Current Status of Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping of Hematolymphoid Neoplasms in Korea.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Annals of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-26 DOI:10.3343/alm.2023.0298
Mikyoung Park, Jihyang Lim, Ari Ahn, Eun-Jee Oh, Jaewoo Song, Kyeong-Hee Kim, Jin-Yeong Han, Hyun-Woo Choi, Joo-Heon Park, Kyung-Hwa Shin, Hyerim Kim, Miyoung Kim, Sang-Hyun Hwang, Hyun-Young Kim, Duck Cho, Eun-Suk Kang
{"title":"Current Status of Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping of Hematolymphoid Neoplasms in Korea.","authors":"Mikyoung Park, Jihyang Lim, Ari Ahn, Eun-Jee Oh, Jaewoo Song, Kyeong-Hee Kim, Jin-Yeong Han, Hyun-Woo Choi, Joo-Heon Park, Kyung-Hwa Shin, Hyerim Kim, Miyoung Kim, Sang-Hyun Hwang, Hyun-Young Kim, Duck Cho, Eun-Suk Kang","doi":"10.3343/alm.2023.0298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of hematolymphoid neoplasms (FCI-HLN) is essential for diagnosis, classification, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. FCI-HLN is typically performed using in-house protocols, raising the need for standardization. Therefore, we surveyed the current status of FCI-HLN in Korea to obtain fundamental data for quality improvement and standardization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight university hospitals actively conducting FCI-HLN participated in our survey. We analyzed responses to a questionnaire that included inquiries regarding test items, reagent antibodies (RAs), fluorophores, sample amounts (SAs), reagent antibody amounts (RAAs), acquisition cell number (ACN), isotype control (IC) usage, positive/negative criteria, and reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most hospitals used acute HLN, chronic HLN, plasma cell neoplasm (PCN), and MRD panels. The numbers of RAs were heterogeneous, with a maximum of 32, 26, 12, 14, and 10 antibodies used for acute HLN, chronic HLN, PCN, ALL-MRD, and multiple myeloma-MRD, respectively. The number of fluorophores ranged from 4 to 10. RAs, SAs, RAAs, and ACN were diverse. Most hospitals used a positive criterion of 20%, whereas one used 10% for acute and chronic HLN panels. Five hospitals used ICs for the negative criterion. Positive/negative assignments, percentages, and general opinions were commonly reported. In MRD reporting, the limit of detection and lower limit of quantification were included.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first comprehensive study on the current status of FCI-HLN in Korea, confirming the high heterogeneity and complexity of FCI-HLN practices. Standardization of FCI-HLN is urgently needed. The findings provide a reference for establishing standard FCI-HLN guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":8421,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"222-234"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10813832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.0298","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of hematolymphoid neoplasms (FCI-HLN) is essential for diagnosis, classification, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. FCI-HLN is typically performed using in-house protocols, raising the need for standardization. Therefore, we surveyed the current status of FCI-HLN in Korea to obtain fundamental data for quality improvement and standardization.

Methods: Eight university hospitals actively conducting FCI-HLN participated in our survey. We analyzed responses to a questionnaire that included inquiries regarding test items, reagent antibodies (RAs), fluorophores, sample amounts (SAs), reagent antibody amounts (RAAs), acquisition cell number (ACN), isotype control (IC) usage, positive/negative criteria, and reporting.

Results: Most hospitals used acute HLN, chronic HLN, plasma cell neoplasm (PCN), and MRD panels. The numbers of RAs were heterogeneous, with a maximum of 32, 26, 12, 14, and 10 antibodies used for acute HLN, chronic HLN, PCN, ALL-MRD, and multiple myeloma-MRD, respectively. The number of fluorophores ranged from 4 to 10. RAs, SAs, RAAs, and ACN were diverse. Most hospitals used a positive criterion of 20%, whereas one used 10% for acute and chronic HLN panels. Five hospitals used ICs for the negative criterion. Positive/negative assignments, percentages, and general opinions were commonly reported. In MRD reporting, the limit of detection and lower limit of quantification were included.

Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive study on the current status of FCI-HLN in Korea, confirming the high heterogeneity and complexity of FCI-HLN practices. Standardization of FCI-HLN is urgently needed. The findings provide a reference for establishing standard FCI-HLN guidelines.

韩国血淋巴肿瘤流式细胞免疫分型的现状。
背景:血淋巴肿瘤流式细胞免疫分型(FCI-HLN)对于诊断、分类和最小残留病(MRD)监测至关重要。FCI-HLN 通常采用内部方案进行,因此需要标准化。因此,我们对韩国 FCI-HLN 的现状进行了调查,以获得质量改进和标准化的基础数据:八家积极开展 FCI-HLN 的大学医院参与了我们的调查。我们对调查问卷的回复进行了分析,问卷内容包括测试项目、试剂抗体(RA)、荧光剂、样本量(SA)、试剂抗体量(RAA)、采集细胞数(ACN)、同型对照(IC)的使用、阳性/阴性标准和报告等:大多数医院使用急性 HLN、慢性 HLN、浆细胞瘤 (PCN) 和 MRD 面板。RA的数量各不相同,急性HLN、慢性HLN、PCN、ALL-MRD和多发性骨髓瘤-MRD分别使用了32、26、12、14和10种抗体。荧光团的数量从 4 到 10 不等。RA、SA、RAA 和 ACN 种类繁多。大多数医院采用 20% 的阳性标准,而一家医院对急性和慢性 HLN 面板采用 10% 的阳性标准。五家医院使用 IC 作为阴性标准。阳性/阴性分配、百分比和一般意见是常见的报告内容。在 MRD 报告中,检测限和定量下限也包括在内:这是首次对韩国 FCI-HLN 现状进行的全面研究,证实了 FCI-HLN 实践的高度异质性和复杂性。FCI-HLN 标准化迫在眉睫。研究结果为制定标准的 FCI-HLN 指南提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Annals of Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
12.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Laboratory Medicine is the official journal of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The journal title has been recently changed from the Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (ISSN, 1598-6535) from the January issue of 2012. The JCR 2017 Impact factor of Ann Lab Med was 1.916.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信