Distinct, direct and climate-mediated environmental controls on global particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon storage

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Paige M. Hansen, Rebecca Even, Alison E. King, Jocelyn Lavallee, Meagan Schipanski, M. Francesca Cotrufo
{"title":"Distinct, direct and climate-mediated environmental controls on global particulate and mineral-associated organic carbon storage","authors":"Paige M. Hansen,&nbsp;Rebecca Even,&nbsp;Alison E. King,&nbsp;Jocelyn Lavallee,&nbsp;Meagan Schipanski,&nbsp;M. Francesca Cotrufo","doi":"10.1111/gcb.17080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Identifying controls on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, and where SOC is most vulnerable to loss, are essential to managing soils for both climate change mitigation and global food security. However, we currently lack a comprehensive understanding of the global drivers of SOC storage, especially with regards to particulate (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC). To better understand hierarchical controls on POC and MAOC, we applied path analyses to SOC fractions, climate (i.e., mean annual temperature [MAT] and mean annual precipitation minus potential evapotranspiration [MAP-PET]), carbon (C) input (i.e., net primary production [NPP]), and soil property data synthesized from 72 published studies, along with data we generated from the National Ecological Observatory Network soil pits (<i>n</i> = 901 total observations). To assess the utility of investigating POC and MAOC separately in understanding SOC storage controls, we then compared these results with another path analysis predicting bulk SOC storage. We found that POC storage is negatively related to MAT and soil pH, while MAOC storage is positively related to NPP and MAP-PET, but negatively related to soil % sand. Our path analysis predicting bulk SOC revealed similar trends but explained less variation in C storage than our POC and MAOC analyses. Given that temperature and pH impose constraints on microbial decomposition, this indicates that POC is primarily controlled by SOC loss processes. In contrast, strong relationships with variables related to plant productivity constraints, moisture, and mineral surface availability for sorption indicate that MAOC is primarily controlled by climate-driven variations in C inputs to the soil, as well as C stabilization mechanisms. Altogether, these results demonstrate that global POC and MAOC storage are controlled by separate environmental variables, further justifying the need to quantify and model these C fractions separately to assess and forecast the responses of SOC storage to global change.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17080","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying controls on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, and where SOC is most vulnerable to loss, are essential to managing soils for both climate change mitigation and global food security. However, we currently lack a comprehensive understanding of the global drivers of SOC storage, especially with regards to particulate (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC). To better understand hierarchical controls on POC and MAOC, we applied path analyses to SOC fractions, climate (i.e., mean annual temperature [MAT] and mean annual precipitation minus potential evapotranspiration [MAP-PET]), carbon (C) input (i.e., net primary production [NPP]), and soil property data synthesized from 72 published studies, along with data we generated from the National Ecological Observatory Network soil pits (n = 901 total observations). To assess the utility of investigating POC and MAOC separately in understanding SOC storage controls, we then compared these results with another path analysis predicting bulk SOC storage. We found that POC storage is negatively related to MAT and soil pH, while MAOC storage is positively related to NPP and MAP-PET, but negatively related to soil % sand. Our path analysis predicting bulk SOC revealed similar trends but explained less variation in C storage than our POC and MAOC analyses. Given that temperature and pH impose constraints on microbial decomposition, this indicates that POC is primarily controlled by SOC loss processes. In contrast, strong relationships with variables related to plant productivity constraints, moisture, and mineral surface availability for sorption indicate that MAOC is primarily controlled by climate-driven variations in C inputs to the soil, as well as C stabilization mechanisms. Altogether, these results demonstrate that global POC and MAOC storage are controlled by separate environmental variables, further justifying the need to quantify and model these C fractions separately to assess and forecast the responses of SOC storage to global change.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对全球颗粒物和矿物相关有机碳储存的不同、直接和气候介导的环境控制
确定对土壤有机碳(SOC)储存的控制以及 SOC 最容易流失的地方,对于为减缓气候变化和全球粮食安全而管理土壤至关重要。然而,我们目前对全球土壤有机碳储存的驱动因素缺乏全面了解,尤其是颗粒有机碳(POC)和矿物相关有机碳(MAOC)。为了更好地理解对 POC 和 MAOC 的分级控制,我们对 SOC 分数、气候(即年平均气温 [MAT] 和年平均降水量减去潜在蒸散量 [MAP-PET])、碳(C)输入(即净初级生产力 [NPP])和土壤属性数据进行了路径分析,这些数据综合自 72 项已发表的研究,以及我们从国家生态观测网土壤坑中获得的数据(n = 901 个观测数据)。为了评估分别研究 POC 和 MAOC 对了解 SOC 储量控制的作用,我们将这些结果与另一项预测大量 SOC 储量的路径分析进行了比较。我们发现,POC 储量与 MAT 和土壤 pH 值呈负相关,而 MAOC 储量与 NPP 和 MAP-PET 呈正相关,但与土壤含沙量呈负相关。我们对大量 SOC 的预测路径分析显示了类似的趋势,但与 POC 和 MAOC 分析相比,对 C 储存量变化的解释较少。鉴于温度和 pH 值对微生物分解的限制,这表明 POC 主要受 SOC 损失过程的控制。与此相反,与植物生产力限制、水分和矿物表面吸附可用性相关的变量之间的密切关系表明,MAOC 主要受控于土壤中 C 输入量的气候驱动变化以及 C 稳定机制。总之,这些结果表明,全球 POC 和 MAOC 的储存分别受不同环境变量的控制,这进一步证明有必要对这些 C 部分分别进行量化和建模,以评估和预测 SOC 储存对全球变化的响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信