biochar is promoted as a means of improving soil fertility. Yet, few experiments have investigated its potential to improve nitrogen (N) use efficiency for high-yielding maize production in the U.S. Midwest. We tested the hypothesis that biochar application increases inorganic soil N availability during maize growth, leading to higher grain yields and N recovery efficiency while reducing the risk of N leaching following harvest. Four N fertilizer rates (0, 90, 179, and 269 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> as urea ammonium nitrate [UAN] solution) were applied with or without biochar (10 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) before planting in a two-year field study. Inorganic soil N concentration was measured during the growing season (0–15 cm), and deep soil cores were obtained following harvest (0–90 cm). Results show that biochar did not affect maize yield, crop N uptake, or N recovery efficiency (by the difference method) across N rates, and there was no biochar by N rate interaction. While biochar lowered soil inorganic N concentrations on several sampling dates, this did not translate into seasonal differences in cumulative soil N availability, although grain yields in the unfertilized control were ~10% lower with biochar, suggesting net N immobilization. Biochar partially reduced the risk of N leaching following harvest by decreasing soil N concentrations at 30–60 cm, but mean concentrations for 0–90 cm were not different. Compared to previous work highlighting the benefits of biochar in arid climates with low soil fertility, we found no evidence of increased crop yield, NRE, or reduced risk of N leaching on Mollisols in a temperate climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13122","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biochar is promoted as a means of improving soil fertility. Yet, few experiments have investigated its potential to improve nitrogen (N) use efficiency for high-yielding maize production in the U.S. Midwest. We tested the hypothesis that biochar application increases inorganic soil N availability during maize growth, leading to higher grain yields and N recovery efficiency while reducing the risk of N leaching following harvest. Four N fertilizer rates (0, 90, 179, and 269 kg ha−1 as urea ammonium nitrate [UAN] solution) were applied with or without biochar (10 Mg ha−1) before planting in a two-year field study. Inorganic soil N concentration was measured during the growing season (0–15 cm), and deep soil cores were obtained following harvest (0–90 cm). Results show that biochar did not affect maize yield, crop N uptake, or N recovery efficiency (by the difference method) across N rates, and there was no biochar by N rate interaction. While biochar lowered soil inorganic N concentrations on several sampling dates, this did not translate into seasonal differences in cumulative soil N availability, although grain yields in the unfertilized control were ~10% lower with biochar, suggesting net N immobilization. Biochar partially reduced the risk of N leaching following harvest by decreasing soil N concentrations at 30–60 cm, but mean concentrations for 0–90 cm were not different. Compared to previous work highlighting the benefits of biochar in arid climates with low soil fertility, we found no evidence of increased crop yield, NRE, or reduced risk of N leaching on Mollisols in a temperate climate.

Abstract Image

生物炭能否提高玉米的氮利用效率?
生物炭作为提高土壤肥力的一种手段得到了推广。然而,在美国中西部地区,很少有实验研究生物炭提高玉米高产生产中氮(N)利用效率的潜力。我们测试了这样一个假设:施用生物炭可在玉米生长期间提高土壤无机氮的可用性,从而提高谷物产量和氮的回收效率,同时降低收获后氮浸出的风险。在一项为期两年的田间研究中,我们在玉米播种前施用了四种氮肥(0、90、179 和 269 kg ha-1 尿素硝酸铵 [UAN] 溶液),同时施用或不施用生物炭(10 Mg ha-1)。在生长季节(0-15 厘米)测量了土壤中的无机氮浓度,并在收获后(0-90 厘米)采集了深层土芯。结果表明,在不同的氮含量下,生物炭不会影响玉米产量、作物对氮的吸收或氮的回收效率(采用差值法),而且生物炭与氮含量之间不存在交互作用。虽然生物炭降低了几个取样日期的土壤无机氮浓度,但这并没有转化为累积土壤氮可用性的季节性差异,尽管未施肥对照的谷物产量在生物炭的作用下降低了约 10%,这表明净氮固定化。生物炭降低了 30-60 厘米处的土壤氮浓度,从而部分降低了收获后氮沥滤的风险,但 0-90 厘米处的平均浓度并无差异。以前的研究强调了生物炭在土壤肥力低的干旱气候条件下的益处,与此相比,我们在温带气候条件下的 Mollisols 上没有发现提高作物产量、增加净氮固定率或降低氮沥滤风险的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信