Evaluation of two colorimetric microplate microtiter tests for susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first-line antituberculosis drugs.

IF 1.6 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Gülnur Tarhan, Sadik Akgün, Mehmet Bilgin, Sami Akbulak
{"title":"Evaluation of two colorimetric microplate microtiter tests for susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> to first-line antituberculosis drugs.","authors":"Gülnur Tarhan, Sadik Akgün, Mehmet Bilgin, Sami Akbulak","doi":"10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_130_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-resistance tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most important global public health problems. Accurate and rapid drug-susceptibility testing is critical for the effective treatment of TB patients. Various colorimetric methods are used for anti-TB drug-susceptibility testing (DST) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination. This study was conducted to evaluate the resazurin microtiter assay (REMA) and malachite green decolorization assay (MGDA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 65 Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated from patients with suspected TB using REMA and malachite green microtiter assay methods were tested against streptomycin (SM), isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), and ethambutol (ETB). The Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube 960 DST method was accepted as the gold standard in the evaluation of test results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of REMA and MGDA tests was found to be 87.5% and 62.5% for INH, respectively. RIF and SM sensitivity for both tests was 100%. While ETB sensitivity was 81.8 for the REMA test, this rate was 60% for the MGDA test. Specificity of both tests varied between 92.5% and 98.2% according to the drug types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>REMA and MGDA are a simple, rapid, and low cost. They can be used as an alternative test for drug-susceptibility testing and MIC determination. Extensive studies and standardization are needed for the routine use of both tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":14133,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","volume":"12 4","pages":"412-415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mycobacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_130_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug-resistance tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most important global public health problems. Accurate and rapid drug-susceptibility testing is critical for the effective treatment of TB patients. Various colorimetric methods are used for anti-TB drug-susceptibility testing (DST) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination. This study was conducted to evaluate the resazurin microtiter assay (REMA) and malachite green decolorization assay (MGDA).

Methods: A total of 65 Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated from patients with suspected TB using REMA and malachite green microtiter assay methods were tested against streptomycin (SM), isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), and ethambutol (ETB). The Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube 960 DST method was accepted as the gold standard in the evaluation of test results.

Results: The sensitivity of REMA and MGDA tests was found to be 87.5% and 62.5% for INH, respectively. RIF and SM sensitivity for both tests was 100%. While ETB sensitivity was 81.8 for the REMA test, this rate was 60% for the MGDA test. Specificity of both tests varied between 92.5% and 98.2% according to the drug types.

Conclusion: REMA and MGDA are a simple, rapid, and low cost. They can be used as an alternative test for drug-susceptibility testing and MIC determination. Extensive studies and standardization are needed for the routine use of both tests.

评估用于检测临床分离的结核分枝杆菌对一线抗结核药物敏感性的两种比色微孔板微滴试验。
背景:耐药性结核病(TB)是全球最重要的公共卫生问题之一。准确、快速的药敏试验对于有效治疗结核病患者至关重要。抗结核药敏试验(DST)和最低抑菌浓度(MIC)测定采用了多种比色法。本研究对瑞沙唑林微量滴定法(REMA)和孔雀石绿脱色法(MGDA)进行了评估:方法:使用 REMA 和孔雀石绿显微滴定法对从疑似肺结核患者中分离出的 65 株结核分枝杆菌进行了链霉素 (SM)、异烟肼 (INH)、利福平 (RIF) 和乙胺丁醇 (ETB) 试验。分枝杆菌生长指示剂管 960 DST 法被认为是评价检测结果的金标准:结果:REMA 和 MGDA 检测对 INH 的灵敏度分别为 87.5% 和 62.5%。RIF和SM检测的灵敏度均为100%。REMA 检验对 ETB 的敏感性为 81.8%,而 MGDA 检验的敏感性为 60%。根据药物类型的不同,两种检测方法的特异性介于 92.5% 和 98.2% 之间:结论:REMA 和 MGDA 是一种简单、快速、低成本的检测方法。结论:REMA 和 MGDA 简单、快速、成本低,可作为药物敏感性检测和 MIC 测定的替代检测方法。常规使用这两种检测方法需要进行广泛的研究和标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信