Scavenging with invasive species

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Thomas Newsome, Rhys Cairncross, Calum X. Cunningham, Emma E. Spencer, Philip S. Barton, William J. Ripple, Aaron J. Wirsing
{"title":"Scavenging with invasive species","authors":"Thomas Newsome,&nbsp;Rhys Cairncross,&nbsp;Calum X. Cunningham,&nbsp;Emma E. Spencer,&nbsp;Philip S. Barton,&nbsp;William J. Ripple,&nbsp;Aaron J. Wirsing","doi":"10.1111/brv.13035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Carrion acts as a hotspot of animal activity within many ecosystems globally, attracting scavengers that rely on this food source. However, many scavengers are invasive species whose impacts on scavenging food webs and ecosystem processes linked to decomposition are poorly understood. Here, we use Australia as a case study to review the extent of scavenging by invasive species that have colonised the continent since European settlement, identify the factors that influence their use of carcasses, and highlight the lesser-known ecological effects of invasive scavengers. From 44 published studies we identified six invasive species from 48 vertebrates and four main groups of arthropods (beetles, flies, ants and wasps) that scavenge. Invasive red foxes (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>), domestic dogs (<i>Canis familiaris</i>), feral pigs (<i>Sus scrofa</i>), black rats (<i>Rattus rattus</i>) and feral cats (<i>Felis catus</i>) were ranked as highly common vertebrate scavengers. Invasive European wasps (<i>Vespula germanica</i>) are also common scavengers where they occur. We found that the diversity of native vertebrate scavengers is lower when the proportion of invasive scavengers is higher. We highlight that the presence of large (apex) native vertebrate scavengers can decrease rates of scavenging by invasive species, but that invasive scavengers can monopolise carcass resources, outcompete native scavengers, predate other species around carcass resources and even facilitate invasion meltdowns that affect other species and ecological processes including altered decomposition rates and nutrient cycling. Such effects are likely to be widespread where invasive scavengers occur and suggest a need to determine whether excessive or readily available carcass loads are facilitating or exacerbating the impacts of invasive species on ecosystems globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/brv.13035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carrion acts as a hotspot of animal activity within many ecosystems globally, attracting scavengers that rely on this food source. However, many scavengers are invasive species whose impacts on scavenging food webs and ecosystem processes linked to decomposition are poorly understood. Here, we use Australia as a case study to review the extent of scavenging by invasive species that have colonised the continent since European settlement, identify the factors that influence their use of carcasses, and highlight the lesser-known ecological effects of invasive scavengers. From 44 published studies we identified six invasive species from 48 vertebrates and four main groups of arthropods (beetles, flies, ants and wasps) that scavenge. Invasive red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), domestic dogs (Canis familiaris), feral pigs (Sus scrofa), black rats (Rattus rattus) and feral cats (Felis catus) were ranked as highly common vertebrate scavengers. Invasive European wasps (Vespula germanica) are also common scavengers where they occur. We found that the diversity of native vertebrate scavengers is lower when the proportion of invasive scavengers is higher. We highlight that the presence of large (apex) native vertebrate scavengers can decrease rates of scavenging by invasive species, but that invasive scavengers can monopolise carcass resources, outcompete native scavengers, predate other species around carcass resources and even facilitate invasion meltdowns that affect other species and ecological processes including altered decomposition rates and nutrient cycling. Such effects are likely to be widespread where invasive scavengers occur and suggest a need to determine whether excessive or readily available carcass loads are facilitating or exacerbating the impacts of invasive species on ecosystems globally.

Abstract Image

与入侵物种一起清扫。
腐肉是全球许多生态系统中动物活动的热点,吸引着依赖这种食物来源的食腐动物。然而,许多食腐动物都是入侵物种,它们对食腐食物网和与分解相关的生态系统过程的影响鲜为人知。在这里,我们以澳大利亚为案例,回顾了自欧洲人定居以来殖民到澳大利亚大陆的入侵物种的食腐程度,确定了影响它们利用尸体的因素,并强调了入侵食腐动物鲜为人知的生态效应。从 44 项已发表的研究中,我们从 48 种脊椎动物和四大类节肢动物(甲虫、苍蝇、蚂蚁和黄蜂)中确定了 6 种会清道夫的入侵物种。入侵的红狐(Vulpes vulpes)、家犬(Canis familiaris)、野猪(Sus scrofa)、黑鼠(Rattus rattus)和野猫(Felis catus)被列为非常常见的脊椎动物食腐动物。入侵的欧洲黄蜂(Vespula germanica)也是它们出现的地方常见的食腐动物。我们发现,当入侵食腐动物比例较高时,本地脊椎食腐动物的多样性就会降低。我们强调,大型(顶端)本地脊椎动物食腐动物的存在可以降低入侵物种的食腐率,但入侵食腐动物可以垄断尸体资源,超越本地食腐动物,捕食尸体资源周围的其他物种,甚至促进入侵崩溃,从而影响其他物种和生态过程,包括改变分解率和营养循环。在有入侵食腐动物出现的地方,这种影响可能很普遍,这表明有必要确定过多或容易获得的尸体负荷是否会促进或加剧入侵物种对全球生态系统的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信