Limited psychological and social effects of lifetime cannabis use frequency: Evidence from a 30-year community study of 4,078 twins.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Stephanie Zellers, Jordan Alexander, Jarrod M Ellingson, Jonathan D Schaefer, Robin P Corley, William Iacono, John K Hewitt, Christian J Hopfer, Matt K McGue, Scott Vrieze
{"title":"Limited psychological and social effects of lifetime cannabis use frequency: Evidence from a 30-year community study of 4,078 twins.","authors":"Stephanie Zellers, Jordan Alexander, Jarrod M Ellingson, Jonathan D Schaefer, Robin P Corley, William Iacono, John K Hewitt, Christian J Hopfer, Matt K McGue, Scott Vrieze","doi":"10.1037/abn0000867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cannabis use is associated with outcomes like income, legal problems, and psychopathology. This finding rests largely on correlational research designs, which rely at best on statistical controls for confounding. Here, we control for unmeasured confounders using a longitudinal study of twins.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a sample of 4,078 American adult twins first assessed decades ago, we used cotwin control mixed effects models to evaluate the effect of lifetime average frequency of cannabis consumption measured on substance use, psychiatric, and psychosocial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, participants had a lifetime cannabis frequency of about one to two times per month, across adolescence and adulthood. As expected, in individual-level analyses, cannabis use was significantly associated with almost all outcomes in the expected directions. However, when comparing each twin to their cotwin, which inherently controls for shared genes and environments, we observed within-pair differences consistent with possible causality in three of the 22 assessed outcomes: cannabis use disorder symptoms (βW-Pooled = .15, SE = .02, p = 1.7 × 10-22), frequency of tobacco use (βW-Pooled = .06, SE = .01, p = 1.2 × 10-5), and illicit drug involvement (βW-Pooled = .06, SE = .02, p = 1.2 × 10-4). Covariate specification curve analyses indicated that within-pair effects on tobacco and illicit drug use, but not cannabis use disorder, attenuated substantially when covarying for lifetime alcohol and tobacco use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cotwin control results suggest that more frequent cannabis use causes small increases in cannabis use disorder symptoms, approximately 1.3 symptoms when going from a once-a-year use to daily use. For other outcomes, our results are more consistent with familial confounding, at least in this community population of twins. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":"133 1","pages":"115-128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10751959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cannabis use is associated with outcomes like income, legal problems, and psychopathology. This finding rests largely on correlational research designs, which rely at best on statistical controls for confounding. Here, we control for unmeasured confounders using a longitudinal study of twins.

Method: In a sample of 4,078 American adult twins first assessed decades ago, we used cotwin control mixed effects models to evaluate the effect of lifetime average frequency of cannabis consumption measured on substance use, psychiatric, and psychosocial outcomes.

Results: On average, participants had a lifetime cannabis frequency of about one to two times per month, across adolescence and adulthood. As expected, in individual-level analyses, cannabis use was significantly associated with almost all outcomes in the expected directions. However, when comparing each twin to their cotwin, which inherently controls for shared genes and environments, we observed within-pair differences consistent with possible causality in three of the 22 assessed outcomes: cannabis use disorder symptoms (βW-Pooled = .15, SE = .02, p = 1.7 × 10-22), frequency of tobacco use (βW-Pooled = .06, SE = .01, p = 1.2 × 10-5), and illicit drug involvement (βW-Pooled = .06, SE = .02, p = 1.2 × 10-4). Covariate specification curve analyses indicated that within-pair effects on tobacco and illicit drug use, but not cannabis use disorder, attenuated substantially when covarying for lifetime alcohol and tobacco use.

Conclusions: The cotwin control results suggest that more frequent cannabis use causes small increases in cannabis use disorder symptoms, approximately 1.3 symptoms when going from a once-a-year use to daily use. For other outcomes, our results are more consistent with familial confounding, at least in this community population of twins. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

终生吸食大麻的频率对心理和社会的影响有限:对 4,078 对双胞胎长达 30 年的社区研究提供的证据。
背景:吸食大麻与收入、法律问题和精神病理学等结果相关。这一发现在很大程度上依赖于相关性研究设计,而这些研究设计充其量只是对混杂因素进行统计控制。在此,我们通过对双胞胎的纵向研究来控制未测量的混杂因素:方法:在几十年前首次评估的 4078 对美国成年双胞胎样本中,我们使用同卵双生对照混合效应模型来评估终生平均大麻消费频率对药物使用、精神和社会心理结果的影响:平均而言,在整个青春期和成年期,参与者一生中吸食大麻的频率约为每月一到两次。不出所料,在个人层面的分析中,大麻使用与几乎所有结果都有显著关联。然而,在将每个双胞胎与其同卵双胞胎进行比较时(这本身就控制了共同的基因和环境),我们观察到在 22 个评估结果中的三个结果存在可能的因果关系:大麻使用障碍症状(βW-Pooled = .15,SE = .02,p = 1.7 × 10-22)、吸烟频率(βW-Pooled = .06,SE = .01,p = 1.2 × 10-5)和非法药物参与(βW-Pooled = .06,SE = .02,p = 1.2 × 10-4)。共变参数规格曲线分析表明,当与终生酗酒和吸烟情况共变时,对烟草和非法药物使用的对内影响大大减弱,但对大麻使用障碍的影响却没有减弱:同卵双生对照结果表明,更频繁地使用大麻会导致大麻使用障碍症状的小幅增加,从每年使用一次到每天使用,大约会增加 1.3 个症状。至于其他结果,我们的结果更符合家族混杂因素,至少在这个社区的双胞胎群体中是如此。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信