Carbon dioxide fluxes and soil carbon storage in relation to long-term grazing and no grazing in Icelandic semi-natural grasslands

IF 2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Anna Gudrun Thorhallsdottir, Jon Gudmundsson
{"title":"Carbon dioxide fluxes and soil carbon storage in relation to long-term grazing and no grazing in Icelandic semi-natural grasslands","authors":"Anna Gudrun Thorhallsdottir,&nbsp;Jon Gudmundsson","doi":"10.1111/avsc.12757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Question</h3>\n \n <p>What is the effect of long-term grazing and no grazing (NG) on carbon dioxide flux and soil carbon storage in Icelandic semi-natural grasslands.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Three farms, with known history of land use, in W Iceland.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>On each farm, we located an intensively and an extensively grazed site, which both had been constantly grazed for centuries, and a parallel site with no grazing for over 50 years. We measured net ecosystem exchange (NEE), ecosystem respiration and normalized difference vegetation index on a regular basis over the growing season. Samples were taken from 60 cm deep soil profiles for analysis of soil organic carbon (SOC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The grazed sites showed significantly more negative NEE than the NG sites, indicating more carbon dioxide uptake on the grazed sites compared to the NG sites. The normalized difference vegetation index was also significantly higher on the grazed sites. On all farms, the total SOC content was higher in the grazed sites than in the parallel NG sites.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The study indicates that cessation of grazing decreases productivity and carbon dioxide uptake in a semi-natural grassland in Iceland, as well as SOC content in the soil. Historically, all the NG sites in the study had the same grazing history as the continuously grazed sites until grazing exclusion. The measured lower SOC on the NG sites seems to indicate that, without grazing, SOC is lost with time and/or grazing is needed to maintain SOC in these grasslands.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55494,"journal":{"name":"Applied Vegetation Science","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/avsc.12757","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12757","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Question

What is the effect of long-term grazing and no grazing (NG) on carbon dioxide flux and soil carbon storage in Icelandic semi-natural grasslands.

Location

Three farms, with known history of land use, in W Iceland.

Methods

On each farm, we located an intensively and an extensively grazed site, which both had been constantly grazed for centuries, and a parallel site with no grazing for over 50 years. We measured net ecosystem exchange (NEE), ecosystem respiration and normalized difference vegetation index on a regular basis over the growing season. Samples were taken from 60 cm deep soil profiles for analysis of soil organic carbon (SOC).

Results

The grazed sites showed significantly more negative NEE than the NG sites, indicating more carbon dioxide uptake on the grazed sites compared to the NG sites. The normalized difference vegetation index was also significantly higher on the grazed sites. On all farms, the total SOC content was higher in the grazed sites than in the parallel NG sites.

Conclusions

The study indicates that cessation of grazing decreases productivity and carbon dioxide uptake in a semi-natural grassland in Iceland, as well as SOC content in the soil. Historically, all the NG sites in the study had the same grazing history as the continuously grazed sites until grazing exclusion. The measured lower SOC on the NG sites seems to indicate that, without grazing, SOC is lost with time and/or grazing is needed to maintain SOC in these grasslands.

Abstract Image

与冰岛半天然草地长期放牧和不放牧有关的二氧化碳通量和土壤碳储量
问题 长期放牧和不放牧(NG)对冰岛半天然草地的二氧化碳通量和土壤碳储量有何影响。 地点 冰岛西部三个已知土地使用历史的农场。 方法 在每个农场中,我们都找到了一个密集放牧地和一个广泛放牧地,这两个放牧地都已持续放牧了几个世纪,同时还找到了一个超过 50 年未放牧的地方。我们在生长季节定期测量净生态系统交换量(NEE)、生态系统呼吸量和归一化差异植被指数。从 60 厘米深的土壤剖面取样分析土壤有机碳(SOC)。 结果 与 NG 点相比,放牧点的负 NEE 明显更高,这表明与 NG 点相比,放牧点吸收了更多的二氧化碳。放牧地的归一化差异植被指数也明显较高。在所有农场,放牧地的总 SOC 含量均高于平行的 NG 地。 结论 研究表明,停止放牧会降低冰岛半自然草地的生产力和二氧化碳吸收率,以及土壤中的 SOC 含量。从历史上看,研究中的所有 NG 地点在禁牧前的放牧历史与持续放牧地点相同。在 NG 地点测得的较低 SOC 似乎表明,在没有放牧的情况下,SOC 会随着时间的推移而流失,并且/或者需要放牧来维持这些草地的 SOC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Vegetation Science
Applied Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Vegetation Science focuses on community-level topics relevant to human interaction with vegetation, including global change, nature conservation, nature management, restoration of plant communities and of natural habitats, and the planning of semi-natural and urban landscapes. Vegetation survey, modelling and remote-sensing applications are welcome. Papers on vegetation science which do not fit to this scope (do not have an applied aspect and are not vegetation survey) should be directed to our associate journal, the Journal of Vegetation Science. Both journals publish papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信