Telehealth experience during COVID-19 at an American burn Association (ABA) verified adult and pediatric burn center

Q3 Medicine
Hannan A. Maqsood , Jacob M. Dougherty , Parker Martin , Zhaohui Fan , Cindy Wegryn , Stewart C. Wang , Gary A. Vercruysse , Mark R. Hemmila , Naveen F. Sangji
{"title":"Telehealth experience during COVID-19 at an American burn Association (ABA) verified adult and pediatric burn center","authors":"Hannan A. Maqsood ,&nbsp;Jacob M. Dougherty ,&nbsp;Parker Martin ,&nbsp;Zhaohui Fan ,&nbsp;Cindy Wegryn ,&nbsp;Stewart C. Wang ,&nbsp;Gary A. Vercruysse ,&nbsp;Mark R. Hemmila ,&nbsp;Naveen F. Sangji","doi":"10.1016/j.burnso.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in unprecedented changes to healthcare services. Non-emergent, out-patient care was either discontinued, greatly reduced, or switched to telehealth during the first wave of the pandemic. Here, we describe an American Burn Association (ABA) verified Burn Center’s experience with telehealth services during and after the COVID-19 emergency.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>In this retrospective study, all patients who underwent out-patient care at a large academic hospital’s ABA Burn Center between March 2018 and March 2023 were identified from the electronic medical record system. Descriptive analysis was carried out to delineate trends in outpatient in-person and telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic. The travel distance saved from the introduction of telehealth was determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, 3471 patients underwent a total of 7444 out-patient visits for burn care. There were no telehealth visits prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, 14.9% of all out-patient visits were conducted with telehealth. This decreased to 8.3% and 6.8% of all out-patient care in the second and third years of the pandemic, respectively. The average round trip travel distance saved was 123 miles (2.8–––2312 miles). No complications were reported specific to receiving telehealth care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Telehealth is a feasible option for out-patient burn care in selected patients and reduces travel for patients. Further studies are needed to assess patient and clinician satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and the economic impact of telehealth utilization to help guide appropriateness of use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72486,"journal":{"name":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","volume":"8 1","pages":"Pages 19-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912223000445/pdfft?md5=d1b75ce27c678978e7250145ba9bebd4&pid=1-s2.0-S2468912223000445-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns open : an international open access journal for burn injuries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468912223000445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in unprecedented changes to healthcare services. Non-emergent, out-patient care was either discontinued, greatly reduced, or switched to telehealth during the first wave of the pandemic. Here, we describe an American Burn Association (ABA) verified Burn Center’s experience with telehealth services during and after the COVID-19 emergency.

Material and methods

In this retrospective study, all patients who underwent out-patient care at a large academic hospital’s ABA Burn Center between March 2018 and March 2023 were identified from the electronic medical record system. Descriptive analysis was carried out to delineate trends in outpatient in-person and telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic. The travel distance saved from the introduction of telehealth was determined.

Results

During the study period, 3471 patients underwent a total of 7444 out-patient visits for burn care. There were no telehealth visits prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, 14.9% of all out-patient visits were conducted with telehealth. This decreased to 8.3% and 6.8% of all out-patient care in the second and third years of the pandemic, respectively. The average round trip travel distance saved was 123 miles (2.8–––2312 miles). No complications were reported specific to receiving telehealth care.

Conclusions

Telehealth is a feasible option for out-patient burn care in selected patients and reduces travel for patients. Further studies are needed to assess patient and clinician satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and the economic impact of telehealth utilization to help guide appropriateness of use.

美国烧伤协会 (ABA) 认证的成人和儿童烧伤中心在 COVID-19 期间的远程医疗经验
导言 COVID-19 大流行给医疗保健服务带来了前所未有的变化。在第一波大流行期间,非急诊门诊护理要么中断,要么大幅减少,要么转为远程医疗。在此,我们描述了美国烧伤协会(ABA)认证的烧伤中心在 COVID-19 紧急事件期间和之后使用远程医疗服务的经验。在这项回顾性研究中,我们从电子病历系统中识别了 2018 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在一家大型学术医院的 ABA 烧伤中心接受门诊治疗的所有患者。研究人员进行了描述性分析,以描述 COVID-19 大流行期间门诊亲诊和远程医疗服务的趋势。结果在研究期间,共有 3471 名患者接受了 7444 次烧伤护理门诊就诊。在 COVID-19 大流行之前,没有远程医疗就诊。在 COVID-19 大流行的第一年,14.9% 的门诊就诊是通过远程医疗进行的。在大流行的第二年和第三年,这一比例分别降至 8.3% 和 6.8%。平均节省的往返旅行距离为 123 英里(2.8--2312 英里)。结论远程医疗是对选定患者进行烧伤门诊治疗的可行选择,并能减少患者的旅行。需要进一步研究评估患者和临床医生的满意度、临床结果以及远程医疗的经济影响,以帮助指导远程医疗的合理使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信